A Variance Distribution Model of Surface EMG Signals Based on Inverse Gamma Distribution

Objective: This paper describes the formulation of a surface electromyogram (EMG) model capable of representing the variance distribution of EMG signals. Methods: In the model, EMG signals are handled based on a Gaussian white noise process with a mean of zero for each variance value. EMG signal variance is taken as a random variable that follows inverse gamma distribution, allowing the representation of noise superimposed onto this variance. Variance distribution estimation based on marginal likelihood maximization is also outlined in this paper. The procedure can be approximated using rectified and smoothed EMG signals, thereby allowing the determination of distribution parameters in real time at low computational cost. Results: A simulation experiment was performed to evaluate the accuracy of distribution estimation using artificially generated EMG signals, with results demonstrating that the proposed model's accuracy is higher than that of maximum-likelihood-based estimation. Analysis of variance distribution using real EMG data also suggested a relationship between variance distribution and signal-dependent noise. Conclusion: The study reported here was conducted to examine the performance of a proposed surface EMG model capable of representing variance distribution and a related distribution parameter estimation method. Experiments using artificial and real EMG data demonstrated the validity of the model. Significance: Variance distribution estimated using the proposed model exhibits potential in the estimation of muscle force.

[1]  Yoshiyuki Sankai,et al.  Exoskeletal Spine and Shoulders for Full Body Exoskeletons in Health Care , 2011 .

[2]  J Perry,et al.  Electromyography and motion analysis of the upper extremity in sports. , 1986, Physical therapy.

[3]  P. Dario,et al.  Control of multifunctional prosthetic hands by processing the electromyographic signal. , 2002, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[4]  M I Harba,et al.  Optimizing the acquisition and processing of surface electromyographic signals. , 1981, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[5]  Viktor Witkovský,et al.  Computing the Distribution of a Linear Combination of Inverted Gamma Variables , 2001, Kybernetika.

[6]  Emanuel Todorov,et al.  Cosine Tuning Minimizes Motor Errors , 2002, Neural Computation.

[7]  Toshio Tsuji,et al.  The Cybernetic Rehabilitation Aid: Preliminary Results for Wrist and Elbow Motions in Healthy Subjects , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  T. Moritani,et al.  Reexamination of the relationship between the surface integrated electromyogram (IEMG) and force of isometric contraction. , 1978, American journal of physical medicine.

[9]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[10]  S. Metral,et al.  Relationship between force and integrated EMG activity during voluntary isometric anisotonic contraction , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[11]  J. Saunders,et al.  Relation of human electromyogram to muscular tension. , 1952, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  R. Stein,et al.  The relation between the surface electromyogram and muscular force. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  P. Dolan,et al.  The effects of muscle length and force output on the EMG power spectrum of the erector spinae. , 1996, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[14]  Honghai Liu,et al.  Human Hand Motion Analysis With Multisensory Information , 2014, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[15]  Guido Bugmann,et al.  A note on the probability distribution function of the surface electromyogram signal☆ , 2013, Brain Research Bulletin.

[16]  Le Li,et al.  Assistive Control System Using Continuous Myoelectric Signal in Robot-Aided Arm Training for Patients After Stroke , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  D. Winter Biomechanics of Human Movement , 1980 .

[18]  Robert W. Mann,et al.  Myoelectric Signal Processing: Optimal Estimation Applied to Electromyography - Part I: Derivation of the Optimal Myoprocessor , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Junggyu Yoon,et al.  Motion Analysis and EMG Analysis of the Pelvis and Lower Extremity according to the Width Variation of the Base of Support , 2012 .

[20]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  Myoelectric signal versus force relationship in different human muscles. , 1983, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[21]  B. Bigland-ritchie,et al.  Linear and non-linear surface EMG/force relationships in human muscles. An anatomical/functional argument for the existence of both. , 1983, American journal of physical medicine.

[22]  Toshio Tsuji,et al.  Impedance Regulations in Musculo-Motor Control System and the Manipulation Ability of the End-Point , 1988 .

[23]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. 1 Online Electromyographic Control of a Robotic , 2022 .

[24]  Mohammad Hassan Moradi,et al.  Evaluation of the forearm EMG signal features for the control of a prosthetic hand. , 2003, Physiological measurement.

[25]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Making smooth moves , 2022 .

[26]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Myoelectric Signal Processing: Optimal Estimation Applied to Electromyography - Part II: Experimental Demonstration of Optimal Myoprocessor Performance , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  N. Hogan,et al.  Probability density of the surface electromyogram and its relation to amplitude detectors , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  Kelvin E. Jones,et al.  Sources of signal-dependent noise during isometric force production. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  Toshio Tsuji,et al.  A human-assisting manipulator teleoperated by EMG signals and arm motions , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..