Robustness versus evolvability: A paradigm revisited

Evolvability is the property of a biological system to quickly adapt to new requirements. Robustness seems to be the opposite. Nonetheless many biological systems display both properties—a puzzling observation, which has caused many debates over the last decades. A recently published model by Draghi et al. [Nature 463, 353–355 (2010)] elegantly circumvents complications of earlier in silico studies of molecular systems and provides an analytical solution, which is surprisingly independent from parameter choice. Depending on the mutation rate and the number of accessible phenotypes at any given genotype, evolvability and robustness can be reconciled. Further research will need to investigate if these parameter settings adequately represent the range of degrees of freedom covered by natural systems and if natural systems indeed assume a state in which both properties, robustness and evolvability, are featured.

[1]  M. Huynen.  Exploring phenotype space through neutral evolution , 1996, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[2]  Richard A Goldstein,et al.  Why are proteins so robust to site mutations? , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  A. Wagner.  Robustness and evolvability: a paradox resolved , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  M. Huynen,et al.  Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Erich Bornberg-Bauer,et al.  A structural model of latent evolutionary potentials underlying neutral networks in proteins. , 2007, HFSP journal.

[6]  E. Bornberg-Bauer,et al.  Modeling evolutionary landscapes: mutational stability, topology, and superfunnels in sequence space. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  M. Eigen,et al.  The molecular quasi-species , 2007 .

[8]  S. Lindquist,et al.  Hsp90 as a capacitor of phenotypic variation , 2002, Nature.

[9]  P. Cluzel,et al.  A natural class of robust networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  P. Wittkopp,et al.  Intraspecific Polymorphism to Interspecific Divergence: Genetics of Pigmentation in Drosophila , 2009, Science.

[11]  C. Ofria,et al.  Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rates leads to survival of the flattest , 2001, Nature.

[12]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.

[13]  G. Odell,et al.  The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module , 2000, Nature.

[14]  P. Schuster,et al.  From sequences to shapes and back: a case study in RNA secondary structures , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  P. Schuster,et al.  IR-98-039 / April Continuity in Evolution : On the Nature of Transitions , 1998 .

[16]  Richard A Goldstein,et al.  The structure of protein evolution and the evolution of protein structure. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[17]  G. Wagner,et al.  Mutational robustness can facilitate adaptation , 2010, Nature.