( 11 C)acetate in an androgen-sensitive and androgen-independent prostate cancer xenograft model

Background: Androgen deprivation (AD) is generally used as a first-line palliative treatment in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after primary therapy. To acquire an accurate detection of tumour viability following AD with positron emission tomography (PET), an androgen-independent uptake of tracers would be advantageous. Several metabolic PET tracers are employed for detecting recurrent PCa. We evaluated the effect of AD on the uptake of 2-deoxy-2-[ 18 F]fluoro-D-glucose ([ 18 F]FDG), [ 11 C]choline and [ 11 C]acetate in vivo. Methods: An [ 18 F]FDG, [ 11 C]choline and [ 11 C]acetate baseline micro(μ)PET/μ computed tomography (CT) scan was subsequently performed in xenografts of androgen-sensitive (LAPC-4) and androgen-independent (22Rv1) tumours in nude mice. An untreated control group was compared to a surgical castration group, i.e. androgen-deprived group. μPET/μCT imaging with the above-mentioned tracers was repeated 5 days after the start of treatment. The percentage change of SUVmax and SUVmeanTH in the tumours was calculated. Results: AD did not significantly affect the uptake of [ 18 F]FDG and [ 11 C]choline in LAPC-4 tumours as compared with the uptake of both tracers in untreated tumours. In control 22Rv1 tumours, [ 11 C]choline and [ 18 F]FDG uptake increased over time. However, compared with the uptake in control tumours, AD significantly decreased the uptake of [ 11 C] choline and tended to decrease [ 18 F]FDG uptake. [ 11 C]acetate uptake remained unaffected by AD in both PCa xenograft models. Conclusions: [ 18 F]FDG and especially [ 11 C]choline PET, which is currently used for the detection of recurrent PCa, could miss or underestimate the presence of local recurrent PCa following AD therapy. [ 11 C]acetate uptake occurs

[1]  C. Calaminus,et al.  Assessment of PET Tracer Uptake in Hormone-Independent and Hormone-Dependent Xenograft Prostate Cancer Mouse Models , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  F. Mottaghy,et al.  Do androgens control the uptake of 18F-FDG, 11C-choline and 11C-acetate in human prostate cancer cell lines? , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[3]  M. Marzola,et al.  Androgen deprivation therapy influences the uptake of 11C-choline in patients with recurrent prostate cancer: the preliminary results of a sequential PET/CT study , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[4]  K. Tomer,et al.  Activation of the androgen receptor by intratumoral bioconversion of androstanediol to dihydrotestosterone in prostate cancer. , 2011, Cancer research.

[5]  V. Bettinardi,et al.  Predictive factors of [11C]choline PET/CT in patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[6]  Hong Zhang,et al.  Imaging a pancreatic carcinoma xenograft model with 11C-acetate: a comparison study with 18F-FDG , 2009, Nuclear medicine communications.

[7]  Xiankui Li,et al.  Choline Autoradiography of Human Prostate Cancer Xenograft: Effect of Castration , 2008, Molecular imaging.

[8]  V. Bettinardi,et al.  [11C]Choline uptake with PET/CT for the initial diagnosis of prostate cancer: relation to PSA levels, tumour stage and anti-androgenic therapy , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[9]  F. Mottaghy,et al.  Evaluation of [11C]‐choline positron‐emission/computed tomography in patients with increasing prostate‐specific antigen levels after primary treatment for prostate cancer , 2007, BJU international.

[10]  S. Larson,et al.  2-[18F]Fluoro-2-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for the Detection of Disease in Patients with Prostate-Specific Antigen Relapse after Radical Prostatectomy , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[11]  J. Pinski,et al.  Glucose Metabolism of Human Prostate Cancer Mouse Xenografts , 2005, Molecular imaging.

[12]  T. Higuchi,et al.  Comparison of 11C-choline PET and FDG PET for the differential diagnosis of malignant tumors , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[13]  C. Korch,et al.  Molecular characterization of human prostate carcinoma cell lines , 2003, The Prostate.

[14]  T. Roskams,et al.  Androgens stimulate coordinated lipogenic gene expression in normal target tissues in vivo , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[15]  J. Karstens,et al.  Positron emission tomography with 11C-acetate and 18F-FDG in prostate cancer patients , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[16]  J Kotzerke,et al.  Intraindividual comparison of [11C]acetate and [11C]choline PET for detection of metastases of prostate cancer , 2003, Nuklearmedizin.

[17]  C. Tepper,et al.  Characterization of a novel androgen receptor mutation in a relapsed CWR22 prostate cancer xenograft and cell line. , 2002, Cancer research.

[18]  Joonyoung Kim,et al.  MicroPET assessment of androgenic control of glucose and acetate uptake in the rat prostate and a prostate cancer tumor model. , 2002, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[19]  T. Roskams,et al.  Overexpression of fatty acid synthase is an early and common event in the development of prostate cancer , 2002, International journal of cancer.

[20]  J. Swinnen,et al.  Androgens stimulate lipogenic gene expression in prostate cancer cells by activation of the sterol regulatory element-binding protein cleavage activating protein/sterol regulatory element-binding protein pathway. , 2001, Molecular endocrinology.

[21]  N. Sadato,et al.  FDG PET for evaluating the change of glucose metabolism in prostate cancer after androgen ablation , 2001, Nuclear medicine communications.

[22]  J. Nelson,et al.  Detection of increased choline compounds with proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy subsequent to malignant transformation of human prostatic epithelial cells. , 2001, Cancer research.

[23]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Experimental and clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) in dynamic PET: quantitative characteristics and effects on kinetic modeling. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  S. Schwartz,et al.  A new human prostate carcinoma cell line, 22Rv1 , 1999, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal.

[25]  T. Block,et al.  Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Is Useless for the Detection of Local Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy , 1999, European Urology.

[26]  K. A. Klein,et al.  Progression of metastatic human prostate cancer to androgen independence in immunodeficient SCID mice , 1997, Nature Medicine.

[27]  M. Terris,et al.  Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography studies in diagnosis and staging of clinically organ-confined prostate cancer. , 2001, Urology.