Until a few decades ago, text has been the major mode used to teach scientific material and books have been the major teaching tool (Moreno, Mayer, Spires, & Lester, 2001). But, since scientists made microscopic phenomena visible by creating images of atoms, molecular structures, crystal formations, chemical bonding, cellules and electrical circuits, soon its use was found in science education. The use of visualizations in science and science education, especially in chemistry, has ever-increasing during the last decades. Nowadays, visualizations are a part of scientific practice that could influence science education (Linn, 2003). This author argues that visualizations can help experts to test new ideas and reveal certain aspects of scientific phenomena displaying new insights and allow comparisons with different scenarios. By other hand, visualizations are also important to students as they can illustrate an idea that words cannot describe and in the same way can introduces students to important aspects of scientific research that are frequently neglected in science education. With the development of ICT (Information and communication technology) the use of visualizations has increase strongly, both in science and science education. The number and type of visualizations available have extended and its access became much easier. According to Moreno and Mayer (2007), it considers visualizations the non-verbal mode of represent content knowledge, which includes photos, illustrations, graphics, drawings, maps, animations, simulations and video. Throughout technology it is possible to combine verbal and non-verbal modes and create multimedia or multimodal (Moreno & Mayer, 2007) learning environments. These learning environments represent knowledge in to different modes (verbal and non-verbal) and frequently use two modalities: auditory and visual, i.e., through the ears and through Celeste Ferreira University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal Mónica Baptista University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal Agnaldo Arroio University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil Abstract. Since the widespread introduction of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in education the use of multimedia environments has increased substantially. This qualitative study analyse how teachers integrate multimedia tools into teaching and learning sequences (TLS) in science education. Four in-service teachers’ groups have been investigated across a 40 h teachers’ training course to analyse their pedagogical strategies and difficulties for introducing multimedia tools in science teaching. During the training program to discuss multimedia environments teachers (n=14) were invited to build teaching learning sequences (TLS) about some science content using multimedia tools. The results obtained through a content analysis suggest that these teachers are integrating multimedia tools mostly to enhance particular concepts and skills (integrated approach) than to innovate presentations (enhancement approach). In all cases teachers adopted structured tasks and in two of these they were not aware of the necessity to make explicit links between the multimedia tools and the other activities. Some difficulties related to pedagogical approaches and teachers’ knowledge are discussed.
[1]
Alfred Bork,et al.
Multimedia in Learning
,
2001
.
[2]
Agnaldo Arroio,et al.
Context Based Learning: A Role for Cinema in Science Education.
,
2010
.
[3]
Khalid Bingimlas.
Barriers to the Successful Integration of ICT in Teaching and Learning Environments: A Review of the Literature
,
2009
.
[4]
S. Hennessy,et al.
Literature Review in Science Education and the Role of ICT: Promise, Problems and Future Directions
,
2003
.
[5]
Gren Ireson,et al.
Science Learning, Science Teaching
,
2000
.
[6]
Jean Hartley,et al.
Case study research
,
2004
.
[7]
Marcia C. Linn,et al.
Technology and science education: Starting points, research programs, and trends
,
2003
.
[8]
K. Schoepp.
Barriers to Technology Integration in a Technology-Rich Environment
,
2005
.
[9]
R. Yin.
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
,
1984
.
[10]
John Sweller,et al.
Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning
,
1988,
Cogn. Sci..
[11]
John K. Gilbert,et al.
Visualization in science education
,
2005
.
[12]
Sharonette Wallen-Robinson,et al.
Technology-mediated learning: A Jamaican context
,
2011
.
[13]
Matthew J. Koehler,et al.
What Happens When Teachers Design Educational Technology? The Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge
,
2005
.
[14]
David N. Rapp,et al.
Mental Models: Theoretical Issues for Visualizations in Science Education
,
2005
.
[15]
Leonard Newton,et al.
Teaching Science with ICT
,
2001
.
[16]
Roy Tasker,et al.
Research into practice: visualisation of the molecular world using animations
,
2006
.
[17]
Mary E. Webb.
Affordances of ICT in science learning: implications for an integrated pedagogy
,
2005
.
[18]
L. Shulman.
Those who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
,
2013
.
[19]
W M,et al.
Table of Contents
,
2020
.
[20]
R. Mayer,et al.
Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments
,
2007
.
[21]
Robert B. Kozma,et al.
The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Multimedia Learning of Chemistry
,
2005
.
[22]
A. Paivio.
Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach
,
1986
.
[23]
Agnaldo Arroio.
VISUALIZATIONS FOR NATURAL SCIENCE EDUCATION
,
2012
.
[24]
James C. Lester,et al.
The Case for Social Agency in Computer-Based Teaching: Do Students Learn More Deeply When They Interact With Animated Pedagogical Agents?
,
2001
.
[25]
Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.
The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Multimedia Learning in Games, Simulations, and Microworlds
,
2005
.
[26]
Sara Hennessy,et al.
Situated Expertise in Integrating Use of Multimedia Simulation into Secondary Science Teaching
,
2006
.