Structural Changes in Boreal Forests Can Be Quantified Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning

Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) has been adopted as a feasible technique to digitize trees and forest stands, providing accurate information on tree and forest structural attributes. However, there is limited understanding on how a variety of forest structural changes can be quantified using TLS in boreal forest conditions. In this study, we assessed the accuracy and feasibility of TLS in quantifying changes in the structure of boreal forests. We collected TLS data and field reference from 37 sample plots in 2014 (T1) and 2019 (T2). Tree stems typically have planar, vertical, and cylindrical characteristics in a point cloud, and thus we applied surface normal filtering, point cloud clustering, and RANSAC-cylinder filtering to identify these geometries and to characterize trees and forest stands at both time points. The results strengthened the existing knowledge that TLS has the capacity to characterize trees and forest stands in space and showed that TLS could characterize structural changes in time in boreal forest conditions. Root-mean-square-errors (RMSEs) in the estimates for changes in the tree attributes were 0.99–1.22 cm for diameter at breast height (∆dbh), 44.14–55.49 cm2 for basal area (∆g), and 1.91–4.85 m for tree height (∆h). In general, tree attributes were estimated more accurately for Scots pine trees, followed by Norway spruce and broadleaved trees. At the forest stand level, an RMSE of 0.60–1.13 cm was recorded for changes in basal area-weighted mean diameter (∆Dg), 0.81–2.26 m for changes in basal area-weighted mean height (∆Hg), 1.40–2.34 m2/ha for changes in mean basal area (∆G), and 74–193 n/ha for changes in the number of trees per hectare (∆TPH). The plot-level accuracy was higher in Scots pine-dominated sample plots than in Norway spruce-dominated and mixed-species sample plots. TLS-derived tree and forest structural attributes at time points T1 and T2 differed significantly from each other (p < 0.05). If there was an increase or decrease in dbh, g, h, height of the crown base, crown ratio, Dg, Hg, or G recorded in the field, a similar outcome was achieved by using TLS. Our results provided new information on the feasibility of TLS for the purposes of forest ecosystem growth monitoring.

[1]  M. Fournier,et al.  The use of terrestrial LiDAR technology in forest science: application fields, benefits and challenges , 2011, Annals of Forest Science.

[2]  Kim Calders,et al.  Improved Supervised Learning-Based Approach for Leaf and Wood Classification From LiDAR Point Clouds of Forests , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  Sébastien Bauwens,et al.  Forest Inventory with Terrestrial LiDAR: A Comparison of Static and Hand-Held Mobile Laser Scanning , 2016 .

[4]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Detecting Changes in Forest Structure over Time with Bi-Temporal Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data , 2012, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[5]  Hans-Gerd Maas,et al.  Automatic forest inventory parameter determination from terrestrial laser scanner data , 2008 .

[6]  Yi Lin,et al.  A low-cost multi-sensoral mobile mapping system and its feasibility for tree measurements , 2010 .

[7]  Lin Cao,et al.  Estimating forest structural attributes using UAV-LiDAR data in Ginkgo plantations , 2018, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Investigating the Feasibility of Multi-Scan Terrestrial Laser Scanning to Characterize Tree Communities in Southern Boreal Forests , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[9]  Friedrich Leisch,et al.  Automatic Mapping of Forest Stands Based on Three-Dimensional Point Clouds Derived from Terrestrial Laser-Scanning , 2017 .

[10]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Examining Changes in Stem Taper and Volume Growth with Two-Date 3D Point Clouds , 2019, Forests.

[11]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Airborne Laser Scanning Outperforms the Alternative 3D Techniques in Capturing Variation in Tree Height and Forest Density in Southern Boreal Forests , 2018 .

[12]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Outlook for the Next Generation’s Precision Forestry in Finland , 2014 .

[13]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Performance of terrestrial laser scanning to characterize managed Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands is dependent on forest structural variation , 2020 .

[14]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Multisensorial Close-Range Sensing Generates Benefits for Characterization of Managed Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) Stands , 2020, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[15]  Zhongke Feng,et al.  Applicability of personal laser scanning in forestry inventory , 2019, PloS one.

[16]  Markku Åkerblom,et al.  Analysis of Geometric Primitives in Quantitative Structure Models of Tree Stems , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[17]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Fast Automatic Precision Tree Models from Terrestrial Laser Scanner Data , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[18]  Julia Armesto,et al.  Automatic dendrometry: Tree detection, tree height and diameter estimation using terrestrial laser scanning , 2018, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[19]  Harri Mäkinen,et al.  A new girth band for measuring stem diameter changes , 2004 .

[20]  M. Vastaranta,et al.  Detecting and characterizing downed dead wood using terrestrial laser scanning , 2019, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[21]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Graph SLAM correction for single scanner MLS forest data under boreal forest canopy , 2017 .

[22]  Pierre Machart.  Morphological Segmentation , 2009 .

