Angiographic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Fibrinolytics in the CLARITY-TIMI 28 Trial

Background— Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) offers pharmacological and practical advantages over unfractionated heparin (UFH). Whether these advantages translate into greater infarct-related artery patency and fewer adverse clinical events in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) receiving fibrinolytic therapy remains under study. Methods and Results— We compared angiographic and clinical outcomes in patients treated with LMWH (n=1429) versus UFH (n=1431) in CLARITY-TIMI 28, a randomized trial of clopidogrel versus placebo in STEMI patients aged 18 to 75 years undergoing fibrinolysis. After comprehensive adjustment for baseline characteristics, therapeutic interventions, and a propensity score, treatment with LMWH was associated with a significantly lower rate of a closed infarct-related artery or death or myocardial infarction before angiography (13.5% versus 22.5%, adjusted OR 0.76, P=0.027). Treatment with LMWH was also associated with a significantly lower rate of cardiovascular death or recurrent myocardial infarction through 30 days (6.9% versus 11.5%, adjusted OR 0.68, P=0.030). The lower event rates were observed in patients allocated to clopidogrel and in those who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Rates of TIMI major bleeding through 30 days (1.6% versus 2.2%, P=0.27) and intracranial hemorrhage (0.6% versus 0.8%, P=0.37) were similar in the LMWH and UFH groups. Patients who received both clopidogrel and LMWH, in addition to a standard fibrinolytic and aspirin, had a particularly high rate of infarct-related artery patency (90.9%) and particularly low rates of cardiovascular death (3.2%), recurrent myocardial infarction (3.0%), and major bleeding (1.8%). Conclusions— In patients with STEMI receiving fibrinolytic therapy, use of LMWH with other standard therapies, including clopidogrel and aspirin, is associated with improved angiographic outcomes and lower rates of major adverse cardiovascular events.

[1]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase in Combination With the Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Enoxaparin or Unfractionated Heparin in the Prehospital Setting: The Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic Regimen (ASSENT)-3 PLUS Randomized Trial in Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2003, Circulation.

[2]  K. Mann,et al.  Hemorrhagic events during therapy with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, heparin, and aspirin for acute myocardial infarction. Results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI), Phase II Trial. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[3]  J. Hirsh,et al.  Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients treated with low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  S. Shaughnessy,et al.  Do No Harm: Health Systems’ Duty to Promote Clinician Well-Being , 2022, American Journal of Hospital Medicine.

[5]  E. Antman,et al.  Predictors of the rise in vWF after ST elevation myocardial infarction: implications for treatment strategies and clinical outcome: An ENTIRE-TIMI 23 substudy. , 2005, European heart journal.

[6]  P. Rosenbaum,et al.  Invited commentary: propensity scores. , 1999, American journal of epidemiology.

[7]  H. Heidbuchel,et al.  Enoxaparin as Adjunctive Antithrombin Therapy for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results of the ENTIRE-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 23 Trial , 2002, Circulation.

[8]  F. Fernández‐Avilés,et al.  Routine invasive strategy within 24 hours of thrombolysis versus ischaemia-guided conservative approach for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (GRACIA-1): a randomised controlled trial , 2004, The Lancet.

[9]  E. Antman,et al.  Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin as antithrombin therapy in patients receiving fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Design and rationale for the Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction study 25 (E , 2005, American heart journal.

[10]  E. Vicaut,et al.  Early increase of von Willebrand factor predicts adverse outcome in unstable coronary artery disease: beneficial effects of enoxaparin. French Investigators of the ESSENCE Trial. , 1998, Circulation.

[11]  J. Hirsh.  Heparin and low-molecular weight heparins , 1992 .

[12]  S. Thompson,et al.  How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  G. Lamas,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients wi , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  E. Antman,et al.  Low-molecular-weight heparin therapy for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and during percutaneous coronary intervention: an expert consensus. , 2002, American heart journal.

[15]  B. Lewis,et al.  Effect of clopidogrel pretreatment before percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with fibrinolytics: the PCI-CLARITY study. , 2005, JAMA.

[16]  K. Coyne,et al.  Randomized Comparison of Enoxaparin, a Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin, With Unfractionated Heparin Adjunctive to Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Thrombolysis and Aspirin Second Trial of Heparin and Aspirin Reperfusion Therapy (HART II) , 2002 .

[17]  J. Nunnelee.  Low-molecular-weight heparin. , 1997, Journal of vascular nursing : official publication of the Society for Peripheral Vascular Nursing.

[18]  J. Hirsh,et al.  Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. , 2004, Chest.

[19]  R. Collins,et al.  Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45 852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial , 2005, The Lancet.

[20]  K. Coyne,et al.  Randomized Comparison of Enoxaparin, a Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin, With Unfractionated Heparin Adjunctive to Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Thrombolysis and Aspirin: Second Trial of Heparin and Aspirin Reperfusion Therapy (HART II) , 2001, Circulation.

[21]  R. Califf,et al.  Consequences of reocclusion after successful reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction. TAMI Study Group. , 1990, Circulation.

[22]  F. Verheugt,et al.  Reocclusion: the flip side of coronary thrombolysis. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  H. Hellstrom.  Consequences of reocclusion after successful reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction. , 1991, Circulation.

[24]  E. Antman,et al.  Use of low-molecular-weight heparins in the management of acute coronary artery syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2003, JAMA.

[25]  V. Hasselblad,et al.  Safety and efficacy of enoxaparin vs unfractionated heparin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes who receive tirofiban and aspirin: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[26]  E. Antman.  The Search for Replacements for Unfractionated Heparin , 2001, Circulation.

[27]  E. Ohman,et al.  Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin: mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, dosing considerations, monitoring, efficacy, and safety. , 1998, Chest.

[28]  A. Skene,et al.  Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  William R Shadish,et al.  Propensity Scores , 2005, Evaluation review.

[30]  R. Califf,et al.  Enoxaparin vs unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes managed with an intended early invasive strategy: primary results of the SYNERGY randomized trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[31]  Assent investigators.  Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in combination with enoxaparin, abciximab, or unfractionated heparin: the ASSENT-3 randomised trial in acute myocardial infarction , 2001, The Lancet.

[32]  C. Granger,et al.  Low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin) compared to unfractionated heparin as an adjunct to rt-PA (alteplase) for improvement of coronary artery patency in acute myocardial infarction-the ASSENT Plus study. , 2003, European heart journal.

[33]  O S Miettinen,et al.  Stratification by a multivariate confounder score. , 1976, American journal of epidemiology.

[34]  M. Sabatine,et al.  Design and rationale of Clopidogrel as Adjunctive Reperfusion Therapy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (CLARITY-TIMI) 28 trial. , 2005, American heart journal.