Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites

Despite its centrality to human thought and practice, aesthetics has for the most part played a petty role in human-computer interaction research. Increasingly, however, researchers attempt to strike a balance between the traditional concerns of human-computer interaction and considerations of aesthetics. Thus, recent research suggests that the visual aesthetics of computer interfaces is a strong determinant of users' satisfaction and pleasure. However, the lack of appropriate concepts and measures of aesthetics may severely constraint future research in this area. To address this issue, we conducted four studies in order to develop a measurement instrument of perceived web site aesthetics. Using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses we found that users' perceptions consist of two main dimensions, which we termed "classical aesthetics" and "expressive aesthetics". The classical aesthetics dimension pertains to aesthetic notions that presided from antiquity until the 18th century. These notions emphasize orderly and clear design and are closely related to many of the design rules advocated by usability experts. The expressive aesthetics dimension is manifested by the designers' creativity and originality and by the ability to break design conventions. While both dimensions of perceived aesthetic are drawn from a pool of aesthetic judgments, they are clearly distinguishable from each other. Each of the aesthetic dimensions is measured by a five-item scale. The reliabilities, factor structure and validity tests indicate that these items reflect the two perceived aesthetics dimensions adequately.

[1]  Chang Liu,et al.  Exploring the factors associated with Web site success in the context of electronic commerce , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[2]  David W. Gerbing,et al.  An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment , 1988 .

[3]  Carolyn Snyder,et al.  Web Site Usability: A Designer's Guide , 1997 .

[4]  Knowlton W. Johnson Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: Testing a Theory for Research Use , 1998 .

[5]  J. Nasar Environmental aesthetics: Perception and evaluation of residential street scenes , 1988 .

[6]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[7]  J. W. Getzels,et al.  AESTHETIC OPINION: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY , 1969 .

[8]  Wayne C. Neale,et al.  Designing usable and visually appealing web sites , 1997, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[9]  James Fogarty,et al.  Aesthetic information collages: generating decorative displays that contain information , 2001, UIST '01.

[10]  Robert G. Hershberger Environmental aesthetics: A study of meaning and architecture , 1988 .

[11]  Jack L. Nasar,et al.  Environmental aesthetics : theory, research, and applications , 1988 .

[12]  Philip H. Mirvis Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1991 .

[13]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[14]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. , 1999 .

[15]  J. Russell Environmental aesthetics: Affective appraisals of environments , 1988 .

[16]  D. Russell In Search of Underlying Dimensions: The Use (and Abuse) of Factor Analysis in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 2002 .

[17]  Gerald C. Cupchik,et al.  From perception to production: A multilevel analysis of the aesthetic process. , 1992 .

[18]  J. Porteous Environmental Aesthetics: Ideas, Politics and Planning , 1996 .

[19]  D. Berlyne Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation, , 1974 .

[20]  Ronald E. Roblin A New Theory of Beauty , 1977 .

[21]  Henry Petroski,et al.  The Evolution of Useful Things , 1992, Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems.

[22]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[23]  Thomas Jacobsen,et al.  Aesthetics Electrified: An Analysis of Descriptive Symmetry and Evaluative Aesthetic Judgment Processes Using Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2001 .

[24]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[26]  J. Nasar Visual Preferences in Urban Street Scenes , 1984 .

[27]  Edward E. Rigdon,et al.  Experiential value: Conceptualization, measurement and application in the catalog and Internet shopping environment. , 2001 .

[28]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: the problem of capitalization on chance. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  Claude O. Archer,et al.  A look, by simulation, at the validity of some asymptotic distribution results for rotated loadings , 1976 .

[30]  Rudolf Arnheim,et al.  From Function to Expression , 1964 .

[31]  Jason Gait An Aspect of Aesthetics in Human-Computer Communications: Pretty Windows , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[32]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity , 1999 .

[33]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Emotion & design: attractive things work better , 2002, INTR.

[34]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications , 1992 .

[35]  Michael H. Mitias,et al.  Aesthetic quality and aesthetic experience , 1991 .

[36]  Paul Hekkert,et al.  Beauty in the eye of expert and nonexpert beholders : A study in the appraisal of art , 1996 .

[37]  R. Jain Quality of experience , 2004, IEEE MultiMedia.

[38]  GaitJason An Aspect of Aesthetics in Human-Computer Communications , 1985 .

[39]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[40]  Jonathan Klein,et al.  Frustrating the user on purpose: a step toward building an affective computer , 2002, Interact. Comput..

[41]  Masaaki Kurosu,et al.  Apparent usability vs. inherent usability: experimental analysis on the determinants of the apparent usability , 1995, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[42]  Mel Yamamoto,et al.  The impact of product aesthetics on the evaluation of industrial products , 1994 .

[43]  D. B. Botkin An ecologist's ideas about landscape beauty: beauty in art and scenery as influenced by science and ideology. , 2001 .

[44]  P. Jordan Human factors for pleasure in product use. , 1998, Applied ergonomics.

