The prairie vole: an emerging model organism for understanding the social brain

Unlike most mammalian species, the prairie vole is highly affiliative, forms enduring social bonds between mates and displays biparental behavior. Over two decades of research on this species has enhanced our understanding of the neurobiological basis not only of monogamy, social attachment and nurturing behaviors but also other aspects of social cognition. Because social cognitive deficits are hallmarks of many psychiatric disorders, discoveries made in prairie voles can direct novel treatment strategies for disorders such as autism spectrum disorder and schizophrenia. With the ongoing development of molecular, genetic and genomic tools for this species, prairie voles will likely maintain their current trajectory becoming an unprecedented model organism for basic and translational research focusing on the biology of the social brain.

[1]  Joyce E. Hofmann,et al.  Social organization in free-living prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster , 1986, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[2]  R. Manchester,et al.  A radio pulsar with an 8.5-second period that challenges emission models , 1999, Nature.

[3]  W. Le,et al.  Intraspecific variation in estrogen receptor alpha and the expression of male sociosexual behavior in two populations of prairie voles , 2004, Brain Research.

[4]  K. Catania,et al.  Development of partner preferences in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster): The role of social and sexual experience , 1992, Hormones and Behavior.

[5]  Joyce E. Hofmann,et al.  Social Organization and Mating System of the Prairie Vole, Microtus Ochrogaster , 1990 .

[6]  Todd H. Ahern,et al.  The CRF System Mediates Increased Passive Stress-Coping Behavior Following the Loss of a Bonded Partner in a Monogamous Rodent , 2009, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[7]  Z. Wang,et al.  Vasopressin in the lateral septum regulates pair bond formation in male prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). , 2001, Behavioral neuroscience.

[8]  Evdokia Anagnostou,et al.  Oxytocin Increases Retention of Social Cognition in Autism , 2007, Biological Psychiatry.

[9]  Todd H. Ahern,et al.  Behavioral Neuroscience , 2022 .

[10]  S. Porges,et al.  Oxytocin protects against negative behavioral and autonomic consequences of long-term social isolation , 2009, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[11]  C. Ferris,et al.  Patterns of brain vasopressin receptor distribution associated with social organization in microtine rodents , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  Paul Allen Miller,et al.  ‘What's Love got to do with it?’ , 2010 .

[13]  C.,et al.  Physiological Substrates of Mammalian Monogamy : The Prairie Vole Model , 2002 .

[14]  B. Cushing,et al.  Microtines: a Model System for Studying the Evolution and Regulation of Social Monogamy , 2005 .

[15]  B. Leventhal,et al.  Transmission disequilibrium testing of arginine vasopressin receptor 1A (AVPR1A) polymorphisms in autism , 2002, Molecular Psychiatry.

[16]  Zuoxin Wang,et al.  The neurobiology of social attachment: A comparative approach to behavioral, neuroanatomical, and neurochemical studies. , 2008, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP.

[17]  L. Excoffier,et al.  Mammalian monogamy is not controlled by a single gene. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  L. Getz,et al.  Female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) fail to form a new pair after loss of mate , 1998, Behavioural Processes.

[19]  T. O. Crist,et al.  Estimates of reproductive success for group-living prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster, in high-density populations , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  S. Porges,et al.  Social Isolation Disrupts Autonomic Regulation of the Heart and Influences Negative Affective Behaviors , 2007, Biological Psychiatry.

[21]  Joyce E. Hofmann,et al.  Social Organization of the Prairie Vole (Microtus ochrogaster) , 1993 .

[22]  L. Young,et al.  The neurobiology of pair bonding , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Zoe R. Donaldson,et al.  Oxytocin, Vasopressin, and the Neurogenetics of Sociality , 2008, Science.

[24]  T. Insel,et al.  Oxytocin Receptor Distribution Reflects Social Organization in Monogamous and Polygamous Voles , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Joyce E. Hofmann,et al.  Home Range Overlap and Nest Cohabitation of Male and Female Prairie Voles , 1984 .

[26]  T. Insel,et al.  Nucleus accumbens dopamine differentially mediates the formation and maintenance of monogamous pair bonds , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  R. Tamarin Social Systems and Population Cycles in Voles , 1990, Advances in Life Sciences.

[28]  V J Vieland,et al.  Examination of AVPR1a as an autism susceptibility gene , 2004, Molecular Psychiatry.

[29]  C. Carter,et al.  Physiological substrates of mammalian monogamy: The prairie vole model , 1995, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[30]  C. Carter,et al.  The effects of oxytocin and vasopressin on partner preferences in male and female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). , 1999, Behavioral neuroscience.

[31]  L. Young Oxytocin and Vasopressin Receptors and Species-Typical Social Behaviors , 1999, Hormones and Behavior.

[32]  R. Ebstein,et al.  Association between the arginine vasopressin 1a receptor (AVPR1a) gene and autism in a family-based study: mediation by socialization skills , 2006, Molecular Psychiatry.

[33]  Zoe R. Donaldson,et al.  Production of Germline Transgenic Prairie Voles (Microtus ochrogaster) Using Lentiviral Vectors1 , 2009, Biology of reproduction.

