The frame problem, the relevance problem, and a package solution to both
暂无分享,去创建一个
Pei Wang | Yingjin Xu | Pei Wang | Yingjin Xu
[1] Greg Restall,et al. Information Flow and Relevant Logics , 1996 .
[2] W. Quine. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays , 1969 .
[3] John McCarthy,et al. SOME PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS FROM THE STANDPOINT OF ARTI CIAL INTELLIGENCE , 1987 .
[4] E. Mares. Relevant Logic: A Philosophical Interpretation , 2004 .
[5] R. Audi. Dispositional beliefs and dispositions to believe , 1994 .
[6] Branden Fitelson. The Paradox of Confirmation1 , 2006 .
[7] Robert A. Wilson,et al. Book Reviews: The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences , 2000, CL.
[8] S. Laurence,et al. Concepts: Core Readings , 1999 .
[9] Carl G. Hempel,et al. I.—STUDIES IN THE LOGIC OF CONFIRMATION (II.) , 1945 .
[10] J. Fodor. The Mind Doesn't Work That Way : The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology , 2000 .
[11] Pei Wang,et al. Formalization of Evidence: A Comparative Study , 2009, J. Artif. Gen. Intell..
[12] Bernhard Nebel,et al. An Empirical Analysis of Terminological Representation Systems , 1992, Artif. Intell..
[13] Judea Pearl,et al. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.
[14] Marvin Minsky,et al. A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .
[15] M. Shanahan. Solving the frame problem , 1997 .
[16] P. Spirtes,et al. Causation, prediction, and search , 1993 .
[17] Keith Devlin,et al. Logic and information , 1991 .
[18] Pei Wang,et al. Three fundamental misconceptions of Artificial Intelligence , 2007, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..
[19] John Haugeland. The nature and plausibility of Cognitivism , 1978, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[20] W. Quine. Main trends in recent philosophy: two dogmas of empiricism. , 1951 .
[21] P. Kleingeld,et al. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 2013 .
[22] Aziz F. Zambak. The Frame Problem - Autonomy Approach versus Designer Approach , 2011, PT-AI.
[23] Pei Wang. From Inheritance Relation to Non-Axiomatic Logic , 1994 .
[24] M R Quillian,et al. Word concepts: a theory and simulation of some basic semantic capabilities. , 1967, Behavioral science.
[25] David S. Touretzky,et al. The Mathematics of Inheritance Systems , 1984 .
[26] Pei Wang,et al. The limitation of Bayesianism , 2004, Artif. Intell..
[27] Y. Shoham. What is the frame problem , 1987 .
[28] M. Young. Relevance and Relationalism , 2011 .
[29] Pei Wang. Confidence as Higher-Order Uncertainty , 2001, ISIPTA.
[30] Manfred Jaeger,et al. Probabilistic Reasoning in Terminological Logics , 1994, KR.
[31] W. Quine. The two dogmas of empiricism , 1951 .
[32] M. de Rijke,et al. Logic, language and computation, vol. 2 , 1999 .
[33] Daniel C. Dennett,et al. Cognitive Wheels: The Frame Problem of AI , 1990, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.
[34] J. Fodor. The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .
[35] Pei Wang. From inheritance relation to nonaxiomatic logic , 1994, Int. J. Approx. Reason..
[36] M. Black. Review: Karl Menger, Tri-Operational Algebra; Ferdinand L. Brown, Remarks Concerning Tri-Operational Algebra; Carl G. Hempel, Studies in the Logic of Confirmation , 1945 .
[37] John E. Hershey,et al. Computation , 1991, Digit. Signal Process..
[38] Tony Lawson,et al. The Context of Prediction (and the Paradox of Confirmation) , 1985, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[39] Edwin D. Mares,et al. Relevant logic and the theory of information , 1996, Synthese.
[40] J. Michael Dunn,et al. Relevance Logic and Entailment , 1986 .
[41] Pei Wang. Analogy in a general-purpose reasoning system , 2009, Cognitive Systems Research.
[42] Drew McDermott,et al. Nonmonotonic Logic and Temporal Projection , 1987, Artif. Intell..
[43] J. Mackie. The Relevance Criterion of Confirmation , 1969, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[44] Umberto Straccia,et al. Reasoning within Fuzzy Description Logics , 2011, J. Artif. Intell. Res..
[45] Diego Calvanese,et al. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications , 2003, Description Logic Handbook.
[46] Hubert L. Dreyfus,et al. How to stop worrying about the frame problem even though it's computationally insoluble , 1987 .
[47] Pei Wang,et al. Rigid Flexibility: The Logic of Intelligence , 2006 .
[48] Ruth Weintraub. A paradox of confirmation , 1988 .
[49] P. Spirtes,et al. Causation, Prediction, and Search, 2nd Edition , 2001 .
[50] Ralf Küsters. Non-Standard Inferences in Description Logics , 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
[51] J. Pearl. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .
[52] Alexander Bird,et al. Natural Kinds , 1988, Philosophy.
[53] John Yen,et al. Generalizing Term Subsumption Languages to Fuzzy Logic , 1991, IJCAI.
[54] Pei Wang,et al. Heuristics and normative models of judgment under uncertainty , 1996, Int. J. Approx. Reason..
[55] Pei Wang,et al. The Generation and Evaluation of Generic Sentences , 2004 .
[56] Ronald J. Brachman,et al. What's in a Concept: Structural Foundations for Semantic Networks , 1977, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..
[57] Dov M. Gabbay,et al. Handbook of Philosophical Logic , 2002 .
[58] M. de Rijke,et al. Logic, Language and Computation , 1997 .
[59] Arnon Avron,et al. What is relevance logic? , 2014, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..
[60] Eric Lormand. Framing the frame problem , 2004, Synthese.
[61] Raymond Reiter,et al. On Interacting Defaults , 1981, IJCAI.