Analyzing LC-MS/MS data by spectral count and ion abundance: two case studies.

In comparative proteomics studies, LC-MS/MS data is generally quantified using one or both of two measures: the spectral count, derived from the identification of MS/MS spectra, or some measure of ion abundance derived from the LC-MS data. Here we contrast the performance of these measures and show that ion abundance is the more sensitive. We also examine how the conclusions of a comparative analysis are influenced by the manner in which the LC-MS/MS data is 'rolled up' to the protein level, and show that divergent conclusions obtained using different rollups can be informative. Our analysis is based on two publicly available reference data sets, BIATECH-54 and CPTAC, which were developed for the purpose of assessing methods used in label-free differential proteomic studies. We find that the use of the ion abundance measure reveals properties of both data sets not readily apparent using the spectral count.

[1]  Michael K. Coleman,et al.  Correlation of relative abundance ratios derived from peptide ion chromatograms and spectrum counting for quantitative proteomic analysis using stable isotope labeling. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[2]  Gunther Schadow,et al.  Protein quantification in label-free LC-MS experiments. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[3]  John D. Storey,et al.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Alexey I Nesvizhskii,et al.  Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  Hyungwon Choi,et al.  Adaptive discriminant function analysis and reranking of MS/MS database search results for improved peptide identification in shotgun proteomics. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[6]  Mehdi Mirzaei,et al.  Less label, more free: Approaches in label‐free quantitative mass spectrometry , 2011, Proteomics.

[7]  Henry H. N. Lam,et al.  Data analysis and bioinformatics tools for tandem mass spectrometry in proteomics. , 2008, Physiological genomics.

[8]  Lukas N. Mueller,et al.  SuperHirn – a novel tool for high resolution LC‐MS‐based peptide/protein profiling , 2007, Proteomics.

[9]  J. Yates,et al.  A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[10]  K. Resing,et al.  Comparison of Label-free Methods for Quantifying Human Proteins by Shotgun Proteomics*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[11]  E. Kolker,et al.  Development of BIATECH‐54 standard mixtures for assessment of protein identification and relative expression , 2007, Proteomics.

[12]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Assigning significance to peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry using decoy databases. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[13]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R , 2005, Bioinform..

[14]  M. Mann,et al.  Exponentially Modified Protein Abundance Index (emPAI) for Estimation of Absolute Protein Amount in Proteomics by the Number of Sequenced Peptides per Protein*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[15]  Steven P Gygi,et al.  Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry , 2007, Nature Methods.

[16]  J. Yates,et al.  An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database , 1994, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[17]  M. Mann,et al.  MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  J. Koziol,et al.  Label-free, normalized quantification of complex mass spectrometry data for proteomics analysis , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  Jacob D. Jaffe,et al.  MapQuant: Open‐source software for large‐scale protein quantification , 2006, Proteomics.

[20]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Options and considerations when selecting a quantitative proteomics strategy , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  Heidi Zhang,et al.  Integrated pipeline for mass spectrometry-based discovery and confirmation of biomarkers demonstrated in a mouse model of breast cancer. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[22]  Birgit Schilling,et al.  Interlaboratory Study Characterizing a Yeast Performance Standard for Benchmarking LC-MS Platform Performance* , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[23]  Jacob D. Jaffe,et al.  PEPPeR, a Platform for Experimental Proteomic Pattern Recognition*S , 2006, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[24]  D. Tabb,et al.  MyriMatch: highly accurate tandem mass spectral peptide identification by multivariate hypergeometric analysis. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[25]  Jianhua Huang,et al.  A statistical framework for protein quantitation in bottom-up MS-based proteomics , 2009, Bioinform..

[26]  Xiaoyun Fu,et al.  Spectral index for assessment of differential protein expression in shotgun proteomics. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[27]  Robertson Craig,et al.  TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. , 2004, Bioinformatics.

[28]  Linfeng Wu,et al.  Role of spectral counting in quantitative proteomics , 2010, Expert review of proteomics.

[29]  Stephan C Peipei Ping.  Peek a peak: A glance at statistics for quantitative label-free proteomics , 2013 .

[30]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  A Software Suite for the Generation and Comparison of Peptide Arrays from Sets of Data Collected by Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[31]  E. Marcotte,et al.  Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[32]  D. Chelius,et al.  Identification and relative quantitation of protein mixtures by enzymatic digestion followed by capillary reversed-phase liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[33]  Hyungwon Choi,et al.  Significance Analysis of Spectral Count Data in Label-free Shotgun Proteomics*S , 2008, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[34]  J. Yates,et al.  A correlation algorithm for the automated quantitative analysis of shotgun proteomics data. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[35]  N. Samatova,et al.  Detecting differential and correlated protein expression in label-free shotgun proteomics. , 2006, Journal of proteome research.