Impact of trauma center designation on outcomes: is there a difference between Level I and Level II trauma centers?

BACKGROUND Within organized trauma systems, both Level I and Level II trauma centers are expected to have the resources to treat patients with major multisystem trauma. The evidence supporting separate designations for Level I and Level II trauma centers is inconclusive. The objective of this study was to compare mortality and complications for injured patients admitted to Level I and Level II trauma centers. STUDY DESIGN Using data from the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes Study registry, we performed a retrospective observational study of 208,866 patients admitted to 28 Level I and Level II trauma centers between 2000 and 2009. Regression modeling was used to estimate the association between patient outcomes and trauma center designation, after controlling for injury severity, mechanism of injury, transfer status, and physiology. RESULTS Patients admitted to Level I trauma centers had a 15% lower odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [adj OR] 0.85; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.99) and a 35% increased odds of complications (adj OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.79). The survival benefit associated with admission to Level I centers was strongest in patients with very severe injuries (Injury Severity Score [ISS] ≥ 25; adj OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.95). Less severely injured patients with an ISS < 9 (adj OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.64 to 1.30) and with an ISS between 9 and 15 (adj OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.81 to 1.18) had similar risks of mortality in Level I and Level II trauma centers. CONCLUSIONS Severely injured patients admitted to Level I trauma centers have a lower risk of mortality compared with patients admitted to Level II centers. These findings support the continuation of a 2-tiered designation system for trauma.

[1]  S. Normand,et al.  Hospital volume and 30-day mortality for three common medical conditions. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  J Gibbs,et al.  Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Teaching and Nonteaching Hospitals in the Department of Veterans Affairs , 2001, Annals of surgery.

[3]  A. Peitzman,et al.  Outcome analysis of Pennsylvania trauma centers: factors predictive of nonsurvival in seriously injured patients. , 2001, The Journal of trauma.

[4]  H. Boshuizen,et al.  Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  A. Jha,et al.  The Association Between Hospital Volume and Processes, Outcomes, and Costs of Care for Congestive Heart Failure , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  E. Mackenzie,et al.  Complication rates among trauma centers. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[7]  C. Ko,et al.  The influence of resident involvement on surgical outcomes. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[8]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review. , 2002, JAMA.

[9]  Peter Rhee,et al.  Relationship between American College of Surgeons trauma center designation and mortality in patients with severe trauma (injury severity score > 15). , 2006, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[10]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United States , 2002 .

[11]  D. Rubin Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys , 1989 .

[12]  T. Osler,et al.  The relation between trauma center outcome and volume in the National Trauma Databank. , 2004, The Journal of trauma.

[13]  E. Mackenzie,et al.  Relationship between trauma center volume and outcomes. , 2001, JAMA.

[14]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[15]  P. Royston,et al.  Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: parsimonious parametric modelling. , 1994 .

[16]  K. Inaba,et al.  Effect of trauma center designation on outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. , 2008, Archives of surgery.

[17]  E. Mackenzie,et al.  The Impact of an Intensivist-Model ICU on Trauma-Related Mortality , 2006, Annals of surgery.

[18]  R. Aungst,et al.  Healthy People 2020 , 2013, American Journal of Kidney Diseases.

[19]  E. Hannan,et al.  An examination of the volume-mortality relationship for New York State trauma centers. , 1999, The Journal of trauma.

[20]  T. Osler,et al.  A Trauma Mortality Prediction Model Based on the Anatomic Injury Scale , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[21]  M. Sayre,et al.  Level I versus Level II trauma centers: an outcomes-based assessment. , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[22]  D. Trunkey,et al.  Outcome of hospitalized injured patients after institution of a trauma system in an urban area. , 1994, JAMA.

[23]  D. Angus,et al.  Assessing the feasibility of the American College of Surgeons' benchmarks for the triage of trauma patients. , 2011, Archives of surgery.

[24]  Daniel O Scharfstein,et al.  A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  S. Lemeshow,et al.  Association between Critical Care Physician Management and Patient Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[26]  T. Osler,et al.  In a mature trauma system, there is no difference in outcome (survival) between Level I and Level II trauma centers. , 2011, The Journal of trauma.

[27]  F P Rivara,et al.  The effect of organized systems of trauma care on motor vehicle crash mortality. , 2000, JAMA.

[28]  Peter Rhee,et al.  The Effect of Trauma Center Designation and Trauma Volume on Outcome in Specific Severe Injuries , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[29]  Yu‐Chu Shen,et al.  Rising closures of hospital trauma centers disproportionately burden vulnerable populations. , 2011, Health affairs.