Optimizing Relevance Ranking to Enhance the User's Discovery Experience
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Diane H. Sonnenwald,et al. User perspectives on relevance criteria: A comparison among relevant, partially relevant, and not-relevant judgments , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[2] Tefko Saracevic,et al. RELEVANCE: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[3] Karen Markey,et al. The Online Library Catalog: Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained? , 2007, D Lib Mag..
[4] C. D. Rosa. College students' perceptions of libraries and information resources : a report to the OCLC membership , 2005 .
[5] Tamar Sadeh. Multiple Dimensions of Search Results , 2008 .
[6] Stephen Hearn,et al. Discoverability Phase 2 Final Report , 2011 .
[7] Theresa Dirndorfer Anderson,et al. Uncertainty in action: observing information seeking within the creative processes of scholarly research , 2006, Inf. Res..
[8] Karen Markey. Twenty-five years of end-user searching, Part 1: Research findings , 2007 .
[9] Tefko Saracevic. Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part III: Behavior and effects of relevance , 2007 .
[10] Marti A. Hearst. Clustering versus faceted categories for information exploration , 2006, Commun. ACM.
[11] Murilo Bastos da Cunha. Online Computer Library Center. Perceptions of libraries. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC, 2005. , 2007 .