From Social Theory to Policy Design

Little attention has been given in policy analysis to the creative process of designing solutions to public policy problems. There are a number of difficulties in applying macro-level theories – whether from economics, sociology, philosophy or macro-systems theory – in the policy process. Any macro-level theory will tend to provide inadequate guidance in one or more of three aspects of policy-making: a model of causation, a model for evaluating alternatives and outcomes, and a model of how interventions operate. Our current knowledge about which policy strategies work best under which conditions is at best rudimentary. Academic disciplinary perspectives focus on a narrow repertoire of policy instruments. What is required is a design focus which draws on instruments associated with a range of disciplines and professions. A design perspective involves both a systematic process for generating basic strategies and a framework for comparing them. Such an approach will require at least the following elements: (1) the characteristics of problems (scale, collectiveness, certainty, predictability, independence); (2) characteristics of goals (value-laden, operational, process of goal-setting); (3) characteristics of instruments (suitability of different instruments).

[1]  Henry J. Aaron,et al.  Politics and the Professors: The Great Society in Perspective , 1978 .

[2]  John S. Dryzek,et al.  Don't Toss Coins in Garbage Cans: A Prologue to Policy Design , 1983, Journal of Public Policy.

[3]  H. Simon,et al.  On How to Decide What to Do , 1978 .

[4]  C. Hood.  The Tools of Government , 1983 .

[5]  Alexander M. Mood,et al.  Introduction to Policy Analysis , 1982 .

[6]  E. S. Quade,et al.  Analysis for public decisions , 1975 .

[7]  Duncan MacRae,et al.  Policy Analysis for Public Decisions , 1985 .

[8]  A. King,et al.  The New American Political System. , 1980 .

[9]  F. C. Mosher.  The Changing Responsibilities and Tactics of the Federal Government , 1980 .

[10]  H. Wolman,et al.  The Determinants of Program Success and Failure , 1981, Journal of Public Policy.

[11]  Brian W. Hogwood,et al.  The pathology of public policy , 1985 .

[12]  W. Keegan.  Mrs. Thatcher's Economic Experiment , 1984 .

[13]  William N. Dunn,et al.  Public Policy Analysis , 1981 .

[14]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[15]  B. Peters.  The Problem of Bureaucratic Government , 1981, The Journal of Politics.

[16]  Otwin Marenin.  On the Autonomy of the Democratic State , 1982, American Political Science Review.

[17]  Ernest R. Alexander,et al.  Design in the decision-making process , 1982 .

[18]  Thomas J. Sargent,et al.  Rational expectations and the theory of economic policy , 1976 .

[19]  A. Grant Jordan,et al.  Iron Triangles, Woolly Corporatism and Elastic Nets: Images of the Policy Process , 1981, Journal of Public Policy.

[20]  O. Hall.  A policy model appraisal paradigm , 1975 .

[21]  Robert E. Goodin,et al.  Political Theory And Public Policy , 1982 .

[22]  Amitai Etzioni.  The active society , 1968 .

[23]  Christopher Alexander.  Notes on the Synthesis of Form , 1964 .

[24]  James Tobin,et al.  The Monetarist Counter-Revolution Today-An Appraisal , 1981 .

[25]  R. Jackman,et al.  Prices and Quantities. , 1982 .

[26]  Charles Wolf,et al.  A Theory of Nonmarket Failure: Framework for Implementation Analysis , 1979, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[27]  Jeremy Richardson,et al.  Policy Styles in Western Europe , 1982 .

[28]  Karl R. Popper,et al.  The Open Society and Its Enemies , 1952 .

[29]  R. Merton.  Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .