Outcomes associated with matching patients' treatment preferences to physicians' recommendations: study methodology

BackgroundPatients often express strong preferences for the forms of treatment available for their disease. Incorporating these preferences into the process of treatment decision-making might improve patients' adherence to treatment, contributing to better outcomes. We describe the methodology used in a study aiming to assess treatment outcomes when patients' preferences for treatment are closely matched to recommended treatments.MethodParticipants included patients with moderate and severe psoriasis attending outpatient dermatology clinics at the University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany. A self-administered online survey used conjoint analysis to measure participants' preferences for psoriasis treatment options at the initial study visit. Physicians' treatment recommendations were abstracted from each participant's medical records. The Preference Matching Index (PMI), a measure of concordance between the participant's preferences for treatment and the physician's recommended treatment, was determined for each participant at t1 (initial study visit). A clinical outcome measure, the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, and two participant-derived outcomes assessing treatment satisfaction and health related quality of life were employed at t1, t2 (twelve weeks post-t1) and t3 (twelve weeks post-t2). Change in outcomes was assessed using repeated measures analysis of variance. The association between participants' PMI scores at t1 and outcomes at t2 and t3 was evaluated using multivariate regressions analysis.DiscussionWe describe methods for capturing concordance between patients' treatment preferences and recommended treatment and for assessing its association with specific treatment outcomes. The methods are intended to promote the incorporation of patients' preferences in treatment decision-making, enhance treatment satisfaction, and improve treatment effectiveness through greater adherence.

[1]  L. Callister,et al.  Patient‐centered care and adherence: Definitions and applications to improve outcomes , 2008, Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners.

[2]  R. J. Leo,et al.  Nonadherence with psychopharmacologic treatment among psychiatric patients , 2005 .

[3]  W. Peitsch,et al.  Patient preferences for psoriasis treatments: process characteristics can outweigh outcome attributes. , 2011, Archives of dermatology.

[4]  S. Zyoud,et al.  Self-reported medication adherence and treatment satisfaction in patients with epilepsy , 2011, Epilepsy & Behavior.

[5]  E. G. Lantarel,et al.  Treatment goals in psoriasis , 2022 .

[6]  M. Suarez,et al.  Preferences , satisfaction and compliance with antiretroviral treatment : ARPAS study ( II ) , 2022 .

[7]  Stephen W Lagakos,et al.  Statistics in medicine--reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Kristen Kotter,et al.  Patient centered primary care is associated with patient hypertension medication adherence , 2011, Journal of behavioral medicine.

[9]  C. Doherty,et al.  Patients' preferences for involvement in clinical decision-making within secondary care and the factors that influence their preferences. , 2005, Journal of nursing management.

[10]  A. Finlay,et al.  Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)—a simple practical measure for routine clinical use , 1994, Clinical and experimental dermatology.

[11]  D. Kiesler,et al.  Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: evidence, models and interventions. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[12]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  R. Gallagher Evidence-based psychotherapies for depressed adolescents : A review and clinical guidelines , 2005 .

[14]  J. Steiner,et al.  Patient treatment preferences in localized prostate carcinoma: The influence of emotion, misconception, and anecdote , 2006, Cancer.

[15]  Richard Thomson,et al.  The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions—challenges for doctors , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  I. Rodríguez,et al.  Preferencias, satisfacción y adherencia con el tratamiento antirretroviral: estudio ARPAS (II) , 2007 .

[17]  M.H.A. Fadzil,et al.  Area Assessment of Psoriasis Lesion for PASI Scoring , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[18]  D. Ciraulo,et al.  Relationship between medication adherence and treatment outcomes: the COMBINE study. , 2008, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[19]  M. Atkinson,et al.  Health and Quality of Life Outcomes , 2004 .

[20]  H. Orzechowski,et al.  German evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of Psoriasis vulgaris (short version) , 2007, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[21]  K. Kragballe,et al.  Strategies for improving the quality of care in psoriasis with the use of treatment goals – a report on an implementation meeting , 2011, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[22]  A. Schotter,et al.  Endogenous Preferences : The Cultural Consequences of Markets and other Economic Institutions , 1999 .

[23]  M. Young,et al.  Health services research , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[24]  A. Hasenburg,et al.  Concordance between patients' desired and actual decision‐making roles in breast cancer care , 2008, Psycho-oncology.

[25]  Karen R. Sepucha,et al.  How to define and measure concordance between patients' preferences and medical treatments: A systematic review of approaches and recommendations for standardization. , 2010, Patient education and counseling.

[26]  P. Spuls,et al.  Patient preferences and satisfaction with systemic therapies for psoriasis: an area to be explored , 2009, The British journal of dermatology.

[27]  R. Epstein,et al.  Why the nation needs a policy push on patient-centered health care. , 2010, Health affairs.