OpenTD: Open Traffic Differentiation in a Post-Neutral World

In the absence of network neutrality, consumers are vulnerable to arbitrary traffic discrimination policies applied by Internet Service Providers (ISPs). In this paper we propose a framework that gives ISPs flexibility to practice differentiation, while being open so consumers can make informed choices, and accountable so regulators can oversee adherence. We begin by outlining the SDN-based architecture of our solution, comprising the segregation of traffic into a chosen number of classes, and dynamic partitioning of bandwidth amongst classes based on utility functions. We then highlight the flexibility of our framework in accommodating a wide range of behaviors, from fully-neutral to per-application-type and per-subscriber-tier differentiation. We evaluate our scheme via simulations of real traffic mixes to show how ISP differentiation policies can be tuned to meet a range of user needs, and implement our scheme in a testbed network to demonstrate practical feasibility. We believe our proposal is a promising approach to keeping ISPs, consumers, and regulators happy in a post-neutral world.

[1]  Alissa Cooper,et al.  Net Neutrality , 2015, ACM Trans. Internet Techn..

[2]  Gen Liang,et al.  Network selection algorithm for heterogeneous wireless networks based on service characteristics and user preferences , 2018, EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking.

[3]  Scott Shenker,et al.  Integrated Services in the Internet Architecture : an Overview Status of this Memo , 1994 .

[4]  Bin Wang,et al.  Utility-based resource allocation for mixed traffic in wireless networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS).

[5]  G. DeFriese,et al.  The New York Times , 2020, Publishing for Libraries.

[6]  Nick Feamster,et al.  FlowQoS: QoS for the rest of us , 2014, HotSDN.

[7]  David L. Black,et al.  An Architecture for Differentiated Service , 1998 .

[8]  Angela Daly Net Neutrality in Australia: An Emerging Debate , 2014 .

[9]  Daniel P. Siewiorek,et al.  A resource allocation model for QoS management , 1997, Proceedings Real-Time Systems Symposium.

[10]  Vijay Sivaraman,et al.  Enabling Fast and Slow Lanes for Content Providers Using Software Defined Networking , 2017, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[11]  Elias P. Duarte,et al.  Monitoring Network Neutrality: A Survey on Traffic Differentiation Detection , 2018, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[12]  Vijay Sivaraman,et al.  Perspectives on Net Neutrality and Internet Fast-Lanes , 2016, CCRV.

[13]  Klaus Nieminen Net Neutrality Measurements: Regulatory Use Case and Problem Statement , 2017 .

[14]  Joacim Tåg,et al.  Network Neutrality on the Internet: A Two-Sided Market Analysis , 2011, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[15]  Vishal Misra,et al.  The Public Option: A Nonregulatory Alternative to Network Neutrality , 2011, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[16]  Lusheng Wang,et al.  Mathematical Modeling for Network Selection in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks — A Tutorial , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[17]  Chen Liang,et al.  Participatory networking: an API for application control of SDNs , 2013, SIGCOMM.

[18]  Eitan Altman,et al.  Network Non-neutrality Debate: An Economic Analysis , 2010, Networking.

[19]  Halim Yanikomeroglu,et al.  Utility-based adaptive radio resource allocation in OFDM wireless networks with traffic prioritization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.