Categories of Friends on Social Networking Sites: An Exploratory Study

The widespread use of social networking sites has transformed the ways people make, communicate with and manage their friends. This study seeks to find out students’ perception of the types of friends they have on their social networking sites (SNS), such as Facebook and Twitter, in comparison to offline friends, and the quality of these friendships. A questionnaire survey was administered to 104 graduate students in the Division of Information Studies at the Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. It was found that the main categories of friends on SNS are school friends, work-related friends, friends sharing same interest/activity and family. The study also found differences by age, gender and nationality. Female respondents were more likely to list school friends, workrelated friends and family friends than male respondents, who were more likely to list friends with the same interest/activity. Local Singaporeans were more likely to list friends sharing same interest/activity, whereas international students from India and China were more likely to list family friends, close friends, mutual friends and school friends. Females, younger people and international students tended to have a bigger variety of friends. Generally, respondents rated their offline friends higher in quality compared to their online friends. The results also show that friendships of longer duration are viewed as higher quality, for both online and offline friends. A follow-up study will examine the kinds of information exchanged between different types of friends.

[1]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  The quality of online, offline, and mixed-mode friendships among users of a social networking site , 2012 .

[2]  P. Mishra,et al.  How Online Identities Impact Offline Relationships , 2011 .

[3]  Jessica Vitak,et al.  Facebook "Friends": How Online Identities Impact Offline Relationships , 2008 .

[4]  Kerk F. Kee,et al.  Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students’ Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation 1 , 2009 .

[5]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  `Making Moosic': The Development of Personal Relationships on Line and a Comparison to their Off-Line Counterparts , 1998 .

[6]  S. Duck,et al.  Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions. , 1998 .

[7]  Paul Solomon,et al.  Looking for Information—A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior , 2003, Information Retrieval.

[8]  Sandra L. Calvert,et al.  College students' social networking experiences on Facebook , 2009 .

[9]  P. Wright Self-Referent Motivation and the Intrinsic Quality of Friendship , 1984 .

[10]  Sei-Ching Joanna Sin,et al.  International students' everyday life information seeking: The informational value of social networking sites , 2013 .

[11]  Rosanna E. Guadagno,et al.  Make new friends or keep the old: Gender and personality differences in social networking use , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Measuring Tie Strength , 1984 .

[13]  J. D. Johnson Cancer-Related Information Seeking , 1997 .

[14]  Lorrie Faith Cranor,et al.  An Investigation into Facebook Friend Grouping , 2011, INTERACT.

[15]  R. Pahl,et al.  Rethinking Friendship: Hidden Solidarities Today , 2006 .

[16]  Hsi-Peng Lu,et al.  Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  Malcolm R. Parks Making Friends in Cyberspace , 1996, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[18]  van Knippenberg,et al.  The social dimension: Intergroup differences in group perceptions , 1984 .

[19]  G. H. Cheng,et al.  A Comparison of Offline and Online Friendship Qualities at Different Stages of Relationship Development , 2004 .

[20]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[21]  斎藤 香,et al.  Friendship , 1998, Terror Capitalism.