Preparation and properties of rubberised geopolymer concrete: A review

Abstract Interest in geopolymer concrete (GeoPC) and in rubberised concrete (RuC) has grown over the past two decades. The former offers an attractive alternative to ordinary Portland cement (OPC) concrete given its environmental footprint, while the latter provides a sustainable solution to tyre recycling and helps mitigate the depletion of natural aggregates. The benefits of combining the merits of GeoPC and RuC to form rubberised geopolymer concrete (RuG) as a potential sustainable construction material have been recognised in the past few years. As such, this paper presents a detailed review of RuG highlighting its constituent components, preparation and curing aspects, fresh and physical qualities, durability features, and thermal and sound insulation qualities, with a particular focus on mechanical properties. The influence of crumb rubber replacement on key characteristics is critically reviewed, including the effect of binder type, alkaline solution, alkaline solution-to-binder content, and curing conditions. Comparative quantitative assessments and prediction relationships are also presented where relevant. Finally, gaps in the available literature and recommendations for future research are outlined, with a view to supporting further developments in research and future deployment of RuG materials in practice. Whilst previous studies demonstrate the significant potential of RuG and provide essential information on its fundamental properties, this review reveals that much research is still needed in order to optimise the merits of the material and to provide a full characterisation of its behaviour at both the material and structural levels under various loading conditions.

[1]  Areej T. Almalkawi,et al.  Influence of admixtures on rheological properties and heat of hydration of alkali aluminosilicate cement , 2017 .

[2]  Arnaud Castel,et al.  Hybrid life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from cement, concrete and geopolymer concrete in Australia , 2017 .

[3]  H. Yong,et al.  Manufacturing of Fire Resistance Geopolymer: A Review , 2016 .

[4]  A. Elghazouli,et al.  Confinement effects for rubberised concrete in tubular steel cross-sections under combined loading , 2021, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering.

[5]  U. J. Alengaram,et al.  Evaluation of thermal conductivity, mechanical and transport properties of lightweight aggregate foamed geopolymer concrete , 2014 .

[6]  Saloni,et al.  Effect of Pre-treatment Methods of Crumb Rubber on Strength, Permeability and Acid Attack Resistance of Rubberised Geopolymer Concrete , 2021 .

[7]  M. M. Balaha,et al.  Effect of using ground waste tire rubber as fine aggregate on the behaviour of concrete mixes , 2007 .

[8]  S. Hanehara,et al.  Effects of the chemical structure on the properties of polycarboxylate-type superplasticizer , 2000 .

[9]  H. Kamarudin,et al.  Review on fly ash-based geopolymer concrete without portland cement , 2011 .

[10]  Wujian Long,et al.  Sustainable use of recycled crumb rubbers in eco-friendly alkali activated slag mortar: Dynamic mechanical properties , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[11]  Francisca Puertas,et al.  Compatibility between superplasticizer admixtures and cements with mineral additions , 2012 .

[12]  F. Huang,et al.  Further investigation on the dynamic compressive strength enhancement of concrete-like materials based on split Hopkinson pressure bar tests. Part I: Experiments , 2009 .

[13]  M. C. Narasimhan,et al.  Performance of alkali activated slag concrete mixes incorporating copper slag as fine aggregate , 2016 .

[14]  S.C.C. Bate,et al.  Guide for structural lightweight aggregate concrete: report of ACI committee 213 , 1979 .

[15]  Iman M. Nikbin,et al.  Mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete with crumb rubber and steel fiber under ambient and sulfuric acid conditions , 2021 .

[16]  Jing Li,et al.  Properties of concrete incorporating rubber tyre particles , 1998 .

[17]  Faiz Uddin Ahmed Shaikh,et al.  Mechanical and durability properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete containing recycled coarse aggregates , 2016 .

[18]  Bing Chen,et al.  Influence of superplasticizers and retarders on the workability and strength of one-part alkali-activated fly ash/slag binders cured at room temperature , 2019 .

[19]  J. Brito,et al.  RETRACTED: Rubberized alkali-activated slag mortar reinforced with polypropylene fibres for application in lightweight thermal insulating materials , 2020 .

[20]  C. Ghazali,et al.  A Review on Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Rubberized Concrete , 2016 .

[21]  Yeong Huei Lee,et al.  Design innovation, efficiency and applications of structural insulated panels: A review , 2020 .

[22]  Paki Turgut,et al.  Physico-mechanical and thermal performances of newly developed rubber-added bricks , 2008 .

