Some Routing Schemes and Mobility Models for Real Terrain MANET

The primary challenges in mobile ad hoc network (MANET) are presence of obstacles, mobility, energy efficiency and network in dynamic topology environment. Efficient routing with obstacles avoidance in dynamic topology is a critical issue in MANET. Many mobility patterns have been recommended for the movement of nodes in presence of obstacles in MANET terrain. Some obstacles avoiding routing techniques are also proposed by some popular researchers. In this paper, many related articles have been reviewed and briefly discussed. The paper outlines advantages and drawbacks of each approach to get possible research scope in route planning in dynamic MANET topology in presence of obstacles.

[1]  David A. Maltz,et al.  Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 1994, Mobidata.

[2]  Ahmed Helmy,et al.  Weighted waypoint mobility model and its impact on ad hoc networks , 2005, MOCO.

[3]  Tracy Camp,et al.  A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research , 2002, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[4]  Hassan Mathkour,et al.  ALOE: autonomic locating of obstructing entities in MANETs , 2018, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing.

[5]  Md. Habibur Rahman,et al.  Simulation and analysis of ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing protocol , 2009, ICIS '09.

[6]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  A survey on routing algorithms for wireless Ad-Hoc and mesh networks , 2012, Comput. Networks.

[7]  Christian Bettstetter,et al.  Smooth is better than sharp: a random mobility model for simulation of wireless networks , 2001, MSWIM '01.

[8]  Bruce Lowekamp,et al.  A structured group mobility model for the simulation of mobile ad hoc networks , 2004, MobiWac '04.

[9]  Christian Bettstetter,et al.  Mobility modeling in wireless networks: categorization, smooth movement, and border effects , 2001, MOCO.

[10]  Mesut Günes,et al.  CosMos - Communication Scenario and Mobility Scenario Generator for Mobile Ad-hoc Networks , 2005, ICWN.

[11]  Louise E. Moser,et al.  An analysis of the optimum node density for ad hoc mobile networks , 2001, ICC 2001. IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37240).

[12]  Emad Qaddoura,et al.  Performance evaluation of multicast ad hoc on-demand distance vector protocol , 2007, Comput. Commun..

[13]  Geetha Jayakumar,et al.  Reference Point Group Mobility and Random Waypoint Models in Performance Evaluation of MANET Routing Protocols , 2008, J. Comput. Networks Commun..

[14]  Kevin C. Almeroth,et al.  Real-world environment models for mobile network evaluation , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[15]  Kevin C. Almeroth,et al.  Towards realistic mobility models for mobile ad hoc networks , 2003, MobiCom '03.

[16]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  An ad hoc mobility model founded on social network theory , 2004, MSWiM '04.

[17]  Elizabeth M. Belding-Royer,et al.  A review of current routing protocols for ad hoc mobile wireless networks , 1999, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[18]  Houda Labiod Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks , 2007 .

[19]  Imrich Chlamtac,et al.  Mobile ad hoc networking: imperatives and challenges , 2003, Ad Hoc Networks.

[20]  Sugata Sanyal,et al.  Analysis of Dynamic Source Routing and Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Protocols for Different Mobility Models , 2007, First Asia International Conference on Modelling & Simulation (AMS'07).

[21]  B. Venkataramani,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Adhoc Networks with Different Multicast Routing Protocols and Mobility Models , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Advances in Recent Technologies in Communication and Computing.

[22]  C. Sathitwiriyawong,et al.  A Comparative Study of Random Waypoint and Gauss-Markov Mobility Models in the Performance Evaluation of MANET , 2006, 2006 International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies.

[23]  Christian Wagner,et al.  The Spatial Node Distribution of the Random Waypoint Mobility Model , 2002, WMAN.

[24]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  A community based mobility model for ad hoc network research , 2006, REALMAN '06.

[25]  Chirag Kumar Evaluation of MANET Performance in Presence of Obstacles , 2012 .

[26]  Seungmin Rho,et al.  Impact of Dynamic Path Loss Models in an Urban Obstacle Aware Ad Hoc Network Environment , 2015, J. Sensors.

[27]  Ulrich Killat,et al.  - The random waypoint city model -: user distribution in a street-based mobility model for wireless network simulations , 2005, WMASH.

[28]  Omer Waqar,et al.  Mobility and energy aware routing algorithm for mobile ad-hoc networks , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE).

[29]  Abdelfettah Belghith,et al.  CE-OLSR: a Cartography and Stability Enhanced OLSR for Dynamic MANETs with Obstacles , 2012, KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems.

[30]  Xiaoguang Fan,et al.  A Clustering Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2016 .

[31]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Highly Dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing (DSDV) for mobile computers , 1994, SIGCOMM.

[32]  Fabián E. Bustamante,et al.  An integrated mobility and traffic model for vehicular wireless networks , 2005, VANET '05.

[33]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Multicast operation of the ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing protocol , 1999, MobiCom.

[34]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing , 1999, Proceedings WMCSA'99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.

[35]  Sven Bittner,et al.  The area graph-based mobility model and its impact on data dissemination , 2005, Third IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops.

[36]  Raja Datta,et al.  Mobility-aware route selection technique for mobile ad hoc networks , 2017, IET Wirel. Sens. Syst..