Prediction and the partial understanding of the law of large numbers

We examined people's understanding of the implications of the law of large numbers for prediction of social behavior and abilities. We found that people possess a partial understanding of the law: They sometimes recognize that one can predict more confidently from larger samples, but do not recognize that one can predict more confidently to larger samples. This partial understanding was reflected not only in the predictions subjects made, but also in the explanations they constructed to account for their predictions. It appears that people's intuitions include the notion that increasing the size of the predictor sample of events increases predictability, whereas they do not include the notion that increasing the size of the predicted sample of events increases predictability.

[1]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .

[2]  M. Kendall Rank Correlation Methods , 1949 .

[3]  M. May,et al.  Studies in deceit , 1929 .

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .

[5]  D. Krantz,et al.  The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[8]  R. Nisbett,et al.  The psychometrics of everyday life , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Subjective sensitivity analysis. , 1979 .

[10]  David H. Krantz,et al.  Inductive reasoning: Competence or skill? , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  A failure to replicate the Bem and Allen study of individual differences in cross-situational consistency. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  M. Fishbein Progress in social psychology , 1980 .

[13]  C. F. Kossack,et al.  Rank Correlation Methods , 1949 .

[14]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980. , 1982 .

[15]  Daryl J. Bem,et al.  ON PREDICTING SOME OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME: THE SEARCH FOR CROSS-SITUATIONAL CONSISTENCIES IN BEHAVIOR , 1974 .

[16]  D. Krantz,et al.  The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning , 1983 .

[17]  W. Mischel,et al.  Beyond déjà vu in the search for cross-situational consistency. , 1982 .

[18]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .