Dual-energy CT head bone and hard plaque removal for quantification of calcified carotid stenosis: utility and comparison with digital subtraction angiography

We evaluated quantification of calcified carotid stenosis by dual-energy (DE) CTA and dual-energy head bone and hard plaque removal (DE hard plaque removal) and compared the results to those of digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Eighteen vessels (13 patients) with densely calcified carotid stenosis were examined by dual-source CT in the dual-energy mode (tube voltages 140 kV and 80 kV). Head bone and hard plaques were removed from the dual-energy images by using commercial software. Carotid stenosis was quantified according to NASCET criteria on MIP images and DSA images at the same plane. Correlation between DE CTA and DSA was determined by cross tabulation. Accuracies for stenosis detection and grading were calculated. Stenosis could be evaluated in all vessels by DE CTA after applying DE hard plaque removal. In contrast, conventional CTA failed to show stenosis in 13 out of 18 vessels due to overlapping hard plaque. Good correlation between DE plaque removal images and DSA images was observed (r2 = 0.9504) for stenosis grading. Sensitivity and specificity to detect hemodynamically relevant (>70%) stenosis was 100% and 92%, respectively. Dual-energy head bone and hard plaque removal is a promising tool for the evaluation of densely calcified carotid stenosis.

[1]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system , 2006, European Radiology.

[2]  M. Reiser,et al.  Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience , 2007, European Radiology.

[3]  C. Warlow,et al.  MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis , 1991, The Lancet.

[4]  H. Dinkel,et al.  Value of the CT angiography in the diagnosis of common carotid artery bifurcation disease: CT angiography versus digital subtraction angiography and color flow Doppler. , 2001, European journal of radiology.

[5]  G. Sicard.  MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis: European Carotid Surgery Trialist' Collaborative Group. Lancet 1991;337:1235-43 , 1992 .

[6]  L. Soinne,et al.  CT angiographic analysis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of manual assessment, semiautomatic vessel analysis, and digital subtraction angiography. , 2007, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[7]  C Marsault,et al.  Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. , 2001, Radiology.

[8]  Glenn B. Anderson,et al.  CT Angiography for the Detection and Characterization of Carotid Artery Bifurcation Disease , 2000, Stroke.

[9]  H. Venema,et al.  CT angiography of the circle of Willis and intracranial internal carotid arteries: maximum intensity projection with matched mask bone elimination-feasibility study. , 2001, Radiology.

[10]  E Klotz,et al.  Bone-subtraction Ct Angiography for the Evaluation of Intracranial Aneurysms Materials and Methods , 2004 .

[11]  M Lell,et al.  Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis with multisection CT and MR imaging: influence of imaging modality and postprocessing. , 2007, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[12]  J W Sayre,et al.  Bone-Subtraction CT Angiography: Evaluation of Two Different Fully Automated Image-Registration Procedures for Interscan Motion Compensation , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[13]  D. Sackett,et al.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  S. C. Johnston,et al.  Evaluation of carotid stenosis using CT angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA , 2004, Neurology.

[15]  G. Hunter,et al.  Increasing Contrast Agent Concentration Improves Enhancement in First-Pass CT Perfusion , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[16]  D. Sackett,et al.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Luca Saba,et al.  Multidetector-row CT angiography in the study of atherosclerotic carotid arteries , 2007, Neuroradiology.