[23]  M. ElGawady,et al.  An experimental investigation of crumb rubber concrete confined by fibre reinforced polymer tubes , 2014 .

[24]  Jueshi Qian,et al.  High performance cementing materials from industrial slags — a review , 2000 .

[25]  J. Carroll,et al.  Fresh and Hardened Properties of Fiber-Reinforced Rubber Concrete , 2016 .

[26]  Erez N. Allouche,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete , 2011 .

[27]  C. Edser Reducing the environmental impact of laundry , 2005 .

[28]  Houssam Toutanji,et al.  The use of rubber tire particles in concrete to replace mineral aggregates , 1996 .

[29]  Z. Man,et al.  Concentration of NaOH and the Effect on the Properties of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer , 2016 .

[30]  Shuaicheng Guo,et al.  Durability performance of rubberized mortar and concrete with NaOH-Solution treated rubber particles , 2017 .

[31]  Levent Bostanci Synergistic effect of a small amount of silica aerogel powder and scrap rubber addition on properties of alkali-activated slag mortars , 2020 .

[32]  Abd Elmoaty M. Abd Elmoaty,et al.  Setting time and 7-day strength of geopolymer mortar with various binders , 2018, Construction and Building Materials.

[33]  C. Atiş,et al.  Optimization of heat cured fly ash/slag blend geopolymer mortars designed by “Combined Design” method: Part 1 , 2018, Construction and Building Materials.

[34]  H. Khabbaz,et al.  In-depth assessment of Crumb Rubber Concrete (CRC) prepared by water-soaking treatment method for rigid pavements , 2014 .

[35]  M. R. Bhutta,et al.  Performance of blended ash geopolymer concrete at elevated temperatures , 2015 .

[36]  Y Zhang,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF SUSTAINABLE CEMENTITIOUS MATERIALS , 2004 .

[37]  Wensu Chen,et al.  Dynamic compressive properties of lightweight rubberized geopolymer concrete , 2020 .

[38]  D. E. Macphee,et al.  Novel cement systems (sustainability). Session 2 of the Fred Glasser Cement Science Symposium , 2010 .

[39]  Feng Liu,et al.  Mechanical characterization of waste-rubber-modified recycled-aggregate concrete , 2016 .

[40]  S. Chaudhary,et al.  Thermal resistance of fly ash based rubberized geopolymer concrete , 2018, Journal of Building Engineering.

[41]  Sandeep Chaudhary,et al.  Development of rubberized geopolymer concrete: Strength and durability studies , 2019, Construction and Building Materials.

[42]  R. Hassanli,et al.  Retrofitting square columns using FRP-confined crumb rubber concrete to improve confinement efficiency , 2017 .

[43]  S. Ruan,et al.  Autogenous healing of fiber-reinforced reactive magnesia-based tensile strain-hardening composites , 2019, Cement and Concrete Research.

[44]  Bo Yang,et al.  Behaviour and design of rubberised concrete filled steel tubes under combined loading conditions , 2019, Thin-Walled Structures.

[45]  Mohd Shahir Liew,et al.  Development of rubberized geopolymer interlocking bricks , 2018, Case Studies in Construction Materials.

[46]  I. Joekes,et al.  Use of tire rubber particles as addition to cement paste , 2000 .

[47]  Fernando Pacheco-Torgal,et al.  Composition, strength and workability of alkali-activated metakaolin based mortars , 2011 .

[48]  Filiz Karaosmanoglu,et al.  Effect of expanded perlite on the mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of lightweight conc , 2011 .

[49]  Mingzhong Zhang,et al.  Workability and mechanical properties of alkali-activated fly ash-slag concrete cured at ambient temperature , 2018 .

[50]  Martin Schneider,et al.  Sustainable cement production—present and future , 2011 .

[51]  Shuaicheng Guo,et al.  Evaluation of properties and performance of rubber-modified concrete for recycling of waste scrap tire , 2017 .

[52]  Kypros Pilakoutas,et al.  Optimisation of rubberised concrete with high rubber content: An experimental investigation , 2016 .

[53]  H. Hadjab,et al.  Effect of elevated temperatures on physical and mechanical properties of recycled rubber mortar , 2016 .

[54]  Francisca Puertas,et al.  Polycarboxylate superplasticiser admixtures: effect on hydration, microstructure and rheological behaviour in cement pastes , 2005 .

[55]  P. Krivenko Why Alkaline Activation – 60 Years of the Theory and Practice of Alkali-Activated Materials , 2017 .

