Caution And Consensus In American Business Meetings

This article contributes to studies of politeness and talk in the workplace. In particular, it focuses on the ways in which cautiousness is exercised to achieve consensus in American business meetings. This topic is elaborated against the real-world background of the surveillance culture of corporate America and a tradition of consensus-oriented decision-making, in the theoretical context of politeness theory (adding variables related to the ‘political economy’ of the investigated interactions), and with the methodological insights provided by conversation analysis. ‘Reversals’ are identified as specific turn patterns in face-saving strategies aimed at consensus. Two processes are highlighted: Attempts at protecting oneself through a reversal of opinion, and protecting others by helping them articulate a reversal.

[1]  M. Coulthard,et al.  Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis , 1995 .

[2]  Allen C. Bluedorn,et al.  Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[3]  E. Schegloff,et al.  The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation , 1977 .

[4]  D. Maynard,et al.  Inside Plea Bargaining: The Language of Negotiation , 1984 .

[5]  S. Okamoto.  SITUATED POLITENESS: MANIPULATING HONORIFIC AND NON-HONORIFIC EXPRESSIONS IN JAPANESE CONVERSATIONS , 1999 .

[6]  Johannes Wagner,et al.  The discourse of business negotiation , 1995 .

[7]  G. Button,et al.  Talk and Social Organisation , 1988 .

[8]  D. Boden.  The Business of Talk: Organizations in Action , 1995 .

[9]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  Assessments and the Construction of Context , 1992 .

[10]  T. Tahashi.  [Cultural anthropology. 5]. , 1969, [Kango kyoiku] Japanese journal of nurses' education.

[11]  H. Shepard,et al.  Men Who Manage , 1959 .

[12]  H. Schwartzman.  The Meeting: Gatherings in Organizations and Communities , 1989 .

[13]  JANE H. Hill,et al.  Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse , 1994 .

[14]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[15]  Helena Kangasharju.  Aligning as a team in multiparty conversation , 1996 .

[16]  J. M. Atkinson.  Structures of Social Action: Contents , 1985 .

[17]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon , 1992 .

[18]  M. Goodwin.  He-Said-She-Said: Talk As Social Organization Among Black Children , 1993 .

[19]  P. ten Have,et al.  Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied action. , 1995 .

[20]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[21]  Graham Button,et al.  Published in: Technology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction, and Technology, , 2022 .

[22]  J. Porac,et al.  Cognition and Communication at Work , 1999 .

[23]  M. Foucault,et al.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. , 1978 .

[24]  A. Firth.  The discourse of negotiation : studies of language in the workplace , 1995 .

[25]  P. Adler,et al.  Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation , 1993 .

[26]  Michael Silverstein,et al.  CONTEMPORARY TRANSFORMATIONS OF LOCAL LINGUISTIC COMMUNITIES , 1998 .

[27]  E. Schegloff,et al.  Notes on Laughter in the Pursuit of Intimacy , 1987 .

[28]  Gene H. Lerner.  Collectivities in action: Establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in conversation , 1993 .

[29]  M. Foucault,et al.  Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 , 1980 .

[30]  C. Briggs.  Introduction: From The Ideal, The Ordinary, And The Orderly To Conflict And Violence In Pragmatic Research , 1997 .

[31]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[32]  R. Watts.  Language And Politeness In Early Eighteenth Century Britain , 1999 .

[33]  P. Bourdieu.  The Scholastic Point of View , 1990 .

[34]  C. Goodwin.  Between and within: Alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments , 1986 .

[35]  Paul Drew,et al.  Analyzing talk at work: an introduction , 1992 .

[36]  Gino Eelen.  Politeness And Ideology: A Critical Review , 1999 .

[37]  Judy Davidson.  Structures of Social Action: Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection , 1985 .

[38]  Deborah Schiffrin,et al.  Jewish argument as sociability , 1984, Language in Society.

[39]  Alexandra Ouroussoff.  Illusions of rationality: false premisses of the liberal tradition , 1993 .

[40]  S. Gal,et al.  Constructing languages and publics: Authoriy and representation , 1995 .

[41]  M. Goodwin.  processes of dispute management among urban black children , 1982 .

[42]  L. Mao.  Beyond politeness theory: ‘Face’ revisited and renewed , 1994 .

[43]  N. Fairclough,et al.  Language and Power , 2009 .

[44]  D. Riesman,et al.  The Lonely Crowd , 2017 .

[45]  J. Rosenbaum,et al.  Career Mobility in a Corporate Hierarchy. , 1986 .

[46]  P. Drew,et al.  Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. , 1994 .

[47]  Srikant Sarangi,et al.  The dynamics of interactional and institutional orders in work-related settings , 1999 .

[48]  Robert Jackall,et al.  Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers , 1988 .

[49]  Anita M. Pomerantz.  Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes , 1984 .

[50]  S. Gal.  Language and political economy , 2016, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory.

[51]  Bambi B. Schieffelin,et al.  Language ideologies : practice and theory , 1999 .

[52]  Ruth Wodak,et al.  Language, power and ideology : studies in political discourse , 1989 .

[53]  Marjorie Harness Goodwin,et al.  Aggravated correction and disagreement in children's conversations , 1983 .

[54]  W. Whyte.  The Organization Man , 1957, American Social Character.

[55]  S. Sarangi,et al.  Talk, work, and institutional order : discourse in medical, mediation, and management settings , 1999 .