Chapter Twenty-Four - Freedom, Opportunity, and Well-Being

This paper reexamines key results from the measurement of opportunity freedom, or the extent to which a set of options offers a decision maker real opportunities to achieve. Three cases are investigated: no preferences, a single preference, and plural preferences. The three corresponding evaluation methods—the cardinality relation, the indirect utility relation, and the effective freedom relation—and their variations are considered within a common axiomatic framework. Special attention is given to representations of freedom rankings, with the goal of providing practical approaches for measuring opportunity freedom and the extent of people's capabilities.

[1]  T. Rader,et al.  The Existence of a Utility Function to Represent Preferences , 1963 .

[2]  A. Sen,et al.  FREEDOM OF CHOICE: CONCEPT AND CONTENT , 2008 .

[3]  W. Bossert Opportunity sets and uncertain consequences1 , 2000 .

[4]  Julian Le Grand,et al.  The Political Economy Of Public Choice , 1981 .

[5]  B. Weisbrod,et al.  Collective-Consumption Services of Individual-Consumption Goods , 1964 .

[6]  A. Sen,et al.  Inequality Re-examined , 1995 .

[7]  J. Mill Principles of Political Economy (I): Production , 1848 .

[8]  I. Kant,et al.  The Critique of Practical Reason , 1949 .

[9]  Tjalling C. Koopmans,et al.  On Flexibility of Future Preference , 1962 .

[10]  Alain Trannoy,et al.  Freedom in Economics : New Perspectives in Normative Analysis , 1997 .

[11]  D. Primont,et al.  Duality, Separability, and Functional Structure: Theory and Economic Applications , 1978 .

[12]  E. Thorbecke,et al.  The Foster-Greer-Thorbecke (FGT) Poverty Measures: Twenty-Five Years Later , 2010 .

[13]  Marlies Klemisch-Ahlert,et al.  Freedom of choice , 1971, The Review of Politics.

[14]  E. Thorbecke,et al.  The Foster–Greer–Thorbecke (FGT) poverty measures: 25 years later , 2010 .

[15]  A. Atkinson Multidimensional Deprivation: Contrasting Social Welfare and Counting Approaches , 2003 .

[16]  M. Hoel EXTERMINATION OF SELF-REPRODUCIBLE NATURAL RESOURCES UNDER COMPETITIVE CONDITIONS , 1978 .

[17]  J. Humphries,et al.  Capabilities, freedom, and equality : Amartya Sen's work from a gender perspective , 2006 .

[18]  P. Pattanaik,et al.  On Ranking Opportunity Sets in Terms of Freedom of Choice , 1990, Recherches économiques de Louvain.

[19]  T. Scitovsky Human Desire And Economic Satisfaction , 1986 .

[20]  T. Bewley Knightian decision theory. Part I , 2002 .

[21]  Prasanta K. Pattanaik,et al.  Choice, welfare, and development : a Festschrift in honour of Amartya Sen , 1995 .

[22]  H. Putnam The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays , 2002 .

[23]  A. Sen,et al.  Rationality and Freedom , 2002 .

[24]  A. Sen,et al.  Well-Being, Agency and Freedom the Dewey Lectures 1984 * , 1985 .

[25]  F. Bourguignon,et al.  The Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty , 2003 .

[26]  L. López-Calva,et al.  Chapter Sixteen - Functionings and Capabilities , 2011 .

[27]  I. Gilboa Theory Of Decision Under Uncertainty , 2009 .

[28]  S. Alkire Concepts and Measures of Agency , 2008 .

[29]  R. Aumann UTILITY THEORY WITHOUT THE COMPLETENESS AXIOM , 1962 .

[30]  James M. Buchanan,et al.  Social Choice, Democracy, and Free Markets , 1954, Journal of Political Economy.

[31]  Ricardo Arlegi,et al.  Ranking opportunity sets: An approach based on the preference for flexibility , 2001, Soc. Choice Welf..

[32]  Thomas Nagel,et al.  The Possibility of Altruism , 1970 .