[56]  Jay G. Sanjayan,et al.  Effect of different superplasticizers and activator combinations on workability and strength of fly ash based geopolymer , 2014 .

[57]  Tony Parry Briefing: Development of asphalt and concrete products incorporating alternative aggregates , 2004 .

[58]  P. Sukontasukkul,et al.  Expansion under water and drying shrinkage of rubberized concrete mixed with crumb rubber with different size , 2012 .

[59]  A. Rashad A comprehensive overview about the influence of different admixtures and additives on the properties of alkali-activated fly ash , 2014 .

[60]  J. Sanjayan,et al.  Mechanical and thermal properties of lightweight geopolymer mortar incorporating crumb rubber , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[61]  R. Fediuk,et al.  Structural behavior of out-of-plane loaded precast lightweight EPS-foam concrete C-shaped slabs , 2021 .

[62]  José M. F. Moura,et al.  Distributed state estimation in multi-agent networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[63]  Jikai Zhou,et al.  Experimental and modeling study of dynamic mechanical properties of cement paste, mortar and concrete , 2013 .

[64]  Bhupinder Singh,et al.  Geopolymer concrete: A review of some recent developments , 2015 .

[65]  Aqeel Al-Adili,et al.  Investigation of Incorporation of two Waste Admixtures Effect on Some Properties of Concrete , 2015 .

[66]  Blessen Skariah Thomas,et al.  A comprehensive review on the applications of waste tire rubber in cement concrete , 2016 .

[67]  Chai Jaturapitakkul,et al.  NaOH-activated ground fly ash geopolymer cured at ambient temperature , 2011 .

[68]  D Hardjito,et al.  Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete , 2005 .

[69]  F. Aslani,et al.  Development of Lightweight Rubberized Geopolymer Concrete by Using Polystyrene and Recycled Crumb-Rubber Aggregates , 2020 .

[70]  Maxim Kovtun,et al.  Dry powder alkali-activated slag cements , 2015 .

[71]  J. Dai,et al.  Alternation of traditional cement mortars using fly ash-based geopolymer mortars modified by slag , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[72]  Bo Yang,et al.  Experimental tests and design of rubberised concrete-filled double skin circular tubular short columns , 2018, Structures.

[73]  Camille A. Issa,et al.  Utilization of recycled crumb rubber as fine aggregates in concrete mix design , 2013 .

[74]  João Castro-Gomes,et al.  Strength development of alkali-activated fly ash produced with combined NaOH and Ca(OH)2 activators , 2014 .

[75]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Conduction calorimetric investigation of the effect of retarders on the hydration of Portland cement , 1992 .

[76]  M. Kohail,et al.  Performance of geopolymer concrete containing recycled rubber , 2019, Construction and Building Materials.

[77]  J. Deventer,et al.  The Role of Inorganic Polymer Technology in the Development of ‘Green Concrete’ , 2007 .

[78]  R. Hassanli,et al.  Mechanical performance of FRP-confined and unconfined crumb rubber concrete containing high rubber content , 2017 .

[79]  Ghasan Fahim Huseien,et al.  Evaluation of alkali-activated mortars containing high volume waste ceramic powder and fly ash replacing GBFS , 2019, Construction and Building Materials.

[80]  A.Y. Elghazouli,et al.  Performance of rubberised reinforced concrete members under cyclic loading , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[81]  B. Łaźniewska-Piekarczyk The methodology for assessing the impact of new generation superplasticizers on air content in self-compacting concrete , 2014 .

[82]  Savaş Erdem,et al.  Physico-mechanical, microstructural and dynamic properties of newly developed artificial fly ash based lightweight aggregate – Rubber concrete composite , 2015 .

[83]  Kejin Wang,et al.  Mechanical strength and self-sensing capacity of smart cementitious composite containing conductive rubber crumbs , 2020 .

[84]  Cengiz Duran Atiş,et al.  Influence of admixtures on the properties of alkali-activated slag mortars subjected to different curing conditions , 2013 .

[85]  Ali Hasanbeigi,et al.  Emerging energy-efficiency and CO2 emission-reduction technologies for cement and concrete production: A technical review , 2012 .

[86]  M. Rajendran,et al.  Performance of Crumb Rubber and Nano Fly Ash Based Ferro-Geopolymer Panels under Impact Load , 2020 .

[87]  A. Kashani,et al.  A sustainable application of recycled tyre crumbs as insulator in lightweight cellular concrete , 2017 .

