Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR approaches based on TODIM for evaluating internet banking website quality of Ghanaian banking industry

Abstract With the rapid development of Internet banking technology in Ghana, the website quality evaluation is the essential core of the customer, which is regarded as a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem. Due to the uncertainty of Internet banking, the evaluation of criteria may be measured by Pythagorean fuzzy numbers (PFNs). In addition, the customer usually does not exhibit complete rationality in the decision procedure. Based on the traditional VIKOR (Vise Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) method of MCDM, this paper provides a new perspective of a compromised solution, which can handle the decision maker’s psychological behavior by inducing TODIM (a Portuguese acronym meaning Interactive Multi-Criteria Decision Making). By defining Pythagorean fuzzy entropy and cross-entropy measures, we study the determination of the weights of the criteria in advance. Then, considering the psychological behavior of the customer, we design two types of strategies for the combination between TODIM and VIKOR. Meanwhile, the corresponding methods have been developed, i.e., Approaches I and II. After that, a simulated example of ranking Internet banking websites in the Ghanaian banking industry is given to illustrate the validity and applicability of our proposed approaches. Finally, we utilize the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and then discuss the differences among VIKOR, TODIM and our proposed methods.

[1]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Pythagorean Membership Grades in Multicriteria Decision Making , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[2]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Anastasios A. Economides,et al.  Evaluating tax sites: an evaluation framework and its application , 2008, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[4]  Renuka Mahajan,et al.  New measures of weighted fuzzy entropy and their applications for the study of maximum weighted fuzzy entropy principle , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[5]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  An extended VIKOR method based on prospect theory for multiple attribute decision making under interval type-2 fuzzy environment , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[6]  Jun Ye,et al.  Two effective measures of intuitionistic fuzzy entropy , 2010, Computing.

[7]  Janusz Kacprzyk,et al.  Entropy for intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[8]  F. Wilcoxon Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .

[9]  Xiaolu Zhang,et al.  A Novel Approach Based on Similarity Measure for Pythagorean Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making , 2016, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[10]  V. Zeithaml,et al.  E-S-QUAL A Multiple-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality , 2004 .

[11]  Luís Alberto Duncan Rangel,et al.  An application of the TODIM method to the multicriteria rental evaluation of residential properties , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Extension of TOPSIS to Multiple Criteria Decision Making with Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets , 2014, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[13]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Projection Model for Fusing the Information of Pythagorean Fuzzy Multicriteria Group Decision Making Based on Geometric Bonferroni Mean , 2017, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[14]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Zheng Zhou,et al.  Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of information presenting Web portals , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[16]  Xiao Zhang,et al.  Extended TODIM method for hybrid multiple attribute decision making problems , 2013, Knowl. Based Syst..

[17]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[18]  Omolbanin Yazdanbakhsh,et al.  On Pythagorean and Complex Fuzzy Set Operations , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[19]  Dejian Yu,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy geometric Heronian mean aggregation operators , 2013, Appl. Soft Comput..

[20]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Intuitionistic Fuzzy Bonferroni Means , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[21]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  The TODIM analysis approach based on novel measured functions under hesitant fuzzy environment , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..

[22]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic VIKOR Method and Its Application in Qualitative Multiple Criteria Decision Making , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[23]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Projection Models for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[24]  Krassimir T. Atanassov,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 1986 .

[25]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant Fuzzy Thermodynamic Method for Emergency Decision Making Based on Prospect Theory , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[26]  Yong Yang,et al.  Some Results for Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets , 2015, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[27]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  A VIKOR-based method for hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making , 2013, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making.

[28]  Yong Yang,et al.  Pythagorean Fuzzy Choquet Integral Based MABAC Method for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making , 2016, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[29]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Pythagorean fuzzy TODIM approach to multi-criteria decision making , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[30]  Yong Yang,et al.  Pythagorean Fuzzy Information Measures and Their Applications , 2017, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[31]  Xiaolu Zhang,et al.  Multicriteria Pythagorean fuzzy decision analysis: A hierarchical QUALIFLEX approach with the closeness index-based ranking methods , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[32]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy entropy and cross‐entropy and their use in multiattribute decision‐making , 2012, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[33]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[34]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Entropy/cross entropy-based group decision making under intuitionistic fuzzy environment , 2012, Inf. Fusion.

[35]  Xindong Peng,et al.  Approaches to Pythagorean Fuzzy Stochastic Multi‐criteria Decision Making Based on Prospect Theory and Regret Theory with New Distance Measure and Score Function , 2017, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[36]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Pythagorean Membership Grades, Complex Numbers, and Decision Making , 2013, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[37]  Miin-Shen Yang,et al.  On the J-divergence of intuitionistic fuzzy sets with its application to pattern recognition , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[38]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  A fuzzy approach to e-banking website quality assessment based on an integrated AHP-ELECTRE method , 2011 .

[39]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  A statistical comparative study of different similarity measures of consensus in group decision making , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[40]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy linguistic entropy and cross-entropy measures and alternative queuing method for multiple criteria decision making , 2017, Inf. Sci..

[41]  Younghwa Lee,et al.  Investigating the effect of website quality on e-business success: An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[42]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  WebQual: An Instrument for Consumer Evaluation of Web Sites , 2007, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[43]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  An extended TODIM multi-criteria group decision making method for green supplier selection in interval type-2 fuzzy environment , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[44]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Pythagorean fuzzy subsets , 2013, 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS).

[45]  Yong Yang,et al.  Fundamental Properties of Interval‐Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Aggregation Operators , 2016, Int. J. Intell. Syst..