Spatial cognition in apes and humans

The debate on whether language influences cognition is sometimes seen as a simple dichotomy: cognitive development is governed either by innate predispositions or by influences of language and culture. In two recent papers on spatial cognition, Haun and colleagues break new ground in bringing together a comparative cognition approach with a cross-linguistic framework to arrive at a third position: that humans begin with the same spatial reference frames as our near relatives, the great apes, and diverge later owing to the influence of language and culture.

[1]  Tetsuro Matsuzawa,et al.  Cognitive development in object manipulation by infant chimpanzees , 2003, Animal Cognition.

[2]  H. Barbas,et al.  Serial pathways from primate prefrontal cortex to autonomic areas may influence emotional expression , 2003, BMC Neuroscience.

[3]  J. Price,et al.  The organization of networks within the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex of rats, monkeys and humans. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  L. Gleitman,et al.  Turning the tables: language and spatial reasoning , 2002, Cognition.

[5]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Visual Awareness in Human Extrastriate Cortex , 1998, Neuron.

[6]  C. Gallistel.  The organization of learning , 1990 .

[7]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Why Nouns Are Learned before Verbs: Linguistic Relativity Versus Natural Partitioning. Technical Report No. 257. , 1982 .

[8]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Affect is a form of cognition: A neurobiological analysis , 2007, Cognition & emotion.

[9]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Making Space: The Development of Spatial Representation and Reasoning , 2000 .

[10]  Tanaka,et al.  Cognitive development in object manipulation by infant chimpanzees , 2022 .

[11]  Stephen C. Levinson,et al.  Language acquisition and conceptual development: Relational concepts in form–function mapping , 2001 .

[12]  Michael D. Robinson,et al.  Episodic and semantic knowledge in emotional self-report: evidence for two judgment processes. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  J. Call,et al.  Evolutionary Psychology of Spatial Representations in the Hominidae , 2006, Current Biology.

[14]  G. Pourtois,et al.  Distributed and interactive brain mechanisms during emotion face perception: Evidence from functional neuroimaging , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  A. Anderson,et al.  Is the Human Amygdala Critical for the Subjective Experience of Emotion? Evidence of Intact Dispositional Affect in Patients with Amygdala Lesions , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  S. Levinson.  Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity , 2003 .

[17]  J. Call,et al.  Object permanence in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and children (Homo sapiens). , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[18]  L. Acredolo.  Development of Spatial Orientation in Infancy. , 1978 .

[19]  S. Levinson,et al.  Rethinking Linguistic Relativity , 1991, Current Anthropology.

[20]  Luiz Pessoa,et al.  Target visibility and visual awareness modulate amygdala responses to fearful faces. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  Christian J. Rapold,et al.  Cognitive cladistics and cultural override in Hominid spatial cognition , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  David P. Wilkins,et al.  Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization , 1998 .

[23]  S. Levinson,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.8 No.3 March 2004 Can language restructure cognition? The case for space , 2022 .

[24]  M. Shatz.  Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought (review) , 2006 .

[25]  Stephen C. Levinson,et al.  Rethinking Linguistic Relativity , 1991, Current Anthropology.

[26]  Fei Xu,et al.  Labeling Guides Object Individuation in 12-Month-Old Infants , 2005, Psychological science.

[27]  R. Dolan,et al.  Distant influences of amygdala lesion on visual cortical activation during emotional face processing , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.