Corporate Venture Capital as a Window on New Technologies: Implications for the Performance of Corporate Investors When Acquiring Startups

Gaining a “window” on new technologies is a prominent motive for corporate venture capital (CVC) investing. Recent studies suggest that information gained through CVC-related activities can improve the internal R&D productivity of established firms. This study investigates an alternative means by which information gained through CVC investing could improve firm performance---by increasing the returns to corporate investors when acquiring startups. We provide new insights based on an event study of the returns to 34 corporate investors from acquiring 242 technology startups. Consistent with predictions drawn from the absorptive capacity literature, we find that the effect of CVC investing on acquisition performance hinges critically on the strength of the acquirer's internal knowledge base: as CVC investments increase relative to an acquirer's total R&D expenditures, acquisition performance improves at a diminishing rate. We also find that firms consistently engaged in venture financing earn greater returns when acquiring startups than do firms with more sporadic patterns of investing, even controlling for firm profitability, size, and acquisition experience. These findings suggest that corporate investors systematically differ in their abilities to derive added benefits from external venturing as acquirers of entrepreneurial firms.

[1]  Ove Granstrand,et al.  The Acquisition of Technology and Small Firms by Large Firms , 1990 .

[2]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Swimming with Sharks: Technology Ventures, Defense Mechanisms and Corporate Relationships , 2008 .

[3]  Jeffry Netter,et al.  What do returns to acquiring firms tell us? Evidence from firms that make many acquisitions , 2002 .

[4]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[5]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[6]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[7]  Markku V. J. Maula,et al.  Corporate venture capital and the creation of U.S.Public Companies: The impact of sources of venture capital on the performance of portfolio companies , 2000 .

[8]  Erik Stafford,et al.  New Evidence and Perspectives on Mergers , 2001 .

[9]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  The Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[10]  D. Mowery.  The relationship between intrafirm and contractual forms of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1900-1940 , 1983 .

[11]  Paul A. Gompers.  Corporations and the Financing of Innovation: The Corporate Venturing Experience , 2002 .

[12]  M. Lenox,et al.  When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures?: Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates , 2005 .

[13]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .

[14]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[15]  A. Arora,et al.  Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: Scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology , 1994 .

[16]  Alexander Ljungqvist,et al.  Whom You Know Matters: Venture Capital Networks and Investment Performance , 2007 .

[17]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Fortune favors the prepared firm , 1994 .

[18]  H. Chesbrough.  The Era of Open Innovation , 2003 .

[19]  Andrei Shleifer,et al.  Do Managerial Objectives Drive Bad Acquisitions? , 1989 .

[20]  Phanish Puranam,et al.  Integrating Acquired Capabilities: When Structural Integration is (Un)Necessary , 2005 .

[21]  Thomas F. Hellmann,et al.  A theory of strategic venture investing , 2002 .

[22]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[23]  B. Lev.  Sharpening the intangibles edge. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[24]  R. Coff,et al.  Bidding Wars Over R&D Intensive Firms: Knowledge, Opportunism and the Market for Corporate Control , 2003 .

[25]  Zenas Block,et al.  Corporate Venturing: Creating New Businesses Within the Firm , 1993 .

[26]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[27]  Melissa E. Graebner.  Momentum and serendipity: how acquired leaders create value in the integration of technology firms , 2004 .

[28]  Sydney Finkelstein,et al.  Understanding Acquisition Performance: The Role of Transfer Effects , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[29]  Hart E. Posen,et al.  Firm R&D Behavior and Evolving Technology in Established Industries , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[30]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[31]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[32]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers , 1999 .

[33]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy , 2004 .

[34]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Reputation and corporate strategy: A review of recent theory and applications , 1988 .

[35]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[36]  H. Barkema,et al.  Learning Through Acquisitions , 2001 .

[37]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  When to ally & when to acquire. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[38]  Holger Ernst,et al.  The Influence of Corporate Acquisitions on the Behaviour of Key Inventors , 2000 .

[39]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Corporate venture capitalists: Autonomy, obstacles, and performance , 1988 .

[40]  L. Argote.  Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge , 1999 .

[41]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Alliance capability, stock market response, and long‐term alliance success: the role of the alliance function , 2002 .

[42]  Rosemarie Ham Ziedonis,et al.  CORPORATE VENTURE CAPITAL AND THE RETURNS TO ACQUIRING ENTREPRENEURIAL FIRMS , 2006 .

