Do Familiarity and Expectations Change Perception? Drivers' Glances and Response to Changes

The present study shows that repeated exposure to a road environment changes eye movement behaviour. In addition, repeated exposure may result in inadequate responses to unexpected changes in the road environment. Participants drove a low-cost simulator while their eye movements were recorded. With repeated exposure participants' glances at traffic signs along the route were shorter while having a better recollection of the traffic signs along the route. At the last drive, the priority situation at an intersection was changed (a priority road was changed into a yield situation). Even though drivers glanced at the sign that indicated the new priority situation, they did not sufficiently process the information to show an adequate response. Only two out of 12 drivers showed any response, being a response only after crossing the priority road markings. The current finding that unexpected but relevant information may be missed by drivers is relevant for other monitoring tasks.

[1]  I. Brown,et al.  Vision in Vehicles III , 1991 .

[2]  Lawrence S. Meyers,et al.  Visual Search of Common Scenes , 1978 .

[3]  G. Underwood,et al.  Eye movements and hazard perception in police pursuit and emergency response driving. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[4]  James Fisher,et al.  Testing the Effect of Road Traffic Signs′ Informational Value on Driver Behavior , 1992 .

[5]  Marieke Hendrikje Martens,et al.  Does road familiarity change eye fixations? A comparison between watching a video and real driving , 2007 .

[6]  K Rumar,et al.  Drivers and road signs: a preliminary investigation of the capacity of car drivers to get information from road signs. , 1966, Ergonomics.

[7]  K. Rayner,et al.  The psychology of reading , 1989 .

[8]  A. Friedman.  Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  K. Rayner,et al.  Effects of Foveal Priming and Extrafoveal Preview on Object Identification , 1987 .

[10]  P Van Elslande,et al.  WHEN EXPECTANCIES BECOME CERTAINTIES: A POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT OF EXPERIENCE , 1997 .

[11]  Marieke H. Martens,et al.  Stimuli Fixation and Manual Response as a Function of Expectancies , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[12]  M. A. Recarte,et al.  Effects of verbal and spatial-imagery tasks on eye fixations while driving. , 2000 .

[13]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual motion and attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  Staniša Milošević,et al.  Presentation factors and driver characteristics affecting road-sign registration , 1986 .

[15]  I D Brown,et al.  A REVIEW OF THE 'LOOKED BUT FAILED TO SEE' ACCIDENT CAUSATION FACTOR , 2002 .

[16]  G Underwood,et al.  Towards predicting driver intentions from patterns of eye fixations , 1999 .

[17]  Alex Chaparro,et al.  Effects of Experience and Task Relevance on the Ability to Detect Changes in a Real-World Task , 2003 .

[18]  J. W. Senders,et al.  HUMAN ERROR IN ROAD ACCIDENTS , 1999 .

[19]  Thomas H. Rockwell,et al.  TOWARD THE DEVELOPMENT OF A METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATING HIGHWAY SIGNS BASED ON DRIVER INFORMATION ACQUISITION , 1973 .

[20]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[21]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Visual search at intersections : An eye-movement analysis , 1996 .

[22]  N. Mackworth,et al.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Mai-Britt Herslund,et al.  Looked-but-failed-to-see-errors in traffic. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  D Shinar,et al.  Sign Registration in Daytime and Nighttime Driving , 1983, Human factors.

[25]  P. Chapman,et al.  Visual Search of Driving Situations: Danger and Experience , 1998, Perception.

[26]  P. de Graef,et al.  Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification , 1990, Psychological research.

[27]  G. Underwood,et al.  The Role of Eye Movements in Reading: Some Limitations of the Eye-Mind Assumption , 1992 .

[28]  David Crundall,et al.  Driving experience, attentional focusing, and the recall of recently inspected events , 2003 .

[29]  K Rumar,et al.  The basic driver error: late detection. , 1990, Ergonomics.

[30]  H. Summala,et al.  Drivers' immediate responses to traffic signs. , 1984, Ergonomics.

[31]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction , 1986 .

[32]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  A SYSTEMIC MODEL FOR DRIVER-IN-CONTROL , 2005 .

[33]  G Johansson,et al.  Drivers and road signs. , 1970, Ergonomics.

[34]  Geoffrey R. Loftus,et al.  Some facts about “weapon focus” , 1987 .

[35]  E. Hoffmann,et al.  Drivers' awareness of traffic sign information , 1991 .

[36]  J. Henderson,et al.  The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing , 1999 .

[37]  G Underwood.  Moray vs. the Rest: The Effects of Extended Shadowing Practice , 1974, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[38]  D. F. Fisher,et al.  Eye movements : cognition and visual perception , 1982 .

[39]  T. Rothengatter,et al.  Traffic and Transport Psychology: Theory and Application , 1997 .

[40]  Eugene Chekaluk,et al.  The Role of eye movements in perceptual processes , 1992 .

[41]  Walter Schneider.  PERCEPTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNS.. , 1994 .