ID-D-16-00024 394..399

I mplant-supported restorations present a plethora of components for crown fixation, for example, screw-retained crowns and cemented crowns. Cemented crowns show better adaptation and less occlusal deformity, which inevitably occurs with the former, because of the presence of an orifice for screw access and crown fixation. This situation is further aggravated when esthetics are involved, especially in the anterior teeth. The screw system has the advantage of easy access for crown removal for occasional repairs without damaging the remaining components. Removal of cemented crowns can compromise osseointegration because of excessive application of force. The use of temporary cements is therefore recommended by some authors to remedy the irreversibility of the cemented crown system.

[1]  A. Uludamar,et al.  Effects of thermocycling on the retention of various cements of one-unit and three-unit fixed implant-supported restorations. , 2012, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[2]  F. Nejatidanesh,et al.  Retentiveness of implant-supported metal copings using different luting agents , 2012, Dental research journal.

[3]  S. Matalon,et al.  An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns. , 2011, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  N. Yılmaz,et al.  Luting Agent Effectiveness on Implant Crown Retention , 2011 .

[5]  L. Watanabe,et al.  The effects of an airborne-particle abrasion and silica-coating on the bond strength between grooved titanium alloy temporary cylinders and provisional veneering materials. , 2011, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  M. Kern,et al.  Retention of prefabricated titanium dowels cemented with three luting resins. , 2010, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[7]  D. Morton,et al.  Effects of a cementing technique in addition to luting agent on the uniaxial retention force of a single-tooth implant-supported restoration: an in vitro study. , 2010, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[8]  L. Richards,et al.  Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments. , 2008, Australian dental journal.

[9]  Aldir Machado,et al.  Tensile Strength of Cementing Agents on the CeraOne System of Dental Prosthesis on Implants , 2008, Implant dentistry.

[10]  R. Basting,et al.  Assessment of the tensile strength of hexagonal abutments using different cementing agents. , 2008, Brazilian oral research.

[11]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Bond durability of composite luting agents to ceramic when exposed to long-term thermocycling. , 2007, Operative dentistry.

[12]  L. Ramp,et al.  Retention and leakage of implant-supported restorations luted with provisional cement: a pilot study. , 2007, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[13]  M. Kern,et al.  Retention forces and seating discrepancies of implant-retained castings after cementation. , 2006, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[14]  Perng-Ru Liu,et al.  Comparison of 7 luting protocols and their effect on the retention and marginal leakage of a cement-retained dental implant restoration. , 2006, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[15]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns. , 2006, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  Luiz Carlos Santiago,et al.  Retention of provisional crowns cemented with eight temporary cements: comparative study. , 2004, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[17]  H. Iplikçioğlu,et al.  Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns. , 2002, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[18]  C. Francischone,et al.  Effects of different types of temporary cements on the tensile strength and marginal adaptation of crowns on implants. , 2002, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[19]  H. B. Dumbrigue,et al.  Techniques to minimize excess luting agent in cement-retained implant restorations. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[20]  J. P. Duncan,et al.  Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components. , 2001, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[21]  S. Koka,et al.  Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[22]  C. C. Wang,et al.  Retentive and compressive strengths of modified zinc oxide-eugenol cements. , 2000, Journal of dentistry.

[23]  L. Breeding,et al.  Tensile bond strengths of provisional luting agents used with an implant system. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[24]  S. Rosenstiel,et al.  Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[25]  C. Driscoll,et al.  The effect of luting agents on the retention and marginal adaptation of the CeraOne implant system. , 1997, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[26]  K S Hebel,et al.  Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. , 1997, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.