Partial Input to Output Impacts in DEA: Production Considerations and Resource Sharing among Business Subunits

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a methodology for evaluating the relative efficiencies of peer decision-making units (DMUs), in a multiple input/output setting. While it is generally assumed that all outputs are impacted by all inputs, there are many situations where this may not be the case. For example, in a food manufacturing setting, certain foods are exempt from nutrition labeling and as a result are not influenced by labeling resources. This chapter extends the conventional DEA methodology to allow for the measurement of technical efficiency in situations where only partial input-to-output impacts exist. The new methodology involves viewing the DMU as a business unit, consisting of a set of mutually exclusive subunits, each of which can be treated in the conventional DEA sense.

[1]  A. Charnes,et al.  Polyhedral Cone-Ratio DEA Models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks , 1990 .

[2]  B. Golany,et al.  Controlling Factor Weights in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1991 .

[3]  W. Cook,et al.  Multicomponent Efficiency Measurement and Shared Inputs in Data Envelopment Analysis: An Application to Sales and Service Performance in Bank Branches , 2000 .

[4]  A. Bessent,et al.  Efficiency Frontier Determination by Constrained Facet Analysis , 1988, Oper. Res..

[5]  S. Zionts,et al.  Programming with linear fractional functionals , 1968 .

[6]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Network DEA: Additive efficiency decomposition , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  R. Willig,et al.  Economies of scope , 1981 .

[8]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[9]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[10]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective , 2010 .

[11]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming , 1990 .

[12]  W. Cook,et al.  Sales performance measurement in bank branches , 2001 .

[13]  R. Dyson,et al.  Reducing Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1988 .

[14]  Y. Braunstein,et al.  A Composite Cost Function for Multiproduct Firms with an Application to Economies of Scope in Banking , 1992 .

[15]  R. Färe,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY AND INTERMEDIATE PRODUCTS: A FRONTIER APPROACH , 1995 .