Temperature coupling and trade-off phenomena in the acoustic communication system of the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus De Geer (Gryllidae)

The effects of ambient temperature on stridulation (calling song) in males, and phonotaxis in females, were studied in the chirping cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus . In the male, temperature had the greatest effect on the syllable and chirp repetition rates. Both increased linearly with increasing temperature between 15 and 24°C; there was no effect of temperature on these temporal properties at higher temperatures (24–33°C). Syllable duration, number of syllables per chirp and dominant frequency remained relatively unaffected by changes in temperature. Stridulation and phonotaxis were temperature coupled because the female at 15, 22 and 30°C responded best to synthetic songs with syllable and chirp repetition rates that matched these temporal properties of the male9s calling song at the same temperature. The phonotactic behaviour of the female indicates that certain combinations of temporal properties in the male9s calling Song improve the female9s response at different temperatures, suggesting the presence of ‘trade-off’ phenomena in phonotaxis and pattern recognition in G. bimaculatus .

[1]  R. Alexander.  The Taxonomy of the Field Crickets of the Eastern United States (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Acheta) , 1957 .

[2]  T. J. Walker.  Specificity in the Response of Female Tree Crickets (Orthoptera, Gryllidae, Oecanthinae) to Calling Songs of the Males , 1957 .

[3]  T. J. Walker,et al.  FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION IN THE CALLING SONGS OF CRICKETS , 1962 .

[4]  T. J. Walker.  The Taxonomy and Calling Songs of United States Tree Crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Oecanthinae). I. The Genus Neoxabea and the niveus and varicornis Groups of the Genus Oecanthus , 1962 .

[5]  The Taxonomy and Calling Songs of United States Tree Crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Oecanthinae). II. The nigricornis Group of the Genus Oecanthus , 1963 .

[6]  R. Alexander,et al.  Seasonal and Daily Chirping Cycles in the Northern Spring and Fall Field Crickets, Gryllus Veletis and G. Pennsylvanicus , 1967 .

[7]  R. Hoy.  Genetic Control of Acoustic Behavior in Crickets , 1974 .

[8]  A. V. Popov,et al.  Acoustic Behaviour and Auditory System in Insects , 1974 .

[9]  A. Bulloch,et al.  Role of interflash intervals in a firefly courtship (Photinus macdermotti) , 1976, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  Temperature coupling in the vocal communication system of the treefrog, Hyla versicolor , 1977 .

[11]  R R Hoy,et al.  Hybrid cricket auditory behavior: evidence for genetic coupling in animal communication. , 1977, Science.

[12]  Hans Schneider,et al.  Acoustic Behavior and Physiology of Vocalization in the European Tree Frog, Hyla Arborea (L.) , 1977 .

[13]  A. V. Popov,et al.  Neuroethology of Acoustic Communication , 1978 .

[14]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Temperature Coupling in the Vocal Communication System of the Gray Tree Frog, Hyla versicolor , 1978, Science.

[15]  R. Hoy.  Acoustic communication in crickets: a model system for the study of feature detection. , 1978, Federation proceedings.

[16]  Hoy Rr,et al.  Acoustic communication in crickets: a model system for the study of feature detection. , 1978 .

[17]  G. Pollack,et al.  Temporal Pattern as a Cue for Species-Specific Calling Song Recognition in Crickets , 1979, Science.

[18]  H. Gerhardt.  Sound Pattern Recognition in Some North American Treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): Implications for Mate Choice , 1982 .

[19]  Franz Huber,et al.  Neural Correlates of Orthopteran and Cicada Phonotaxis , 1983 .

[20]  Acoustic communication in treefrogs , 1983 .

[21]  Neural mechanisms of auditory information processing by identified interneurones in Orthoptera , 1984 .

[22]  G. Pollack,et al.  Phonotaxis to individual rhythmic components of a complex cricket calling song , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[23]  T. J. Walker,et al.  Energetics of singing in crickets: Effect of temperature in three trilling species (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[24]  M. Zaretsky.  Specificity of the calling song and short term changes in the phonotactic response by female cricketsScapsipedus marginatus (Gryllidae) , 1972, Journal of comparative physiology.

[25]  Dagmar von Helversen.  Gesang des Männchens und Lautschema des Weibchens bei der FeldheuschreckeChorthippus biguttulus (Orthoptera, Acrididae) , 1972, Journal of comparative physiology.

[26]  U. Koch.  Analysis of cricket stridulation using miniature angle detectors , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[27]  K. G. Hill.  Carrier frequency as a factor in phonotactic behaviour of female crickets (Teleogryllus commodus) , 1974, Journal of comparative physiology.

[28]  J. Doherty,et al.  Acoustic communication in hybrid treefrogs: sound production by males and selective phonotaxis by females , 1984, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[29]  S. Boel Pedersen,et al.  Song recognition and song pattern in a shorthorned grasshopper , 1983, Journal of comparative physiology.