[43]  Sam Ransbotham,et al.  Target Age and the Acquisition of Innovation in High-Technology Industries , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[44]  T. Khanna,et al.  Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances , 2000 .

[45]  N. Travlos,et al.  Corporate Takeover Bids, Methods of Payment, and Bidding Firms' Stock Returns , 1987 .

[46]  S. Kotha,et al.  Knowledge Creation Through External Venturing: Evidence from the Telecommunications Equipment Manufacturing Industry , 2006 .

[47]  Will Mitchell,et al.  Selection Capability: How Capability Gaps and Internal Social Frictions Affect Internal and External Strategic Renewal , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[48]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Making sense of corporate venture capital. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[49]  R. Coff,et al.  How Buyers Cope with Uncertainty When Acquiring Firms in Knowledge-Intensive Industries: Caveat Emptor , 1999 .

[50]  A. Mackinlay,et al.  Event Studies in Economics and Finance , 1997 .

[51]  Annette L. Ranft,et al.  Acquiring New Technologies and Capabilities: A Grounded Model of Acquisition Implementation , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[52]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[53]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures , 1999 .

[54]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Seller's Side of the Story: Acquisition as Courtship and Governance as Syndicate in Entrepreneurial Firms , 2004 .

[55]  Laurence Capron,et al.  Acquisitions of private vs. public firms: Private information, target selection, and acquirer returns , 2007 .

[56]  S. Finkelstein,et al.  The Influence of Organizational Acquisition Experience on Acquisition Performance: A Behavioral Learning Perspective , 1999 .

[57]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Strategic Renewal of Organizations , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[58]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[59]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[60]  Matthew J. Higgins,et al.  The outsourcing of R&D through acquisitions in the pharmaceutical industry , 2006 .

[61]  Paul A. Gompers,et al.  The Determinants of Corporate Venture Capital Successes: Organizational Structure, Incentives, and Complementarities , 1998 .

[62]  Darrell Rigby,et al.  Open-market innovation. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[63]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Event Studies In Management Research: Theoretical And Empirical Issues , 1997 .

[64]  Michael J. Lenox,et al.  When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures? , 2005 .

[65]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[66]  Samuel Kortum,et al.  Assessing the Contribution of Venture Capital to Innovation , 2000 .

[67]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[68]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Organizing for Innovation: Managing the Coordination-Autonomy Dilemma in Technology Acquisitions , 2006 .

[69]  J. Myles Shaver,et al.  Limitations to interorganizational knowledge acquisition: The paradox of corporate venture capital , 2009 .

[70]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[71]  Richard S. Ruback,et al.  Does Corporate Performance Improve after Mergers? , 1990 .

[72]  J. Reuer,et al.  Adverse Selection in Acquisitions of Small Manufacturing Firms: A Comparison of Private and Public Targets , 2005 .

[73]  David A. Nadler,et al.  Organizing for Innovation , 1986 .

[74]  Mathew L. A. Hayward.  When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990 to 1995 , 2002 .

[75]  R. Katila,et al.  Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction , 2002 .

[76]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Acquisition Integration and Productivity Losses in the Technical Core: Disruption of Inventors in Acquired Companies , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[77]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[78]  Karsten Schween,et al.  Corporate venture capital : Risikokapitalfinanzierung deutscher industrieunternehmen , 1996 .

[79]  Raphael Amit,et al.  Creating Value: Winners in the New Business Environment , 2002 .

[80]  Manju Puri,et al.  Venture Capital and the Professionalization of Start-Up Firms: Empirical Evidence , 2000 .

[81]  David Stolin,et al.  Returns to Acquirers of Listed and Unlisted Targets , 2004, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[82]  Jay B. Barney,et al.  Returns to bidding firms in mergers and acquisitions: Reconsidering the relatedness hypothesis , 1988 .

[83]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Syndication Networks and the Spatial Distribution of Venture Capital Investments1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[84]  René M. Stulz,et al.  Firm size and the gains from acquisitions , 2004 .

[85]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[86]  Ulrike Malmendier,et al.  CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Investment , 2002 .

[87]  Saeyoung Chang,et al.  Takeovers of Privately Held Targets, Methods of Payment, and Bidder Returns , 1998 .