Design and evaluation of an abbreviated pixelwise dynamic contrast enhancement analysis protocol for early extracellular volume fraction estimation.

INTRODUCTION T1-based method is considered as the gold standard for extracellular volume fraction (ECV) mapping. This technique requires at least a 10 min delay after injection to acquire the post injection T1 map. Quantitative analysis of Dynamic Contrast Enhancement (DCE) images could lead to an earlier estimation of an ECV like parameter (2 min). The purpose of this study was to design a quantitative pixel-wise DCE analysis workflow to assess the feasibility of an early estimation of ECV. METHODS Fourteen patients with mitral valve prolapse were included in this study. The MR protocol, performed on a 3 T MR scanner, included MOLLI sequences for T1 maps acquisition and a standard SR-turboFlash sequence for dynamic acquisition. DCE data were acquired for at least 120 s. We implemented a full DCE analysis pipeline with a pre-processing step using an innovative motion correction algorithm (RC-REG algorithm) and a post-processing step using the extended Tofts Model (ECVETM). Estimated ECVETM maps were compared to standard T1-based ECV maps (ECVT1) with both a Pearson correlation analysis and a group-wise analysis. RESULTS Image and map quality assessment showed systematic improvements using the proposed workflow. Strong correlation was found between ECVETM, and ECVT1 values (r-square = 0.87). CONCLUSION A DCE analysis workflow based on RC-REG algorithm and ETM analysis can provide good quality parametric maps. Therefore, it is possible to extract ECV values from a 2 min-long DCE acquisition that are strongly correlated with ECV values from the T1 based method.

[1]  Michael Salerno,et al.  Advances in parametric mapping with CMR imaging. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[2]  Imagerie de diffusion cardiaque : vers une nouvelle approche de l'ischémie myocardique ? , 2009 .

[3]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Accurate assessment of the arterial input function during high‐dose myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  P. Kellman,et al.  Quantitative myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease: A perfusion mapping study , 2019, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  C. Higgins,et al.  MR imaging of the myocardium using nonionic contrast medium: signal-intensity changes in patients with subacute myocardial infarction. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  E. Rostrup,et al.  Myocardial perfusion modeling using MRI , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  David Atkinson,et al.  Respiratory motion correction in dynamic MRI using robust data decomposition registration - Application to DCE-MRI , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[8]  Andriy Myronenko,et al.  Intensity-Based Image Registration by Minimizing Residual Complexity , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced first pass myocardial perfusion imaging: Correlation between myocardial blood flow in dogs at rest and during hyperemia , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Jack Lee,et al.  Robust Non-Rigid Motion Compensation of Free-Breathing Myocardial Perfusion MRI Data , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  R. Wilson,et al.  Magnetic resonance quantification of the myocardial perfusion reserve with a Fermi function model for constrained deconvolution. , 1998, Medical physics.

[12]  C. Higgins,et al.  Measurement of the distribution volume of gadopentetate dimeglumine at echo-planar MR imaging to quantify myocardial infarction: comparison with 99mTc-DTPA autoradiography in rats. , 1999, Radiology.

[13]  Nikos Paragios,et al.  Deformable Medical Image Registration: A Survey , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  E. DiBella,et al.  Quantitative myocardial distribution volume from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[16]  Sebastian Kozerke,et al.  Simple motion correction strategy reduces respiratory-induced motion artifacts for k-t accelerated and compressed-sensing cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging , 2018, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[17]  J B Bassingthwaighte,et al.  Blood-Tissue Exchange via Transport and Transformation by Capillary Endothelial Cells , 1989, Circulation research.

[18]  Steven P Sourbron,et al.  On the scope and interpretation of the Tofts models for DCE‐MRI , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  M. Hayward,et al.  Equilibrium Contrast Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for the Measurement of Diffuse Myocardial Fibrosis: Preliminary Validation in Humans , 2010, Circulation.

[20]  R. Kim,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of myocardial viability , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  Carmel Hayes,et al.  Measurement of extracellular volume and transit time heterogeneity using contrast‐enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI in patients after acute myocardial infarction , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  M. Robson,et al.  Myocardial T1 mapping and extracellular volume quantification: a Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) and CMR Working Group of the European Society of Cardiology consensus statement , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[23]  E. DiBella,et al.  Comparison of myocardial perfusion estimates from dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with four quantitative analysis methods , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Leon Axel,et al.  Theory-based signal calibration with single-point T1 measurements for first-pass quantitative perfusion MRI studies. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[25]  Farida Cheriet,et al.  Robust universal nonrigid motion correction framework for first‐pass cardiac MR perfusion imaging , 2017, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[26]  D. Pennell,et al.  Cardiac Diffusion: Technique and Practical Applications , 2019, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[27]  Alistair A. Young,et al.  An Open Benchmark Challenge for Motion Correction of Myocardial Perfusion MRI , 2017, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[28]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. , 2002, Circulation.

[29]  Sonia Nielles-Vallespin,et al.  Myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimized dual sequence and reconstruction for quantification , 2017, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[30]  Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt,et al.  Fully Automated Motion Correction in First-Pass Myocardial Perfusion MR Image Sequences , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[31]  Christine H. Lorenz,et al.  Unsupervised Inline Analysis of Cardiac Perfusion MRI , 2009, MICCAI.

[32]  Richard B. Thompson,et al.  Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: A consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) , 2017, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[33]  Andrew S Flett,et al.  Comparison of T1 mapping techniques for ECV quantification. Histological validation and reproducibility of ShMOLLI versus multibreath-hold T1 quantification equilibrium contrast CMR , 2012, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[34]  Leon Axel,et al.  Recent Advances in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Techniques and Applications , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[35]  Peter Kellman,et al.  Motion corrected free‐breathing delayed‐enhancement imaging of myocardial infarction using nonrigid registration , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[36]  Amy C. Dwyer,et al.  Models and methods for analyzing DCE-MRI: a review. , 2014, Medical physics.

[37]  D Atkinson,et al.  Dual registration of abdominal motion for motility assessment in free-breathing data sets acquired using dynamic MRI , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[38]  P. Kellman,et al.  Extracellular volume imaging by magnetic resonance imaging provides insights into overt and sub-clinical myocardial pathology. , 2012, European heart journal.

[39]  P. Kellman,et al.  Quantitative myocardial perfusion analysis with a dual‐bolus contrast‐enhanced first‐pass MRI technique in humans , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[40]  Ganesh Adluru,et al.  Model‐based registration for dynamic cardiac perfusion MRI , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[41]  Qianjin Feng,et al.  Liver DCE-MRI Registration in Manifold Space Based on Robust Principal Component Analysis , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[42]  R. Kim,et al.  How we perform delayed enhancement imaging. , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[43]  R. Balaban,et al.  Absolute myocardial perfusion in canines measured by using dual-bolus first-pass MR imaging. , 2004, Radiology.