[33]  Robert Sudgen,et al.  The Metric of Opportunity , 1998, Economics and Philosophy.

[34]  R. Quandt,et al.  Strategies and rational decisions in the securities options market , 1970 .

[35]  Prasanta K. Pattanaik,et al.  On Ranking Opportunity Sets in Economic Environments , 2000, J. Econ. Theory.

[36]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[37]  Amartya Sen,et al.  Welfare, preference and freedom , 1991 .

[38]  K. Ruwanpura Book review. Capabilities, freedom, and equality: Amartya Sen’s work from a gender perspective by Bina Agarwal, Jane Humphries, and Ingrid Robeyns (eds.). Delhi: Oxford University Press. , 2009 .

[39]  A. Sen,et al.  Equality of What? , 1980, Seven Deadly Economic Sins.

[40]  Amartya Sen,et al.  Welfare, Freedom and Social Choice: a Reply , 1990, Recherches économiques de Louvain.

[41]  J. Mill Principles of Political Economy (III): Exchange , 1848 .

[42]  Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen: Volume I: Ethics, Welfare, and Measurement , 2008 .

[43]  M. Hees On the Analysis of Negative Freedom , 1998 .

[44]  Efe A. Ok Utility Representation of an Incomplete Preference Relation , 2002, J. Econ. Theory.

[45]  Prasanta K. Pattanaik,et al.  On Preference and Freedom , 1998 .

[46]  Amartya Sen,et al.  Concepts of human development and poverty : a multidimensional perspective , 1997 .

[47]  C. Puppe An Axiomatic Approach to “Preference for Freedom of Choice” , 1996 .

[48]  長峰 章,et al.  図書館特別資料紹介 Adam Smith,The Theory of Moral Sentiments,London,1759.初版本の紹介 , 2008 .

[49]  J. Mill Principles of Political Economy , 2011, Forerunners of Realizable Values Accounting in Financial Reporting.

[50]  John S. Chipman,et al.  On social welfare functions and the aggregation of preferences , 1979 .

[51]  V. Peragine The Distribution and Redistribution of Opportunity , 1999 .

[52]  Amartya Sen,et al.  A Note on Representing Partial Orderings , 1976 .

[53]  Anthony B. Atkinson,et al.  Income Distribution and Differences in Needs , 1987 .

[54]  Keith Dowding,et al.  Freedom of Choice , 2009 .

[55]  R. Nozick Anarchy, State, and Utopia , 1975, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[56]  J. Foster Notes on Effective Freedom , 2010 .

[57]  A. Sen,et al.  The idea of justice , 2009, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[58]  W. Bossert,et al.  Ranking Sets of Objects , 2001 .

[59]  O. Lange,et al.  Studies in Mathematical Economics and Econometrics , 1942 .

[60]  Walter Bossert,et al.  Ranking Opportunity Sets: A n Ax-iomatic Approach , 1994 .

[61]  J. Mill Principles of Political Economy (II): Distribution , 2022 .

[62]  J. Weymark Generalized Gini Indices of Equality of Opportunity , 2003 .

[63]  P. Hammond,et al.  Handbook of Utility Theory , 2004 .

[64]  David M. Kreps A REPRESENTATION THEOREM FOR "PREFERENCE FOR FLEXIBILITY" , 1979 .

[65]  H.C.M. de Swart,et al.  Logic, Game Theory and Social Choice , 1999 .

[66]  E. Thorbecke,et al.  A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures , 1984 .

[67]  M. Shelly,et al.  HUMAN JUDGMENTS AND OPTIMALITY.. , 1966 .

[68]  A. Sen,et al.  XII—Plural Utility , 1981 .

[69]  Martin van Hees,et al.  Freedom and Opportunity , 1999 .

[70]  A. Sen,et al.  Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement , 1976 .

[71]  W. Gaertner A Primer in Social Choice Theory , 2006 .

[72]  S. Alkire,et al.  Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement , 2010 .