High-yield oil palm expansion spares land at the expense of forests in the Peruvian Amazon

High-yield agriculture potentially reduces pressure on forests by requiring less land to increase production. Using satellite and field data, we assessed the area deforested by industrial-scale high-yield oil palm expansion in the Peruvian Amazon from 2000 to 2010, finding that 72% of new plantations expanded into forested areas. In a focus area in the Ucayali region, we assessed deforestation for high- and smallholder low-yield oil palm plantations. Low-yield plantations accounted for most expansion overall (80%), but only 30% of their expansion involved forest conversion, contrasting with 75% for high-yield expansion. High-yield expansion minimized the total area required to achieve production but counter-intuitively at higher expense to forests than low-yield plantations. The results show that high-yield agriculture is an important but insufficient strategy to reduce pressure on forests. We suggest that high-yield agriculture can be effective in sparing forests only if coupled with incentives for agricultural expansion into already cleared lands.

[1]  L. P. Koh,et al.  Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity? , 2008 .

[2]  D. Edwards,et al.  The high value of logged tropical forests: lessons from northern Borneo , 2010, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[3]  E. Schmid,et al.  Impacts of population growth, economic development, and technical change on global food production and consumption , 2011 .

[4]  Alexandra C Morel,et al.  How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity? , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  J. Clay Freeze the footprint of food , 2011, Nature.

[6]  L. Hannah,et al.  No Forest Left Behind , 2007, PLoS biology.

[7]  Dieter Gerten,et al.  The economic potential of bioenergy for climate change mitigation with special attention given to implications for the land system , 2011 .

[8]  G. Berndes,et al.  How much land is needed for global food production under scenarios of dietary changes and livestock productivity increases in 2030 , 2010 .

[9]  Andrew Balmford,et al.  Farming and the Fate of Wild Nature , 2005, Science.

[10]  D. Edwards,et al.  Degraded lands worth protecting: the biological importance of Southeast Asia's repeatedly logged forests , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  F. Achard,et al.  Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Pamela A Matson,et al.  Agricultural Intensification: Will Land Spared from Farming be Land Spared for Nature? , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[13]  L. P. Koh,et al.  Spatially explicit scenario analysis for reconciling agricultural expansion, forest protection, and carbon conservation in Indonesia , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  G. Powell,et al.  High-resolution forest carbon stocks and emissions in the Amazon , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Paul C. West,et al.  Trading carbon for food: Global comparison of carbon stocks vs. crop yields on agricultural land , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  L. Verchot,et al.  Opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in tropical peatlands , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Youshouzhai Gu Echo , 1980, The Craft of Poetry.

[18]  A. Angelsen Policies for reduced deforestation and their impact on agricultural production , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  William F. Laurance,et al.  Is Oil Palm the Next Emerging Threat to the Amazon? , 2009 .

[20]  H. D. Cooper,et al.  Scenarios for Global Biodiversity in the 21st Century , 2010, Science.

[21]  J. Barlow,et al.  The value of primary, secondary and plantation forests for Amazonian birds. , 2007 .