[45]  Gerald C. Cupchik,et al.  Emerging visions of the aesthetic process : psychology, semiology, and philosophy , 1995 .

[46]  Paul-Alan Johnson,et al.  The Theory of Architecture: Concepts Themes & Practices , 1993 .

[47]  C. Martindale,et al.  Aesthetic preference: Anomalous findings for Berlyne's psychobiological theory. , 1990 .

[48]  Thomas H. Leahey,et al.  Emerging Visions of the Aesthetic Process: Psychology, Semiology, and Philosophy. , 1994 .

[49]  Rosedith Sitgreaves Bowker Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences , 1983 .

[50]  Harold Osborne Aesthetics in the modern world , 1970 .

[51]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Flow. The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York (HarperPerennial) 1990. , 1990 .

[52]  Graham K. Rand,et al.  Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences , 1983 .

[53]  R. E. Robinson,et al.  The art of seeing : an interpretation of the aesthetic encounter , 1993 .

[54]  George Mather The Psychology of Art , 1994 .

[55]  Kristiina Karvonen,et al.  The beauty of simplicity , 2000, CUU '00.

[56]  N. Tractinsky,et al.  What is beautiful is usable , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[57]  Francis Sparshott,et al.  The Structure of Aesthetics. , 1965 .

[58]  Gitte Lindgaard,et al.  User Satisfaction, Aesthetics and Usability: Beyond Reductionism , 2002, Usability.

[59]  P. Jordan,et al.  Pleasure With Products : Beyond Usability , 2002 .

[60]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Measuring Information Systems Service Quality: Lessons From Two Longitudinal Case Studies , 1998, MIS Q..

[61]  Stephen Kaplan,et al.  Perception and landscape: Conceptions and misconceptions. , 1979 .

[62]  Rudolf Arnheim,et al.  The other Gustav Theodor Fechner. , 1985 .

[63]  Bo N. Schenkman,et al.  Aesthetics and preferences of web pages , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[64]  J. Russell,et al.  A Description of the Affective Quality Attributed to Environments , 1980 .

[65]  Peter H. Bloch Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response , 1995 .

[66]  Hanno-Walter Kruft,et al.  A History of Architectural Theory: From Vitruvius to the Present , 1994 .

[67]  Harold Osborne,et al.  AESTHETICS AS A BRANCH OF PHILOSOPHY , 1960 .

[68]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Sample size in factor analysis. , 1999 .

[69]  Lauralee Alben,et al.  Quality of experience: defining the criteria for effective interaction design , 1996, INTR.

[70]  J. Webster,et al.  The Dimensionality and Correlates of Flow in Human-Computer Interactions. , 1993 .

[71]  Adam S. Wilkins But is it science? , 1995, Nature.

[72]  Cameron N. McIntosh,et al.  Report on the Construct Validity of the Temporal Satisfaction With Life Scale , 2001 .

[73]  B. Byrne Book Review: Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming , 1994 .

[74]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[75]  T WatsonRichard,et al.  Measuring information systems service quality , 1997 .

[76]  Guy Sircello,et al.  A new theory of beauty , 1975 .

[77]  J. Russell,et al.  An approach to environmental psychology , 1974 .

[78]  van der HeijdenHans Factors influencing the usage of websites , 2003 .

[79]  S. Koch,et al.  A Century of Psychology As Science , 1992 .

[80]  Keith A. Butler,et al.  Usability engineering turns 10 , 1996, INTR.

[81]  Rudolf Arnheim,et al.  Toward a Psychology of Art , 1967 .

[82]  John P. Campbell,et al.  Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences. , 1983 .

[83]  S. Presser,et al.  Survey Questions: Handcrafting the Standardized Questionnaire. , 1988 .

[84]  Allen I. Huffcutt,et al.  A Review and Evaluation of Exploratory Factor Analysis Practices in Organizational Research , 2003 .

[85]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[86]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Aesthetics and apparent usability: empirically assessing cultural and methodological issues , 1997, CHI.

[87]  Katherine Ralls,et al.  But Is It Science? , 1995, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[88]  Richard J. Colwell Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward An Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation , 1975 .

[89]  Morgan Jennings,et al.  Theory and models for creating engaging and immersive ecommerce Websites , 2000, SIGCPR '00.

[90]  S. Bell Can a fresh look at the psychology of perception and the philosophy of aesthetics contribute to the better management of forest landscapes , 2001 .

[91]  Frans Boselie,et al.  The Golden Section has no Special Aesthetic Attractivity! , 1992 .

[92]  P. Kotler,et al.  DESIGN: A POWERFUL BUT NEGLECTED STRATEGIC TOOL , 1984 .

[93]  R. Pickford Psychology and visual aesthetics , 1972 .

[94]  Anke Oostendorp,et al.  Dimensions in the perception of architecture:I. Identification and interpretation of dimensions of similarity , 1978 .

[95]  Gordon Graham,et al.  Aesthetics: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Art , 1988 .

[96]  Sean Larrangton-White Midm Designing Web Usability: The practice of simplicity , 2001 .

[97]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in The Netherlands , 2003, Inf. Manag..