Non-Invasive Imaging of Acute Renal Allograft Rejection in Rats Using Small Animal 18F-FDG-PET

Background At present, renal grafts are the most common solid organ transplants world-wide. Given the importance of renal transplantation and the limitation of available donor kidneys, detailed analysis of factors that affect transplant survival are important. Despite the introduction of new and effective immunosuppressive drugs, acute cellular graft rejection (AR) is still a major risk for graft survival. Nowadays, AR can only be definitively by renal biopsy. However, biopsies carry a risk of renal transplant injury and loss. Most important, they can not be performed in patients taking anticoagulant drugs. Methodology/Principal Findings We present a non-invasive, entirely image-based method to assess AR in an allogeneic rat renal transplantation model using small animal positron emission tomography (PET) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). 3 h after i.v. injection of 30 MBq FDG into adult uni-nephrectomized, allogeneically transplanted rats, tissue radioactivity of renal parenchyma was assessed in vivo by a small animal PET-scanner (post operative day (POD) 1,2,4, and 7) and post mortem dissection. The mean radioactivity (cps/mm3 tissue) as well as the percent injected dose (%ID) was compared between graft and native reference kidney. Results were confirmed by histological and autoradiographic analysis. Healthy rats, rats with acute CSA nephrotoxicity, with acute tubular necrosis, and syngeneically transplanted rats served as controls. FDG-uptake was significantly elevated only in allogeneic grafts from POD 1 on when compared to the native kidney (%ID graft POD 1: 0.54±0.06; POD 2: 0.58±0.12; POD 4: 0.81±0.06; POD 7: 0.77±0.1; CTR: 0.22±0.01, n = 3–28). Renal FDG-uptake in vivo correlated with the results obtained by micro-autoradiography and the degree of inflammatory infiltrates observed in histology. Conclusions/Significance We propose that graft FDG-PET imaging is a new option to non-invasively, specifically, early detect, and follow-up acute renal rejection. This method is potentially useful to improve post-transplant rejection monitoring.

[1]  S. Hariharan,et al.  Improved graft survival after renal transplantation in the United States, 1988 to 1996. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  G. Gabriëls,et al.  Impact of renal transplantation on small vessel reactivity1 , 2003, Transplantation.

[3]  Andrew J Reader,et al.  Performance evaluation of the 32-module quadHIDAC small-animal PET scanner. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  M. Bakkaloğlu,et al.  Utility of the Doppler ultrasound parameter, resistive index, in renal transplant histopathology. , 2008, Transplantation proceedings.

[5]  W. Payne,et al.  THE IMPACT OF AN ACUTE REJECTION EPISODE ON LONG‐TERM RENAL ALLOGRAFT SURVIVAL (t1/2)1,2 , 1994, Transplantation.

[6]  H. Pavenstädt,et al.  Protective role of NHE-3 inhibition in rat renal transplantation undergoing acute rejection , 2008, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology.

[7]  S. Yildiz,et al.  Renal medullary changes in renal allograft recipients with raised serum creatinine , 2006, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[8]  R. Thomas,et al.  Renal transplantation modulates expression and function of receptors and transporters of rat proximal tubules. , 2004, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[9]  A. Velic,et al.  Acute Rejection After Rat Renal Transplantation Leads to Downregulation of Na+ and Water Channels in the Collecting Duct , 2005, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[10]  H. E. Hansen,et al.  The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. , 1999, Kidney international.

[11]  A. Taylor,et al.  Report of the Radionuclides in Nephrourology Committee for evaluation of transplanted kidney (review of techniques). , 1999, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[12]  T. Slowinski,et al.  Improved diagnosis of early kidney allograft dysfunction by ultrasound with echo enhancer--a new method for the diagnosis of renal perfusion. , 2006, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[13]  M. Sarwal,et al.  Molecular heterogeneity in acute renal allograft rejection identified by DNA microarray profiling. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  A. Nagler,et al.  INCREASED IMPACT OF ACUTE REJECTION ON CHRONIC ALLOGRAFT FAILURE IN RECENT ERA , 2000, Transplantation.

[15]  O. Schober,et al.  Dynamic 18F-fluoride small animal PET to noninvasively assess renal function in rats , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[16]  B. Kasiske,et al.  Chronic renal allograft rejection: immunologic and nonimmunologic risk factors. , 1996, Kidney international.

[17]  Paul J. van Diest,et al.  Biologic correlates of 18fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in human breast cancer measured by positron emission tomography , 2002 .

[18]  T. El-Diasty,et al.  Urological complications after living‐donor renal transplantation , 2001, BJU international.

[19]  A. Scheel,et al.  18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in fever of unknown origin. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  G. Navis,et al.  Bone marrow-derived myofibroblasts contribute to the renal interstitial myofibroblast population and produce procollagen I after ischemia/reperfusion in rats. , 2007, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[21]  D. Leehey,et al.  Improved graft survival after renal transplantation in the United States, 1988 to 1996. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  G. Einecked,et al.  Banff 07 Classification of Renal Allograft Pathology : Updates and Future Directions , 2008 .

[23]  A. Schwarz,et al.  Course and Relevance of Arteriovenous Fistulas After Renal Transplant Biopsies , 2008, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[24]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[25]  J. Chapman,et al.  Chronic renal allograft dysfunction. , 2005, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[26]  M. Kurrer,et al.  Autoradiographic quantification of 18F-FDG uptake in experimental soft-tissue abscesses in rats. , 2002, Radiology.

[27]  Chul-woo Yang,et al.  Differentiation between Acute Cyclosporine Nephrotoxicity and Acute Tubular Necrosis Using Enalaprilat Renal Scintigraphy in Rats , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[28]  T A Louis,et al.  Forecast of the number of patients with end-stage renal disease in the United States to the year 2010. , 2001, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[29]  C. Meltzer,et al.  PET/CT: form and function. , 2007, Radiology.

[30]  Gerhard Opelz,et al.  Influence of Time of Rejection on Long-Term Graft Survival in Renal Transplantation , 2008, Transplantation.

[31]  G. Remuzzi,et al.  Immunophenotypic analysis of cellular infiltrate of renal allograft biopsies in patients with acute rejection after induction with alemtuzumab (Campath-1H). , 2006, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[32]  A. Collins,et al.  Projecting the number of patients with end-stage renal disease in the United States to the year 2015. , 2005, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[33]  J. Heaf,et al.  Uses and limitations of renal scintigraphy in renal transplantation monitoring , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  D. Rush Protocol transplant biopsies: an underutilized tool in kidney transplantation. , 2005, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[35]  G. Mariani,et al.  Inflammation and infection: imaging properties of 18F-FDG-labeled white blood cells versus 18F-FDG. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[36]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  Biologic correlates of (18)fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in human breast cancer measured by positron emission tomography. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.