Determining Surface Stimulation Parameters With Computational Cardiac Electrophysiology to Defibrillate Human Ventricles

Aim: To determine the minimal surface stimulus strength necessary to defibrillate human ventricles. Methods: We determined this in a 10cmx10cmx1cm finite element model of left ventricular (LV) tissue with human electrophysiology. It was paced until steady-state at 1.3 Hz with S1 stimuli (LV apex) at 2x threshold. A single S2 stimulus (apical posterior corner) was delivered at 2x threshold 300 ms after the last S1 to initiate reentry at the model's center. To terminate reentry, an S3 stimulus on the entire epicardial, endocardial, or both surfaces was applied 2 seconds after S2. Starting at the capture threshold, S3 strength was doubled until reentry terminated. Results: Minimum stimulus strength to terminate reentry with endocardial and epicardial S3 was > 512-fold capture threshold, but only 16-fold for S3 applied to both surfaces simultaneously. Extending the S3 depth to the midmyocardium lowered the minimum stimulus strength for defibrillation to 8-fold capture threshold on the endocardium and 16-fold on the epicardium. This difference corresponds to a longer wavelength for reentry in the endocardium versus epicardium (6.6 cm vs 5.3 cm). Conclusion: Stimulating both the endocardial and epicardial surfaces at $\ge 16$ times capture threshold is optimal to defibrillate human ventricles, and is decreased further for stimuli applied deeper in the tissue.

[1]  John A Rogers,et al.  Patient-specific flexible and stretchable devices for cardiac diagnostics and therapy. , 2014, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[2]  Y. Rudy,et al.  Ionic Current Basis of Electrocardiographic Waveforms: A Model Study , 2002, Circulation research.

[3]  K. T. ten Tusscher,et al.  Alternans and spiral breakup in a human ventricular tissue model. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[4]  N. Trayanova,et al.  Mechanisms linking electrical alternans and clinical ventricular arrhythmia in human heart failure. , 2016, Heart rhythm.

[5]  Thomas O'Hara,et al.  Computational cardiology: how computer simulations could be used to develop new therapies and advance existing ones. , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[6]  A. Adgey,et al.  Frequency analysis of ventricular fibrillation and resuscitation success. , 1992, The Quarterly journal of medicine.

[7]  G. Plank,et al.  A Novel Rule-Based Algorithm for Assigning Myocardial Fiber Orientation to Computational Heart Models , 2012, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  U Ravens,et al.  Task Force on Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2001, European heart journal.

[9]  Thomas V. Karathanos,et al.  Opsin spectral sensitivity determines the effectiveness of optogenetic termination of ventricular fibrillation in the human heart: a simulation study , 2016, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  M. Mansour,et al.  Spatially Distributed Dominant Excitation Frequencies Reveal Hidden Organization in Atrial Fibrillation in the Langendorff‐Perfused Sheep Heart , 2000, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[11]  Wojciech Zareba,et al.  Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in MADIT II: frequency, mechanisms, predictors, and survival impact. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.