Assessment of soil organic carbon at local scale with spiked NIR calibrations: effects of selection and extra-weighting on the spiking subset

Summary Spiking is a useful approach to improve the accuracy of regional or national calibrations when they are used to predict at local scales. To do this, a small subset of local samples (spiking subset) is added to recalibrate the initial calibration. If the spiking subset is small in comparison with the size of the initial calibration set, then it could have little noticeable effect and a small improvement can be expected. For these reasons, we hypothesized that the accuracy of the spiked calibrations can be improved when the spiking subset is extra-weighted. We also hypothesized that the spiking subset selection and the initial calibration size could affect the accuracy of the recalibrated models. To test these hypotheses, we evaluated different strategies to select the best spiking subset, with and without extra-weighting, to spike three different-sized initial calibrations. These calibrations were used to predict the soil organic carbon (SOC) content in samples from four target sites. Our results confirmed that spiking improved the prediction accuracy of the initial calibrations, with any differences depending on the spiking subset used. The best results were obtained when the spiking subset contained local samples evenly distributed in the spectral space, regardless of the initial calibration's characteristics. The accuracy was improved significantly when the spiking subset was extra-weighted. For medium- and large-sized initial calibrations, the improvement from extra-weighting was larger than that caused by the increase in spiking subset size. Similar accuracies were obtained using small- and large-sized calibrations, suggesting that incipient spectral libraries could be useful if the spiking subset is properly selected and extra-weighted. When small-sized spiking subsets were used, the predictions were more accurate than those obtained with ‘geographically-local’ models. Overall, our results indicate that we can minimize the efforts needed to use near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy effectively for SOC assessment at local scales.

[1]  T. Næs,et al.  Selection of Samples for Calibration , 1994 .

[2]  Bruce R. Kowalski,et al.  Weighting schemes for updating regression models—a theoretical approach , 1999 .

[3]  A. Walkley,et al.  AN EXAMINATION OF THE DEGTJAREFF METHOD FOR DETERMINING SOIL ORGANIC MATTER, AND A PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF THE CHROMIC ACID TITRATION METHOD , 1934 .

[4]  Mats Söderström,et al.  Increased sample point density in farm soil mapping by local calibration of visible and near infrared prediction models , 2010 .

[5]  Oxana Ye. Rodionova,et al.  Subset selection strategy , 2008 .

[6]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Using a legacy soil sample to develop a mid-IR spectral library , 2008 .

[7]  E. Ferguson.  In Situ Measurements , 1982 .

[8]  C. D. Christy,et al.  Real-time measurement of soil attributes using on-the-go near infrared reflectance spectroscopy , 2008 .

[9]  James B. Reeves,et al.  The potential of mid- and near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for determining major- and trace-element concentrations in soils from a geochemical survey of North America. , 2009 .

[10]  César Guerrero,et al.  Spiking of NIR regional models using samples from target sites: effect of model size on prediction accuracy. , 2010 .

[11]  Pierre Dardenne,et al.  Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy for Estimating Soil Characteristics Valuable in the Diagnosis of Soil Fertility , 2011 .

[12]  B. Minasny,et al.  Regional transferability of mid-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopic prediction for soil chemical properties , 2009 .

[13]  Abdul Mounem Mouazen,et al.  Effect of spiking strategy and ratio on calibration of on-line visible and near infrared soil sensor for measurement in European farms , 2013 .

[14]  Ing-Marie Olsson,et al.  D-optimal onion designs in statistical molecular design , 2004 .

[15]  P. Miller,et al.  Validation requirements for diffuse reflectance soil characterization models with a case study of VNIR soil C prediction in Montana , 2005 .

[16]  James B. Reeves,et al.  Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy for the Analysis of Agricultural Soils , 1999 .

[17]  David J. Brown.  Using a global VNIR soil-spectral library for local soil characterization and landscape modeling in a 2nd-order Uganda watershed , 2007 .

[18]  Christian R. Mora,et al.  On the selection of samples for multivariate regression analysis : application to near-infrared (NIR) calibration models for the prediction of pulp yield in Eucalyptus nitens , 2008 .

[19]  René Gislum,et al.  Selection of representative calibration sample sets for near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy to predict nitrogen concentration in grasses , 2012 .

[20]  Rick L. Lawrence,et al.  Comparing local vs. global visible and near-infrared (VisNIR) diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) calibrations for the prediction of soil clay, organic C and inorganic C , 2008 .

[21]  R. V. Rossel,et al.  Visible and near infrared spectroscopy in soil science , 2010 .

[22]  Beata Walczak,et al.  Selection and weighting of samples in multivariate regression model updating , 2005 .

[23]  K. Shepherd,et al.  Global soil characterization with VNIR diffuse reflectance spectroscopy , 2006 .

[24]  Ross S. Bricklemyer,et al.  On-the-go VisNIR: Potential and limitations for mapping soil clay and organic carbon , 2010 .

[25]  K. Shepherd,et al.  Development of Reflectance Spectral Libraries for Characterization of Soil Properties , 2002 .

[26]  B. Stenberg,et al.  USE OF NEAR INFRARED REFLECTANCE SPECTRA OF SOILS FOR OBJECTIVE SELECTION OF SAMPLES , 1995 .

[27]  A Garrido-Varo,et al.  Non-linear regression methods in NIRS quantitative analysis. , 2007, Talanta.

[28]  Andreas Hueni,et al.  The use of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for in situ carbon and nitrogen analysis of pastoral soils , 2008 .

[29]  L. Blair.  A prediction. , 1995, Hospitals & health networks.

[30]  Claudy Jolivet,et al.  Optimization criteria in sample selection step of local regression for quantitative analysis of large soil NIRS database , 2012 .

[31]  G. Puchwein.  Selection of calibration samples for near-infrared spectrometry by factor analysis of spectra , 1988 .

[32]  Richard Webster,et al.  Predicting soil properties from the Australian soil visible–near infrared spectroscopic database , 2012 .

[33]  Raphael A. Viscarra Rossel,et al.  The Soil Spectroscopy Group and the Development of a Global Soil Spectral Library , 2009 .

[34]  L. Janik,et al.  Soil properties prediction of western Mediterranean islands with similar climatic environments by means of mid‐infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy , 2010 .

[35]  John S. Shenk,et al.  Population Definition, Sample Selection, and Calibration Procedures for Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy , 1991 .

[36]  M. Bernoux,et al.  Prediction of soil organic and inorganic carbon contents at a national scale (France) using mid‐infrared reflectance spectroscopy (MIRS) , 2012 .

[37]  B. Stenberg,et al.  Near‐infrared spectroscopy for within‐field soil characterization: small local calibrations compared with national libraries spiked with local samples , 2010 .

[38]  R. V. Rossel,et al.  In situ measurements of soil colour, mineral composition and clay content by vis–NIR spectroscopy , 2009 .

[39]  Keith D. Shepherd,et al.  The prediction of soil carbon fractions using mid-infrared-partial least square analysis , 2007 .

[40]  L. A. Stone,et al.  Computer Aided Design of Experiments , 1969 .

[41]  A. McBratney,et al.  Near-infrared (NIR) and mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopic techniques for assessing the amount of carbon stock in soils – Critical review and research perspectives , 2011 .