The Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Endonasal Silicone Tube Intubation According to Nasolacrimal Duct Resistance

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical result of silicone tube intubation through Hasner’s valve according to nasolacrimal duct resistance under intranasal endoscopic guidance in partial acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction patients. Methods: The present study enrolled a total of 50 eyes from 31 patients diagnosed with partial acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in the Department of Ophthalmology, Chonbuk National University Hospital from 2012 January to 2012 December. Silicone tube intubation was done through the Hasner’s valve and confirmed by intranasal endoscopy and the nasolacrimal duct resistance was measured. Success was defined as the disappearance of epiphora, and failure was defined as the maintenance of epiphora after silicone tube intubation. Results: There were 8 male patients and 23 female patients, ages between 32 to 80 and the average age was 61.4 years old. 3 eyes of 3 patients (6%) had no resistance, 26 eyes of 17 patients (52%) had mild resistance, 17 eyes of 15 patients (34%) had moderate resistance and 4 eyes of 3 patients (8%) had severe resistance. The success was 44 eyes (88%) and the failure was 6 eyes (12%). In the no resistance and mild resistance groups the success rates were both 100%, while an 82% of success rate in the moderate resistance group and 25% success rate in the severe resistance group were observed. The success rates showed clear distinction between severe, moderate and mild resistance patients. Conclusions: Ensuring the passage of a silicone tube through Hasner’s valve increases the success rate in the functional aspect; however, the resistance of the nasolacrimal duct can highly influence the success rate. Therefore, if a patient has severe nasolacrimal duct resistance, dacryocystorhinostomy should be considered earlier. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2016;57(1):1-5

[1]  Jae-Wook Yang,et al.  The Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Silicone Tube Intubation for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction , 2012 .

[2]  U. Keklikçi,et al.  Is it necessary to accompany probing with endoscopy in cases of congenital nasolacrimal canal obstruction? , 2010, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[3]  R. Yeatts,et al.  Effect of Short-Duration Silicone Intubation in Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction , 2008, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  Amir-Masoud Salari,et al.  A simplified method for nasolacrimal silicon intubation , 2008, Acta ophthalmologica.

[5]  Yong Jae Lee,et al.  Long-term Results of Silicone Tube Intubation in Incomplete Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction (NLDO) , 2008 .

[6]  B. Yazıcı,et al.  Silicone intubation with the Ritleng method in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. , 2006, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[7]  W. Choi,et al.  Intranasal endoscopic diagnosis and treatment in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. , 2002, Ophthalmic surgery and lasers.

[8]  W. Yoon,et al.  The Effect of Silicone Tube Intubation in Pediatric Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction , 2002 .

[9]  M. Onerci,et al.  Reappraisal of probing of the congenital obstruction of the nasolacrimal system: is nasal endoscopy essential? , 2001, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[10]  H. Kim,et al.  Silicone Tube Intubation in Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction , 2000 .

[11]  M. Orhan,et al.  Intranasal endoscopic silicone intubation for congenital obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct in children. , 1997, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology.

[12]  S. H. Lee,et al.  Silicone Intubation for Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Adult , 1997 .

[13]  S. T. Conway Evaluation and Management of “Functional” Nasolacrimal Blockage: Results of a Survey of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery , 1994, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  Michael O'Keefe,et al.  Results of Crawford tube intubation in children , 1993, Acta ophthalmologica.

[15]  C. Kalogeropoulos,et al.  Silicone Intubation as an Alternative to Dacryocystorhinostomy for Nasolacrimal Drainage Obstruction in Adults , 1993, European journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  A. Nasr,et al.  Silastic Intubation in Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: A Study of 129 Eyes , 1993, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[17]  J. Ruban,et al.  [Role of nasolacrimal intubation in the treatment of lacrimation caused by congenital lacrimal duct obstruction in infants]. , 1993, Journal francais d'ophtalmologie.

[18]  E. Chung,et al.  Clinical Observation on Silicone Intubation in Obstruction of lacrimal Drainage System , 1990 .

[19]  R. Dortzbach,et al.  Silicone Intubation for Partial and Total Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Adults , 1985, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[20]  B. Kushner,et al.  Silicone intubation for obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct in children. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  F. D. Ellis,et al.  Silicone intubation in children with nasolacrimal obstruction. , 1980, Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus.

[22]  R. Anderson,et al.  Indications, complications and results with silicone stents. , 1979, Ophthalmology.

[23]  J. Rathbun,et al.  Silicone tube intubation of the lacrimal drainage system. , 1979, Archives of ophthalmology.

[24]  L. Lauring Silicone intubation of the lacrimal system: pitfalls, problems and complications. , 1976, Annals of ophthalmology.

[25]  C. Keith Intubation of the lacrimal passages. , 1968, American journal of ophthalmology.