Use Cases for Ontologies in Information Fusion

Abstract : Ontologies are becoming increasingly popular due to recent efforts to extend the capabilities of the World Wide Web through the addition of formal semantics. While ontologies have traditionally been used as precise languages to facilitate efficient exchange of information among people, the "Semantic Web" is extending this role to software agents. For this to be possible, ontologies must be formalized in languages processable by computers, such as OWL, the W3C's Web Ontology Language. The purpose of OWL ontologies is to permit software agents to understand web content and to interact intelligently with Web services (which may themselves be software agents). The use of such ontologies, however, need not be constrained to the Web. Recently, ontologies have found their way into higher-level information fusion where they are providing a means for describing and reasoning about sensor data, objects, relations and general domain theories. To the best of our knowledge, there is as of yet no documented effort to capture the main uses of ontologies in information fusion. In this paper, we start filling this void by presenting a number of "use cases," i.e., scenarios of the use of ontologies in the context of higher-level information fusion. In this paper, we develop use cases in which ontologies are used both for the fusion process itself and for the development of fusion systems. The use cases cover scenarios in which the agent roles are played by people, software or both.

[1]  Mieczyslaw M. Kokar,et al.  Using ontologies for recognition: an example , 2002, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Fusion. FUSION 2002. (IEEE Cat.No.02EX5997).

[2]  Kenneth Baclawski,et al.  A core ontology for situation awareness , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[3]  Mieczyslaw M. Kokar,et al.  An example of using ontologies and symbolic information in automatic target recognition , 2002 .

[4]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  OIL: An Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web , 2001, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[5]  Erik Blasch,et al.  Ontological issues in higher levels of information fusion: user refinement of the fusion process , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[6]  A.-C. Boury-Brisset,et al.  Ontology-based approach for information fusion , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[7]  Stephen Cranefield,et al.  UML for ontology development , 2002, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[8]  A. I. Chao,et al.  An extensible, ontology-based, distributed information system architecture , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[9]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web" in Scientific American , 2001 .

[10]  Katia Sycara,et al.  Information discovery and fusion: semantics on the battlefield , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[11]  Dan Brickley,et al.  Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification , 2002 .

[12]  Mieczyslaw M. Kokar,et al.  Derivation of ontological relations using formal methods in a situation awareness scenario , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[13]  Erland Jungert,et al.  An ontology controlled data fusion process for a query language , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[14]  Mike Uschold,et al.  A Framework for Understanding and Classifying Ontology Applications , 1999 .

[15]  Eugen Reichel,et al.  1. A - C , 1909 .