Using Biometric Authentication to Improve Fire Ground Accountability: An Assessment of Firefighter Privacy Concerns

Two persistent resource management issues that arise in coordinated emergency response efforts are the timely delivery of accurate resource data to decision makers and effective methods for maintaining personnel accountability. Most emergency response agencies rely on manual systems to address each of these issues separately. These manual systems are often inefficient and hinder the effectiveness of the emergency response effort. Biometric authentication of firefighters holds promise as a means of improving both accurate data delivery and personnel accountability. One potential obstacle, however, is acceptance of such biometric systems by the users. In this research, we develop and pilot test an instrument for capturing firefighter privacy concerns associated with using biometric systems. Pilot test results indicate the instrument is reliable and valid for the intended purpose. Preliminary analyses of the pilot test data indicate that firefighter privacy concerns impact system acceptance. Additionally, privacy concerns vary significantly based on ethnic group.

[1]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  A Multilevel Model of Resistance to Information Technology Implementation , 2005, MIS Q..

[2]  Ronald W. Perry,et al.  Incident management systems in disaster management , 2003 .

[3]  S. Coleman.  COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF PERSONNEL ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEMS IN THE FIRE SERVICE , 2003 .

[4]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Information Privacy in a Globally Networked Society: Implications for IS Research , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Dara V. O'Neil.  Analysis of Internet Users’ Level of Online Privacy Concerns , 2001 .

[6]  R. Clarke.  Privacy as a Means of Engendering Trust in Cyberspace Commerce , 2001 .

[7]  Rhona Flin,et al.  Disaster stress: an emergency management perspective , 1999 .

[8]  Michel G. Bertrand.  PLANNING FOR A PERSONNEL ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE , 1998 .

[9]  Erik R. Eddy,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT POLICIES ON REACTIONS TO HUMAN RESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS: AN INTEGRATION OF PRIVACY AND PROCEDURAL JUSTICE PERSPECTIVES , 1999 .

[10]  John D. Woodward,et al.  Biometrics: privacy's foe or privacy's friend? , 1997, Proc. IEEE.

[11]  Woodward Jd.  Biometric scanning, law & policy: identifying the concerns--drafting the biometric blueprint. , 1997 .

[12]  J D Woodward.  Biometric scanning, law & policy: identifying the concerns--drafting the biometric blueprint. , 1997, University of Pittsburgh law review. University of Pittsburgh. School of Law.

[13]  William B. Gudykunst,et al.  The Influence of Cultural Individualism-Collectivism, Self Construals, and Individual Values on Communication Styles Across Cultures , 1996 .

[14]  H. Jeff Smith,et al.  Information Privacy: Measuring Individuals' Concerns About Organizational Practices , 1996, MIS Q..

[15]  H. Jeff Smith,et al.  Values, personal information privacy, and regulatory approaches , 1995, CACM.

[16]  T. Singelis,et al.  The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals , 1994 .

[17]  Alma T. Mintu.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1992 .

[18]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1991 .

[19]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[20]  Paul D. Tolchinsky,et al.  Employee perceptions of invasion of privacy: A field simulation experiment. , 1981 .

[21]  Dianna Lynn Stone.  The effects of the valence of outcomes for providing data and the perceived relevance of the data requested on privacy-related behaviors, beliefs, and attitudes , 1981 .

[22]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[23]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[24]  E. Kelly.  Individualism and collectivism , 1901 .