State-Dependent Perceptual Learning

Learning constitutes a fundamental property of the human brain—yet an unresolved puzzle is the profound variability of the learning success between individuals. Here we highlight the relevance of individual ongoing brain states as sources of the learning variability in exposure-based somatosensory perceptual learning. Electroencephalogram recordings of ongoing rhythmic brain activity before and during learning revealed that prelearning parietal alpha oscillations as well as during-learning stimulus-induced contralateral central alpha changes are predictive for the learning outcome. These two distinct alpha rhythm sources predicted up to 64% of the observed learning variability, one source representing an idling state with posteroparietal focus and a potential link to the default mode network, the other representing the sensorimotor mu rhythm, whose desynchronization is indicative for the degree of engagement of sensorimotor neuronal populations during application of the learning stimuli. Unspecific effects due to global shifts of attention or vigilance do not explain our observations. Our study thus suggests a brain state-dependency of perceptual learning success in humans opening new avenues for supportive learning tools in the clinical and educational realms.

[1]  T. Poggio,et al.  Fast perceptual learning in hyperacuity , 1995, Vision Research.

[2]  H. Dinse,et al.  Functional Imaging of Perceptual Learning in Human Primary and Secondary Somatosensory Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[3]  O. Jensen,et al.  Prestimulus alpha and mu activity predicts failure to inhibit motor responses , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[4]  Barbara F. Händel,et al.  Top-Down Controlled Alpha Band Activity in Somatosensory Areas Determines Behavioral Performance in a Discrimination Task , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Alpha frequency, cognitive load and memory performance , 1993, Brain Topography.

[6]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  α-Band Electroencephalographic Activity over Occipital Cortex Indexes Visuospatial Attention Bias and Predicts Visual Target Detection , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Gert Pfurtscheller,et al.  The cortical activation model (CAM). , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[8]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution , 1995, Neural Computation.

[9]  Marcus E Raichle,et al.  Neuroscience. The brain's dark energy. , 2006, Science.

[10]  W. Maass,et al.  State-dependent computations: spatiotemporal processing in cortical networks , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  Arno Villringer,et al.  Influence of ongoing alpha rhythm on the visual evoked potential , 2008, NeuroImage.

[12]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Individual variability in functional connectivity predicts performance of a perceptual task , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Top-Down Reorganization of Activity in the Visual Pathway after Learning a Shape Identification Task , 2005, Neuron.

[14]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in posterior alpha-band EEG activity reflect variability in excitability of human visual areas. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  F. Varela,et al.  Neuromagnetic imaging of cortical oscillations accompanying tactile stimulation. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Intrinsic Fluctuations within Cortical Systems Account for Intertrial Variability in Human Behavior , 2007, Neuron.

[17]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Learning to see: experience and attention in primary visual cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Dean V Buonomano,et al.  Influence of the interstimulus interval on temporal processing and learning: testing the state-dependent network model , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  O. Jensen,et al.  Shaping Functional Architecture by Oscillatory Alpha Activity: Gating by Inhibition , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[20]  Patrick Ragert,et al.  Differential effects of tactile high- and low-frequency stimulation on tactile discrimination in human subjects , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.

[21]  O. Jensen,et al.  Asymmetric Amplitude Modulations of Brain Oscillations Generate Slow Evoked Responses , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Brain Connectivity Related to Working Memory Performance , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Alpha frequency and memory performance , 1990 .

[24]  Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al.  Spontaneous local variations in ongoing neural activity bias perceptual decisions , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  John Suckling,et al.  Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  William Gaetz,et al.  Localization of sensorimotor cortical rhythms induced by tactile stimulation using spatially filtered MEG , 2006, NeuroImage.

[27]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  Advances in visual perceptual learning and plasticity , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Dynamics of Ongoing Activity: Explanation of the Large Variability in Evoked Cortical Responses , 1996, Science.

[29]  Patrick Ragert,et al.  Tactile coactivation resets age‐related decline of human tactile discrimination , 2006, Annals of neurology.

[30]  Patrick Ragert,et al.  Sustained increase of somatosensory cortex excitability by tactile coactivation studied by paired median nerve stimulation in humans correlates with perceptual gain , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  A. Villringer,et al.  How Ongoing Neuronal Oscillations Account for Evoked fMRI Variability , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  K. Linkenkaer-Hansen,et al.  Prestimulus Oscillations Enhance Psychophysical Performance in Humans , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Learning sculpts the spontaneous activity of the resting human brain , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  W. Klimesch,et al.  EEG alpha oscillations: The inhibition–timing hypothesis , 2007, Brain Research Reviews.

[35]  Amra Hodzic,et al.  Improvement and Decline in Tactile Discrimination Behavior after Cortical Plasticity Induced by Passive Tactile Coactivation , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  A common framework for perceptual learning , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[37]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[38]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[39]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  Perceptual learning without perception , 2001, Nature.

[40]  B. Godde,et al.  Tactile Coactivation-Induced Changes in Spatial Discrimination Performance , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  G. Deco,et al.  Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[42]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  D. McCormick,et al.  Neocortical Network Activity In Vivo Is Generated through a Dynamic Balance of Excitation and Inhibition , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  Now You'll Feel It, Now You Won't: EEG Rhythms Predict the Effectiveness of Perceptual Masking , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[46]  A. Karim,et al.  Brain Oscillatory Substrates of Visual Short-Term Memory Capacity , 2009, Current Biology.

[47]  H. Dinse,et al.  Shifts in cortical representations predict human discrimination improvement , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  H. Dinse,et al.  Pharmacological Modulation of Perceptual Learning and Associated Cortical Reorganization , 2003, Science.

[49]  Gabriel Curio,et al.  Role of neuronal synchrony in the generation of evoked EEG/MEG responses. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  Hubert R. Dinse,et al.  Improvement and Impairment of Visually Guided Behavior through LTP- and LTD-like Exposure-Based Visual Learning , 2011, Current Biology.

[51]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[52]  Wolfgang Klimesch,et al.  The Functional Significance of Absolute Power with Respect to Event-Related Desynchronization , 2004, Brain Topography.

[53]  M. Boly,et al.  Baseline brain activity fluctuations predict somatosensory perception in humans , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  M. Raichle The Brain's Dark Energy , 2006, Science.

[55]  M Fahle,et al.  Interobserver variance in perceptual performance and learning. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.