[23]  Harri Kaartinen,et al.  Change Detection of Tree Biomass with Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Quantitative Structure Modelling , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[24]  Michael E. Schaepman,et al.  Quantifying 3D structure and occlusion in dense tropical and temperate forests using close-range LiDAR , 2019, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[25]  M. Disney,et al.  Leaf and wood classification framework for terrestrial LiDAR point clouds , 2019, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[26]  Andreas Fichtner,et al.  A high‐resolution approach for the spatiotemporal analysis of forest canopy space using terrestrial laser scanning data , 2018, Ecology and evolution.

[27]  M. Herold,et al.  Data acquisition considerations for Terrestrial Laser Scanning of forest plots , 2017 .

[28]  Jonathan P. Sheppard,et al.  Highly Accurate Tree Models Derived from Terrestrial Laser Scan Data: A Method Description , 2014 .

[29]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Automatic Stem Mapping Using Single-Scan Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[30]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Using multi-source data to map and model the predisposition of forests to wind disturbance , 2016 .

[31]  Wuming Zhang,et al.  A Novel Approach for the Detection of Standing Tree Stems from Plot-Level Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[32]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  The Use of a Mobile Laser Scanning System for Mapping Large Forest Plots , 2014, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[33]  Johan Holmgren,et al.  Single Tree Stem Profile Detection Using Terrestrial Laser Scanner Data, Flatness Saliency Features and Curvature Properties , 2016 .

[34]  F. M. Danson,et al.  Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Plot-Scale Forest Measurement , 2015, Current Forestry Reports.

[35]  Michael E. Schaepman,et al.  Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Forest Inventories—Tree Diameter Distribution and Scanner Location Impact on Occlusion , 2017 .

[36]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Assessing Precision in Conventional Field Measurements of Individual Tree Attributes , 2017 .

[37]  M. Vastaranta,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning in forest inventories , 2016 .

[38]  Xi Zhu,et al.  Foliar and woody materials discriminated using terrestrial LiDAR in a mixed natural forest , 2018, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[39]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Feasibility of Terrestrial laser scanning for collecting stem volume information from single trees , 2017 .

[40]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  International benchmarking of terrestrial laser scanning approaches for forest inventories , 2018, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[41]  Heinrich Spiecker,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning as a tool for assessing tree growth , 2017 .

[42]  Kamil Král,et al.  Arrangement of terrestrial laser scanner positions for area-wide stem mapping of natural forests , 2013 .

[43]  Markku Åkerblom,et al.  Non-intersecting leaf insertion algorithm for tree structure models , 2018, Interface Focus.

[44]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Autonomous Collection of Forest Field Reference - The Outlook and a First Step with UAV Laser Scanning , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[45]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed – A comparison study of tree height estimates from field measurement, airborne laser scanning and terrestrial laser scanning in a boreal forest , 2019, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[46]  Johannes Heinzel,et al.  Detecting Tree Stems from Volumetric TLS Data in Forest Environments with Rich Understory , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[47]  Andreas Fichtner,et al.  Neighbour species richness and local structural variability modulate aboveground allocation patterns and crown morphology of individual trees. , 2019, Ecology letters.

[48]  Sorin C. Popescu,et al.  Multi-temporal terrestrial laser scanning for modeling tree biomass change , 2014 .

[49]  H. Spiecker,et al.  DESCRIBING FOREST STANDS USING TERRESTRIAL LASER-SCANNING , 2004 .

[50]  Simon D. Jones,et al.  Assessing Metrics for Estimating Fire Induced Change in the Forest Understorey Structure Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[51]  Yuwei Chen,et al.  Multiplatform Mobile Laser Scanning: Usability and Performance , 2012, Sensors.

[52]  J. Granneman,et al.  Seeing the trees in the forest: selective electroporation of adipocytes within adipose tissue. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[53]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Accurate derivation of stem curve and volume using backpack mobile laser scanning , 2020, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[54]  Guang Zheng,et al.  Improved Salient Feature-Based Approach for Automatically Separating Photosynthetic and Nonphotosynthetic Components Within Terrestrial Lidar Point Cloud Data of Forest Canopies , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[55]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  The potential of dual-wavelength terrestrial lidar in early detection of Ips typographus (L.) infestation – Leaf water content as a proxy , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[56]  Christoph Gollob,et al.  Influence of Scanner Position and Plot Size on the Accuracy of Tree Detection and Diameter Estimation Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning on Forest Inventory Plots , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[57]  Fernando Carvajal-Ramírez,et al.  Evaluation of Fire Severity Indices Based on Pre- and Post-Fire Multispectral Imagery Sensed from UAV , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[58]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  On seeing the wood from the leaves and the role of voxel size in determining leaf area distribution of forests with terrestrial LiDAR , 2014 .

[59]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Under-canopy UAV laser scanning for accurate forest field measurements , 2020, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.