Estimation of single stress fiber stiffness in cultured aortic smooth muscle cells under relaxed and contracted states: Its relation to dynamic rearrangement of stress fibers.

For a quantitative analysis of intracellular mechanotransduction, it is crucial to know the mechanical properties of actin stress fibers in situ. Here we measured tensile properties of cultured aortic smooth muscle cells (SMCs) in a quasi-in situ tensile test in relaxed and activated states to estimate stiffness of their single stress fibers (SFs). An SMC cultured on substrates was held using a pair of micropipettes and detached from the substrate while maintaining its in situ cell shape and cytoskeletal integrity. Stretching up to approximately 15% followed by unloading was repeated three times to stabilize their tension-strain curves in the untreated (relaxed) and 10 microM-serotonin-treated (activated) condition. Cell stiffness defined as the average slope of the loading limb of the stable loops was approximately 25 and approximately 40 nN/% in relaxed and activated states, respectively. It decreased to approximately 10 nN/% following SF disruption with cytochalasin D in both states. The number of SFs in each cell measured with confocal microscopy decreased significantly upon serotonin activation from 21.5+/-3.8 (mean+/-SD, n=80) to 17.5+/-3.9 (n=77). The dynamics of focal adhesions (FAs) were observed in adherent cells using surface reflective interference contrast microscopy. FAs aligned and elongated along the cell major axis following activation and then merged with each other, suggesting that the decrease in SFs was caused by their fusion. Average stiffness of single SFs estimated by the average decrease in whole-cell stiffness following SF disruption divided by the average number of SFs in each cell was approximately 0.7 and approximately 1.6 nN/% in the relaxed and activated states, respectively. Stiffening of single SFs following SF activation was remarkably higher than stiffening at the whole-cell level. Results indicate that SFs stiffen not only due to activation of the actomyosin interaction, but also due to their fusion, a finding which would not be obtained from analysis of isolated SFs.

[1]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[2]  J J Fredberg,et al.  Mechanical properties of cultured human airway smooth muscle cells from 0.05 to 0.4 Hz. , 2000, Journal of applied physiology.

[3]  Takeo Matsumoto,et al.  Effect of actin filament distribution on tensile properties of smooth muscle cells obtained from rat thoracic aortas. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  D. Warshaw,et al.  Pharmacology and Force Development of Single Freshly Isolated Bovine Carotid Artery Smooth Muscle Cells , 1986, Circulation research.

[5]  Kazuaki Nagayama,et al.  A novel micro tensile tester with feed-back control for viscoelastic analysis of single isolated smooth muscle cells. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[6]  Richard O. Hynes,et al.  Integrins: Versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion , 1992, Cell.

[7]  D E Ingber,et al.  Fibronectin controls capillary endothelial cell growth by modulating cell shape. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Linhong Deng,et al.  Localized mechanical stress induces time-dependent actin cytoskeletal remodeling and stiffening in cultured airway smooth muscle cells. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[9]  Jean-Jacques Meister,et al.  Focal adhesion size controls tension-dependent recruitment of α-smooth muscle actin to stress fibers , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  V. Mow,et al.  The mechanical environment of the chondrocyte: a biphasic finite element model of cell-matrix interactions in articular cartilage. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Rat airway smooth muscle cell during actin modulation: rheology and glassy dynamics. , 2005, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[12]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors Externally Applied Local Mechanical Force Induces Growth of Focal Contacts by an Mdia1-Dependent and Rock-Independent Mechanism , 2001 .

[13]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton , 1993 .

[14]  N Wang,et al.  Mechanical interactions among cytoskeletal filaments. , 1998, Hypertension.

[15]  J. Hartwig,et al.  Mechanical Remodeling of the Endothelial Surface and Actin Cytoskeleton Induced by Fluid Flow , 1997, Microcirculation.

[16]  D. Stamenović,et al.  Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[17]  William E Kraus,et al.  Apparent elastic modulus and hysteresis of skeletal muscle cells throughout differentiation. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[18]  Shinji Deguchi,et al.  Tensile properties of single stress fibers isolated from cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  P. Davies,et al.  Quantitative studies of endothelial cell adhesion. Directional remodeling of focal adhesion sites in response to flow forces. , 1994, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[20]  Kazuaki Nagayama,et al.  Contribution of actin filaments and microtubules to quasi-in situ tensile properties and internal force balance of cultured smooth muscle cells on a substrate. , 2008, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[21]  S. Gunst,et al.  Dynamic association between α‐actinin and β‐integrin regulates contraction of canine tracheal smooth muscle , 2006 .

[22]  F. Brozovich,et al.  Mechanical strain increases velocity and extent of shortening in cultured airway smooth muscle cells. , 1999, American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology.

[23]  Tensile Properties of Cultured Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells Obtained in a quasi-in situ Tensile Test with Thermoresponsive Gelatin , 2006 .

[24]  P. Davies,et al.  Flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction. , 1995, Physiological reviews.