Suppressibility of the 2 f 1- f 2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man

The suppression tuning properties of the oto-acoustic distortion product emission, 2f1-f2 have been measured in the ear canal of gerbil and man. The results show the acoustic response to be suppressible in a similar, frequency-dependent manner in both species. Frequencies near to those of the stimulating tones are most effective in suppressing the response. Derived iso-suppression tuning curves have Q10dB values of between 1 and 6. Suppressor tones having frequencies near to f2 (the higher frequency stimulus) make a contribution to the tuning curve which is largely independent of the stimulus intensity and the frequency ratio between the two primary tones. Suppressors having f1-associated frequencies produce a variable amount of suppression depending on the stimulus parameters chosen. No specific suppression feature could be associated with suppressors near to 2f1-f2. The frequency selectivity of the acoustic DP generation mechanism shown by this study indicates a close association with the transduction mechanism. The demonstration of comparable signals in gerbil and man facilitates the direct transfer of laboratory results to the study of human ears.

[1]  E. Zwicker,et al.  Acoustical responses and suppression-period patterns in guinea pigs , 1981, Hearing Research.

[2]  David T. Kemp,et al.  Ear canal acoustic and round window electrical correlates of 2f 1- f 2 distortion generated in the cochlea , 1984, Hearing Research.

[3]  Joe C. Adams,et al.  Stimulated acoustic emissions in the ear canal of the gerbil , 1981, Hearing Research.

[4]  Cochlear microphonic evidence for mechanical propagation of distortion products (ƒ2 − ƒ1) and (2ƒ1 − ƒ2) , 1982, Hearing Research.

[5]  M. Cheatham,et al.  Two-tone interactions in the cochlear microphonic , 1982, Hearing Research.

[6]  J. P. Wilson,et al.  The Combination Tone, 2f1 – f2, in Psychophysics and Ear-Canal Recording , 1980 .

[7]  D. Kemp Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  I. J. Russell,et al.  Two-tone suppression in cochlear hair cells , 1979, Hearing Research.

[9]  J H Siegel,et al.  Cochlear nonlinear phenomena in two-tone responses. , 1979, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[10]  D. T. Kemp,et al.  Towards a model for the origin of cochlear echoes , 1980, Hearing Research.

[11]  D O Kim,et al.  Cochlear mechanics: nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  D. T. Kemp,et al.  An Integrated View of Cochlear Mechanical Nonlinearities Observable from the Ear Canal , 1983 .