Three-dimensional facial morphometry of attractive adolescent boys and girls.

OBJECTIVES To identify reference standards and possible esthetic features of facial size and form of Italian adolescent boys and girls. METHODS AND SUBJECTS A three-dimensional electromagnetic digitizer was used to collect the coordinates of 50 facial landmarks (forehead, eyes, nose, cheeks, mouth, jaw, ears) in 231 healthy, reference adolescents (10-17 years old) and in 93 "attractive" adolescents selected by a commercial casting; soft tissue facial angles, distances and volumes were computed. RESULTS Attractive adolescents had wider and shorter faces than reference subjects of the same age and sex, with relatively larger upper and middle facial thirds, and a reduced mandible relative to the maxilla. Lips were larger and more prominent, and the nasolabial angle was reduced, but in older boys the effect was reversed. The prominence of the soft-tissue profile, and of the maxilla relative to the mandible, were larger in attractive boys, but smaller in attractive girls than in their reference peers. Attractive adolescents had a relatively less prominent chin relative to the lower lip, with increased values of the mentolabial angle. In the horizontal plane, attractive "young" adolescents had a more obtuse mandibular convexity angle, while the opposite pattern was observed in the "old" adolescent subjects, with a relatively more prominent chin. Attractive adolescents had smaller noses than reference subjects of the same age and sex. CONCLUSION Esthetic reference values have been identified which could be used to determine optimal timing and goals in orthodontic treatment.

[1]  The relationship between facial 3-D morphometry and the perception of attractiveness in children. , 1997, The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.

[2]  J. Sandy,et al.  An aesthetic index for evaluation of cleft repair. , 2003, European journal of orthodontics.

[3]  Ashok Samal,et al.  How effective are landmarks and their geometry for face recognition? , 2006, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[4]  Dall Jl,et al.  THE FIRST FIFTY YEARS. , 1963 .

[5]  Greg J. Huang,et al.  Methods to evaluate profile preferences for the anteroposterior position of the mandible. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[6]  V F Ferrario,et al.  Facial morphometry of television actresses compared with normal women. , 1995, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[7]  D. Wertheim,et al.  The use of anthropometric proportion indices in the measurement of facial attractiveness. , 2005, European journal of orthodontics.

[8]  J. Mew Suggestions for forecasting and monitoring facial growth. , 1993, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[9]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Second to fourth digit ratio and face shape , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Chiarella Sforza,et al.  Three-dimensional facial morphometry of attractive children and normal children in the deciduous and early mixed dentition. , 2007, The Angle orthodontist.

[11]  Robert M. Ricketts,et al.  Perspectives in the Clinical Application of Cephalometrics , 2009 .

[12]  R. Bergman,et al.  Cephalometric soft tissue facial analysis. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[13]  Matthew Stone,et al.  An anthropometric face model using variational techniques , 1998, SIGGRAPH.

[14]  C. Scott,et al.  Influence of lips on the perception of malocclusion. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  R M Ricketts,et al.  Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. The first fifty years. , 1981, The Angle orthodontist.

[16]  Chiarella Sforza,et al.  Growth and aging of facial soft tissues: A computerized three‐dimensional mesh diagram analysis , 2003, Clinical anatomy.

[17]  V. Ferrario,et al.  Soft tissue facial volumes and shape in skeletal Class III patients before and after orthognathic surgery treatment. , 2007, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[18]  Turley Pk,et al.  The female soft tissue profile as presented in fashion magazines during the 1900s: a photographic analysis. , 1999 .

[19]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Visualizing facial shape regression upon 2nd to 4th digit ratio and testosterone. , 2005, Collegium antropologicum.

[20]  M. Bashour,et al.  History and Current Concepts in the Analysis of Facial Attractiveness , 2006, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[21]  P. Turley,et al.  The female soft tissue profile as presented in fashion magazines during the 1900s: a photographic analysis. , 1999, The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.

[22]  Seung Chul Rhee,et al.  An objective system for measuring facial attractiveness. , 2007, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[23]  B. Fink,et al.  Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women , 2007, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[24]  Farhad B Naini,et al.  The enigma of facial beauty: esthetics, proportions, deformity, and controversy. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[25]  P. O'higgins,et al.  A geometric morphometric study of regional differences in the ontogeny of the modern human facial skeleton † , 2002, Journal of anatomy.

[26]  W. Shaw The influence of children's dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. , 1981, American journal of orthodontics.

[27]  Stephen Todd,et al.  Perceptions of facial aesthetics in two and three dimensions. , 2005, European journal of orthodontics.

[28]  V. Ferrario,et al.  Preliminary Evaluation of an Electromagnetic Three-Dimensional Digitizer in Facial Anthropometry , 1998, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[29]  S Peck,et al.  Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[30]  Hans Pancherz,et al.  Skeletofacial morphology of attractive and nonattractive faces. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[31]  H. Metelmann,et al.  The influence of the muscles of facial expression on the development of the midface and the nose in cleft lip and palate patients. A reflection of functional anatomy, facial esthetics and physiology of the nose. , 1999, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[32]  A. Grobbelaar,et al.  The esthetic properties of lips: a comparison of models and nonmodels. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[33]  A. Kuijpers-Jagtman,et al.  Influence of panel composition on aesthetic evaluation of adolescent faces. , 2007, European journal of orthodontics.

[34]  J. Waddington,et al.  Facial surface analysis by 3D laser scanning and geometric morphometrics in relation to sexual dimorphism in cerebral–craniofacial morphogenesis and cognitive function , 2005, Journal of anatomy.

[35]  L. Peck,et al.  Selected aspects of the art and science of facial esthetics. , 1995, Seminars in orthodontics.

[36]  S. Akyalcin,et al.  Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[37]  H. Kiyak,et al.  Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[38]  Chiarella Sforza,et al.  Three-dimensional facial morphometry in skeletal Class III patients. A non-invasive study of soft-tissue changes before and after orthognathic surgery. , 2007, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.