Reinforcement Learning Based Obstacle Avoidance for Autonomous Underwater Vehicle

Obstacle avoidance becomes a very challenging task for an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) in an unknown underwater environment during exploration process. Successful control in such case may be achieved using the model-based classical control techniques like PID and MPC but it required an accurate mathematical model of AUV and may fail due to parametric uncertainties, disturbance, or plant model mismatch. On the other hand, model-free reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm can be designed using actual behavior of AUV plant in an unknown environment and the learned control may not get affected by model uncertainties like a classical control approach. Unlike model-based control model-free RL based controller does not require to manually tune controller with the changing environment. A standard RL based one-step Q-learning based control can be utilized for obstacle avoidance but it has tendency to explore all possible actions at given state which may increase number of collision. Hence a modified Q-learning based control approach is proposed to deal with these problems in unknown environment. Furthermore, function approximation is utilized using neural network (NN) to overcome the continuous states and large state-space problems which arise in RL-based controller design. The proposed modified Q-learning algorithm is validated using MATLAB simulations by comparing it with standard Q-learning algorithm for single obstacle avoidance. Also, the same algorithm is utilized to deal with multiple obstacle avoidance problems.

[1]  Toshihiro Maki,et al.  Application of A* algorithm for real-time path re-planning of an unmanned surface vehicle avoiding underwater obstacles , 2014 .

[2]  Martin A. Riedmiller,et al.  Reinforcement learning in feedback control , 2011, Machine Learning.

[3]  Gerardo G. Acosta,et al.  Trajectory tracking algorithm for autonomous vehicles using adaptive reinforcement learning , 2015, OCEANS 2015 - MTS/IEEE Washington.

[4]  B. Bett,et al.  Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs): Their past, present and future contributions to the advancement of marine geoscience , 2014 .

[5]  Jinwhan Kim,et al.  Path optimization for marine vehicles in ocean currents using reinforcement learning , 2016 .

[6]  Zheping Yan,et al.  H∞ robust fault-tolerant controller design for an autonomous underwater vehicle’s navigation control system , 2010 .

[7]  Warren B. Powell,et al.  Approximate Dynamic Programming - Solving the Curses of Dimensionality , 2007 .

[8]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Introduction to Reinforcement Learning , 1998 .

[9]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Technical Note: Q-Learning , 2004, Machine Learning.

[10]  Warren B. Powell,et al.  “Approximate dynamic programming: Solving the curses of dimensionality” by Warren B. Powell , 2007, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[11]  Thor I. Fossen,et al.  Handbook of Marine Craft Hydrodynamics and Motion Control: Fossen/Handbook of Marine Craft Hydrodynamics and Motion Control , 2011 .

[12]  Haixiang Xu,et al.  Inverse optimal control for speed-varying path following of marine vessels with actuator dynamics , 2017 .

[13]  Faruk Kazi,et al.  Enhancing Reduced Order Model Predictive Control for Autonomous Underwater Vehicle , 2017, ICCSAMA.

[14]  Thor I. Fossen,et al.  Handbook of Marine Craft Hydrodynamics and Motion Control , 2011 .

[15]  Yumin Su,et al.  Dynamics modeling and simulation of autonomous underwater vehicles with appendages , 2013 .

[16]  Timothy Prestero,et al.  Verification of a six-degree of freedom simulation model for the REMUS autonomous underwater vehicle , 2001 .

[17]  N. M. Singh,et al.  LMI based depth control for autonomous underwater vehicle , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Control, Instrumentation, Communication and Computational Technologies (ICCICCT).

[18]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Q-learning , 1992, Machine Learning.

[19]  Jan Peters,et al.  Reinforcement learning in robotics: A survey , 2013, Int. J. Robotics Res..