Multi-frequency differential image enhancement of nanosized ultrasound contrast agents

Aim of the present work was to perform a detailed experimental investigation on the applicability ranges of a novel ultrasound (US) imaging method, that has been recently proposed by our research group in order to facilitate the detection of targeted nanosized contrast agents on diagnostic echographic images. In our previous investigation, in fact, we demonstrated the possibility of selectively suppressing non-contrast echoes in US images through a new contrast detection protocol, including a novel broadband pulse sequence employing two different US frequencies and a two-step image processing algorithm. Feasibility of this approach was preliminarily verified on 330-nm silica nanospheres (SiNSs) dispersed in agarose gel phantoms. In the present work, we investigated the effectiveness of the same approach employing a different clinically-available echographic device and adding the following new experimental conditions: 1) two further sizes of SiNSs (160 nm and 660 nm) were tested; 2) the effects of lower levels of incident acoustic pressure were studied; 3) a different couple of lower US frequencies was employed. Obtained results demonstrated that the proposed method can be effectively applied to enhance the presence of SiNSs in the whole range 160-660 nm employing US pulses at conventional diagnostic frequencies and it seemed particularly suited to be employed in combination with low acoustic pressures. Furthermore, the tested imaging technique shows very promising perspectives for a prompt translation into clinical contexts, given its suitability for real-time imaging with constant spatial resolution employing commercially-available echographic devices.

[1]  Francesco Conversano,et al.  Magnetic/Silica Nanocomposites as Dual‐Mode Contrast Agents for Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasonography , 2011 .

[2]  Francesco Conversano,et al.  Effectiveness of Functionalized Nanosystems for Multimodal Molecular Sensing and Imaging in Medicine , 2013, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[3]  Aimé Lay-Ekuakille,et al.  Multiparametric Evaluation of the Acoustic Behavior of Halloysite Nanotubes for Medical Echographic Image Enhancement , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[4]  K J Wolf,et al.  Phase-inversion sonography during the liver-specific late phase of contrast enhancement: improved detection of liver metastases. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  Francesco Conversano,et al.  In Vitro Evaluation and Theoretical Modeling of the Dissolution Behavior of a Microbubble Contrast Agent for Ultrasound Imaging , 2012, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[6]  Shelton D Caruthers,et al.  Nanotechnological applications in medicine. , 2007, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[7]  W. Stöber,et al.  Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range , 1968 .

[8]  Xueliang Pan,et al.  Nanoparticles as image enhancing agents for ultrasonography , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  P. Burns,et al.  Pulse inversion imaging of liver blood flow: improved method for characterizing focal masses with microbubble contrast. , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[10]  H. Maeda,et al.  Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review. , 2000, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[11]  Werner Jaschke,et al.  Molecular imaging with nanoparticles: giant roles for dwarf actors , 2008, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[12]  R. Weissleder,et al.  Imaging in the era of molecular oncology , 2008, Nature.

[13]  R. Jain,et al.  Regulation of transport pathways in tumor vessels: role of tumor type and microenvironment. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Francesco Conversano,et al.  A novel dual-frequency method for selective ultrasound imaging of targeted nanoparticles , 2011, 2011 IEEE SENSORS Proceedings.

[15]  Francesco Conversano,et al.  Optimal Enhancement Configuration of Silica Nanoparticles for Ultrasound Imaging and Automatic Detection at Conventional Diagnostic Frequencies , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[16]  R. Y. Chiao,et al.  Subharmonic Imaging with Microbubble Contrast Agents: Initial Results , 1999, Ultrasonic imaging.

[17]  N de Jong,et al.  Ultrasound contrast imaging: current and new potential methods. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  Francesco Conversano,et al.  Echographic detectability of optoacoustic signals from low-concentration PEG-coated gold nanorods , 2012, International journal of nanomedicine.

[19]  A. Bouakaz,et al.  Contrast agent response to chirp reversal: simulations, optical observations, and acoustical verification , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[20]  Scott C. Brown,et al.  Nanoparticles as contrast agents for in-vivo bioimaging: current status and future perspectives , 2011, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[21]  Aimé Lay-Ekuakille,et al.  Harmonic Ultrasound Imaging of Nanosized Contrast Agents for Multimodal Molecular Diagnoses , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[22]  N de Jong,et al.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements. , 1992, Ultrasonics.

[23]  Francesco Conversano,et al.  Experimental Investigations of Nonlinearities and Destruction Mechanisms of an Experimental Phospholipid-Based Ultrasound Contrast Agent , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[24]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Contrast harmonic imaging. , 2002, Ultrasonics.