[34]  T. Insel,et al.  Increased affiliative response to vasopressin in mice expressing the V1a receptor from a monogamous vole , 1999, Nature.

[35]  Thomas R. Insel,et al.  A role for central vasopressin in pair bonding in monogamous prairie voles , 1993, Nature.

[36]  P. Sherman,et al.  Rodent Societies: An Ecological and Evolutionary Perspective , 2007 .

[37]  Larry J. Young,et al.  Enhanced partner preference in a promiscuous species by manipulating the expression of a single gene , 2004, Nature.

[38]  S. Phelps,et al.  Field tests of cis-regulatory variation at the prairie vole avpr1a locus: Association with V1aR abundance but not sexual or social fidelity , 2008, Hormones and Behavior.

[39]  L. Young,et al.  On switches and knobs, microsatellites and monogamy. , 2007, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[40]  Larry J Young,et al.  Anatomy and neurochemistry of the pair bond , 2005, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[41]  C. Carter,et al.  Role of social and endocrine factors in alloparental behavior of prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) , 1998 .

[42]  C. Carter,et al.  The mating system of the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster: Field and laboratory evidence for pair-bonding , 1981, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[43]  M. Novak,et al.  Sex and Species Differences in the Vasopressin Innervation of Sexually Naive and Parental Prairie Voles, Microtus ochrogaster and Meadow Voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus , 1993, Journal of neuroendocrinology.

[44]  Nancy L Pedersen,et al.  Genetic variation in the vasopressin receptor 1a gene (AVPR1A) associates with pair-bonding behavior in humans , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  T. Insel,et al.  Cellular Mechanisms of Social Attachment , 2001, Hormones and Behavior.

[46]  Larry J Young,et al.  Microsatellite Instability Generates Diversity in Brain and Sociobehavioral Traits , 2005, Science.

[47]  B. Aragona,et al.  A Critical Role for Nucleus Accumbens Dopamine in Partner-Preference Formation in Male Prairie Voles , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  L. Young,et al.  The Effects of Peptides on Partner Preference Formation Are Predicted by Habitat in Prairie Voles , 2001, Hormones and Behavior.

[49]  L. Young,et al.  Oxytocin receptors in the nucleus accumbens facilitate “spontaneous” maternal behavior in adult female prairie voles , 2006, Neuroscience.

[50]  Todd H. Ahern,et al.  Evaluation of two automated metrics for analyzing partner preference tests , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[51]  L. Young,et al.  Species and individual differences in juvenile female alloparental care are associated with oxytocin receptor density in the striatum and the lateral septum , 2006, Hormones and Behavior.

[52]  L. Young,et al.  Vasopressin-dependent neural circuits underlying pair bond formation in the monogamous prairie vole , 2004, Neuroscience.

[53]  L. Young,et al.  Variation in Oxytocin Receptor Density in the Nucleus Accumbens Has Differential Effects on Affiliative Behaviors in Monogamous and Polygamous Voles , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  T R Insel,et al.  A gender-specific mechanism for pair bonding: oxytocin and partner preference formation in monogamous voles. , 1995, Behavioral neuroscience.

[55]  Zuoxin Wang,et al.  Nucleus accumbens oxytocin and dopamine interact to regulate pair bond formation in female prairie voles , 2003, Neuroscience.

[56]  E. Birney,et al.  Parental care and mating system of the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster , 1979, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[57]  C. Ferris,et al.  Role of septal vasopressin innervation in paternal behavior in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  Markus Heinrichs,et al.  Oxytocin, vasopressin, and human social behavior , 2009, Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology.

[59]  T. Insel,et al.  Immunoreactivity of central vasopressin and oxytocin pathways in microtine rodents: A quantitative comparative study , 1996, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[60]  Larry J. Young,et al.  Oxytocin and the neural mechanisms regulating social cognition and affiliative behavior , 2009, Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology.

[61]  T. Insel,et al.  Oxytocin Administered Centrally Facilitates Formation of a Partner Preference in Female Prairie Voles (Microtus ochrogaster) , 1994, Journal of neuroendocrinology.

[62]  S. Phelps,et al.  Social but not genetic monogamy is associated with greater breeding success in prairie voles , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[63]  C. Carter,et al.  Depression-Like Behavior and Stressor-Induced Neuroendocrine Activation in Female Prairie Voles Exposed to Chronic Social Isolation , 2007, Psychosomatic medicine.

[64]  Amphetamine reward in the monogamous prairie vole , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[65]  C. Nemeroff,et al.  Lower CSF oxytocin concentrations in women with a history of childhood abuse , 2009, Molecular Psychiatry.

[66]  T. Insel,et al.  Oxytocin receptor distribution reflects social organization in monogamous and polygamous voles. , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[67]  E. Tribollet,et al.  Distribution of vasopressin and oxytocin binding sites in the brain and upper spinal cord of the common marmoset , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[68]  M. Novak,et al.  Cohabitation alters vasopressin innervation and paternal behavior in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) , 1994, Physiology & Behavior.