Quantitative Accuracy of Clinical 99mTc SPECT/CT Using Ordered-Subset Expectation Maximization with 3-Dimensional Resolution Recovery, Attenuation, and Scatter Correction

We present a calibration method of a clinical SPECT/CT device for quantitative 99mTc SPECT. We use a commercially available reconstruction package including ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM) with depth-dependent 3-dimensional resolution recovery (OSEM-3D), CT-based attenuation correction, and scatter correction. We validated the method in phantom studies and applied it to images from patients injected with 99mTc-diphosponate. Methods: The following 3 steps were performed to derive absolute quantitative values from SPECT reconstructed images. In step 1, we used simulations to characterize the SPECT/CT system and derive emission recovery values for various imaging parameter settings. We simulated spheres of varying diameters and focused on the dependencies of activity estimation errors on structure size and position, pixel size, count density, and reconstruction parameters. In step 2, we cross-calibrated our clinical SPECT/CT system with the well counter using a large cylinder phantom. This step provided the mapping from image counts to kBq/mL. And in step 3, correction factors from steps 1 and 2 were applied to reconstructed images. We used a cylinder phantom with variable-sized spheres for verification of the method. For in vivo validation, SPECT/CT datasets from 16 patients undergoing 99mTc-diphosponate SPECT/CT examinations of the pelvis including the bladder were acquired. The radioactivity concentration in the patients' urine served as the gold standard. Mean quantitative accuracy and SEs were calculated. Results: In the phantom experiments, the mean accuracy in quantifying radioactivity concentration in absolute terms was within 3.6% (SE, 8.0%), with a 95% confidence interval between −19.4% and +12.2%. In the patient studies, the mean accuracy was within 1.1% (SE, 8.4%), with a 95% confidence interval between −15.4% and +17.5%. Conclusion: Current commercially available SPECT/CT technology using OSEM-3D reconstruction, scatter correction, and CT-based attenuation correction allows quantification of 99mTc radioactivity concentration in absolute terms within 3.6% in phantoms and 1.1% in patients with a focus on the bladder. This opens up the opportunity of SPECT quantitation entering the routine clinical arena. Still, the imprecision caused by unavoidable measurement errors is a dominant factor for absolute quantitation in a clinical setup.

[1]  B H Hasegawa,et al.  Absolute quantification of regional myocardial uptake of 99mTc-sestamibi with SPECT: experimental validation in a porcine model. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  Joachim Hornegger,et al.  Isotropic reconstruction of SPECT data using OSEM3D: correlation with CT. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[3]  Eric C Frey,et al.  Model-based compensation for quantitative 123I brain SPECT imaging , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  A.J. Da Silva,et al.  Absolute quantitation of myocardial activity in phantoms , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[5]  Z. Liang,et al.  Quantitative SPECT brain imaging: effects of attenuation and detector responseat , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[6]  Anna Celler,et al.  Implementation of an iterative scatter correction, the influence of attenuation map quality and their effect on absolute quantitation in SPECT , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  T R Miller,et al.  Clinically important characteristics of maximum-likelihood reconstruction. , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  M. Kaminski,et al.  Use of integrated SPECT/CT imaging for tumor dosimetry in I-131 radioimmunotherapy: a pilot patient study. , 2009, Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals.

[9]  Torsten Kuwert,et al.  Anatomical accuracy of hybrid SPECT/spiral CT in the lower spine , 2006, Nuclear medicine communications.

[10]  An investigation of accuracy of iterative reconstructions in quantitative SPECT , 2008 .

[11]  Shaoying Liu,et al.  Collimator-detector response compensation in quantitative SPECT reconstruction , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[12]  Mountford Pj Foetal risks following antenatal radionuclide administration. , 1989 .

[13]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Compensation for nonuniform resolution using penalized-likelihood reconstruction in space-variant imaging systems , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  J. Knuuti,et al.  EANM/ESC procedural guidelines for myocardial perfusion imaging in nuclear cardiology , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[15]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  J Hornegger,et al.  Effect of CT-based attenuation correction on uptake ratios in skeletal SPECT , 2007, Nuklearmedizin.

[17]  J. Hornegger,et al.  Effekt der CT-basierten Schwächungskorrektur auf den Uptake im Skelett-SPECT , 2007 .

[18]  E Fiedler,et al.  Attenuation correction of SPECT images based on separately performed CT , 2005, Nuklearmedizin.

[19]  Brian F. Hutton,et al.  Efficient scatter modelling for incorporation in maximum likelihood reconstruction , 1998, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  K. Ogawa,et al.  A practical method for position-dependent Compton-scatter correction in single photon emission CT. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[21]  E C Frey,et al.  The importance and implementation of accurate 3D compensation methods for quantitative SPECT. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[23]  Eric C Frey,et al.  Evaluation of quantitative imaging methods for organ activity and residence time estimation using a population of phantoms having realistic variations in anatomy and uptake. , 2009, Medical physics.

[24]  E C Frey,et al.  Quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography: basics and clinical considerations. , 1994, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[25]  S Shcherbinin,et al.  Accuracy of quantitative reconstructions in SPECT/CT imaging , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Clive Baldock,et al.  Quantitative SPECT reconstruction using CT-derived corrections , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  E. G. Hawman,et al.  Analysis of a SPECT OSEM reconstruction method with 3D beam modeling and optional attenuation correction: phantom studies , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[28]  Quantitative accuracy of SPECT reconstructions with a voxelized CT-based partial volume effect correction , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[29]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Scatter modelling and compensation in emission tomography , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[30]  S C Strother,et al.  The convergence of object dependent resolution in maximum likelihood based tomographic image reconstruction. , 1993, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  Bin He,et al.  Comparison of conventional, model-based quantitative planar, and quantitative SPECT image processing methods for organ activity estimation using In-111 agents , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  K. Ogawa,et al.  Compton scatter compensation using the triple-energy window method for single- and dual-isotope SPECT. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[33]  A. Todd-Pokropek,et al.  Society of Nuclear Medicine Procedure Guideline for General Imaging , 2005 .

[34]  Torsten Kuwert,et al.  Hybrid imaging by SPECT/CT and PET/CT: proven outcomes in cancer imaging. , 2009, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[35]  J S Fleming,et al.  A technique for using CT images in attenuation correction and quantification in SPECT. , 1989, Nuclear medicine communications.

[36]  M S Rosenthal,et al.  Quantitative SPECT imaging: a review and recommendations by the Focus Committee of the Society of Nuclear Medicine Computer and Instrumentation Council. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[37]  T D Cradduck,et al.  National electrical manufacturers association , 1983, Journal of the A.I.E.E..

[38]  Rachel Bar-Shalom,et al.  Hybrid imaging (SPECT/CT and PET/CT)--improving the diagnostic accuracy of functional/metabolic and anatomic imaging. , 2009, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[39]  H Iida,et al.  Monte Carlo and experimental evaluation of accuracy and noise properties of two scatter correction methods for SPECT , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[40]  K. Koral,et al.  Recovery of total I-131 activity within focal volumes using SPECT and 3D OSEM , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.