Decision factors affecting line orientation judgments in the method of single stimuli

Just noticeable differences in orientation are smaller at principal standard orientations than at oblique standard orientations when they are measured with the method of single stimuli. We determined whether this oblique effect is due to an anisotropy in decision factors. A first series of experiments showed that the subjects compare the stimulus with an internal criterion, and that this decision rule is used at all standard orientations. A second series of experiments determined the influence on the oblique effect of nonsensorial variables related to criterion setting. The results strongly suggest that the effect is not due to a criterial noise anisotropy and that criterion-setting processes are similar at principal and oblique standard orientations. The latter conclusion was also supported by an analysis of the sequential stimulus and response dependencies in this task. Hence, it appears that the oblique effect in line orientation discrimination, when it is measured with the method of single stimuli, is due not to decision factors but to a sensorially based anisotropy.

[1]  R. Kirk.  Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[2]  G. Orban,et al.  Meridional variations in orientation discrimination in normal and amblyopic vision. , 1984, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  R Vogels,et al.  Human orientation discrimination: changes with eccentricity in normal and amblyopic vision. , 1986, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  G. A. Orban,et al.  Receptive field properties of neurones in visual area 1 and visual area 2 in the baboon , 1985, Neuroscience.

[5]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[6]  Ethel Matin,et al.  Conditioned tilt naming: A modified absolute judgment method is used to measure the oblique effect , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  G. Orban,et al.  The influence of eccentricity on receptive field types and orientation selectivity in areas 17 and 18 of the cat , 1981, Brain Research.

[8]  Andrew Faulkner,et al.  THE SETTING AND MAINTENANCE OF CRITERIA REPRESENTING LEVELS OF CONFIDENCE , 1984 .

[9]  G. Orban,et al.  Human orientation discrimination tested with long stimuli , 1984, Vision Research.

[10]  G. Orban,et al.  Decision processes in visual discrimination of line orientation. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  D. Brillinger,et al.  Multivariate Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. , 1964 .

[12]  E Matin,et al.  Acuity for orientation measured with a sequential recognition task and signal detection methods , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  M. Treisman,et al.  American Psychological Association, Inc, A Theory of Criterion Setting With an Application to Sequential Dependencies , 2022 .