The role of memory representation in the vigilance decrement

Working memory load is critically important for the overall level of performance on vigilance tasks. However, its role in a key aspect of vigilance—sensitivity decrement over time—is unclear. We used a dual-task procedure in which either a spatial or a nonspatial working memory task was performed simultaneously with a spatial vigilance task for 20 min. Sensitivity in the vigilance task declined over time when the concurrent task involved spatial working memory. In contrast, there was no sensitivity decrement with a nonspatial working memory task. The results provide the first evidence of a specific role for working memory representation in vigilance decrement. The findings are also consistent with a multiple resource theory in which separate resources for memory representation and cognitive control operations are differentially susceptible to depletion over time, depending on the demands of the task at hand.

[1]  M. Loeb,et al.  The Psychology of Vigilance , 1982 .

[2]  W H Teichner,et al.  The Detection of a Simple Visual Signal as a Function of Time of Watch , 1974, Human factors.

[3]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Working Memory and Vigilance: Evidence from Normal Aging and Alzheimer's Disease , 1999, Brain and Cognition.

[4]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Sensing and decision-making components of the signal-regularity effect in vigilance performance , 1992 .

[5]  J. F. Mackworth.  Vigilance and habituation: A neuropsychological approach , 1969 .

[6]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Stimulus Comparison Strategies and Task Demands in Successive Discrimination , 1994 .

[7]  R. Parasuraman,et al.  Interaction of signal discriminability and task type in vigilance decrement , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Time-Related Changes in Neural Systems Underlying Attention and Arousal During the Performance of an Auditory Vigilance Task , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Developments in the concept of working memory. , 1994 .

[10]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Capacity Demand in Dual-Task Monitoring of Simultaneous and Successive Vigilance Tasks , 1988 .

[11]  R. McCarley,et al.  Measurement of visual sustained attention in schizophrenia using signal detection analysis and a newly developed computerized CPT task , 1990, Schizophrenia Research.

[12]  A. Kramer,et al.  Object-based attentional selection and aging. , 1999, Psychology and aging.

[13]  B. G. Rule,et al.  Adult age differences in working memory. , 1989, Psychology and aging.

[14]  Judi E. See,et al.  Meta-analysis of the sensitivity decrement in vigilance. , 1995 .

[15]  R Parasuraman,et al.  Visual sustained attention: image degradation produces rapid sensitivity decrement over time. , 1983, Science.

[16]  R. Parasuraman.  Vigilance, monitoring, and search. , 1986 .

[17]  J. Jonides,et al.  Neuroimaging analyses of human working memory. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  R. Parasuraman.  Memory load and event rate control sensitivity decrements in sustained attention. , 1979, Science.

[19]  T. Marill.  Detection theory and psychophysics , 1956 .

[20]  J. Deese.  Principles of Psychology , 1923, Nature.

[21]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Control and Automatic Processing During Tasks Requiring Sustained Attention: A New Approach to Vigilance , 1981 .

[22]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[23]  W. N. Dember,et al.  Tests of vigilance taxonomy. , 1998 .

[24]  J. Cohen,et al.  Context, cortex, and dopamine: a connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia. , 1992, Psychological review.

[25]  J. Grafman,et al.  Sustained attention deficits in patients with lesions of posterior cortex , 1998, Neuropsychologia.