[88]  H. Khabbaz,et al.  Shrinkage performance of Crumb Rubber Concrete (CRC) prepared by water-soaking treatment method for rigid pavements , 2015 .

[89]  M. Palou,et al.  Super High Strength Metabentonite Based Geopolymer , 2016 .

[90]  Mustafa Erdemir,et al.  Utilization and efficiency of ground granulated blast furnace slag on concrete properties – A review , 2016 .

[91]  Mahmoud A. Issa,et al.  Specimen and Aggregate Size Effect on Concrete Compressive Strength , 2000 .

[92]  V. Sirivivatnanon,et al.  Workability and strength of coarse high calcium fly ash geopolymer , 2007 .

[93]  Jay G. Sanjayan,et al.  Effect of admixtures on properties of alkali-activated slag concrete , 2000 .

[94]  Min Zhou,et al.  Dynamic behavior of concrete at high strain rates and pressures: II. numerical simulation , 2001 .

[95]  H. Lee,et al.  Fresh and hardened properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag pastes with superplasticizers , 2014 .

[96]  M. ElGawady,et al.  Mechanical properties of high strength concrete with scrap tire rubber , 2015 .

[97]  R. Siddique,et al.  Properties of concrete containing scrap-tire rubber--an overview. , 2004, Waste management.

[98]  Sujeeva Setunge,et al.  Comparison of long term performance between alkali activated slag and fly ash geopolymer concretes , 2017 .

[99]  Melanie L. Sattler,et al.  Physical, chemical, and geotechnical properties of coal fly ash: A global review , 2019 .

[100]  Bing Chen,et al.  Fresh and hardened properties of one-part fly ash-based geopolymer binders cured at room temperature: Effect of slag and alkali activators , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[101]  M. Collepardi Admixtures used to enhance placing characteristics of concrete , 1998 .

[102]  Z. Khatib,et al.  Rubberized Portland Cement Concrete , 1999 .

[103]  G. Mucsi,et al.  Fiber reinforced geopolymer from synergetic utilization of fly ash and waste tire , 2018 .

[104]  P. Chindaprasirt,et al.  Compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, and water permeability of inorganic polymer concrete , 2010 .

[105]  A. Karrech,et al.  Material and glass-fibre-reinforced polymer bond properties of geopolymer concrete , 2020 .

[106]  P. Banfill,et al.  Alkali activated fly ash: effect of admixtures on paste rheology , 2009 .

[107]  M. Illikainen,et al.  One-part alkali-activated materials : a review , 2018 .

[108]  A. Kusbiantoro,et al.  Development of Sucrose and Citric Acid as the Natural based Admixture for Fly Ash based Geopolymer , 2013 .

[109]  B. Muñoz-Sánchez,et al.  Influence of acetic acid and calcium hydroxide treatments of rubber waste on the properties of rubberized mortars , 2017 .

[110]  Wensu Chen,et al.  Dynamic compressive properties of lightweight rubberized concrete , 2020 .

[111]  Y. H. M. Amran,et al.  Clean production and properties of geopolymer concrete; A review , 2020 .

[112]  G. Baykal,et al.  A new method for improving the thermal insulation properties of fly ash , 2011 .

[113]  Trilok Gupta,et al.  Assessment of mechanical and durability properties of concrete containing waste rubber tire as fine aggregate , 2014 .

[114]  M. Nasr,et al.  Eco-friendly chopped tire rubber as reinforcements in fly ash based geopolymer concrete , 2020 .

[115]  J. Sanjayan,et al.  The application of sodium hydroxide and anhydrous borax as composite activator of class F fly ash for extending setting time , 2017 .

[116]  Mariantonieta Gutierrez Soto,et al.  Performance investigation of high-proportion Saudi-fly-ash-based concrete , 2020 .

[117]  H. Lee,et al.  Setting and mechanical properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag concrete manufactured at room temperature , 2013 .

[118]  U. J. Alengaram,et al.  Microstructural investigations of palm oil fuel ash and fly ash based binders in lightweight aggregate foamed geopolymer concrete , 2016 .

[119]  B. V. Rangan,et al.  Engineering properties of geopolymer concrete , 2009 .

[120]  Andrew Dawson,et al.  Microstructure-linked strength properties and impact response of conventional and recycled concrete reinforced with steel and synthetic macro fibres , 2011 .

[121]  Bharath Simha Reddy Yeddula,et al.  Experimental Investigations and Prediction of Thermal Behaviour of Ferrosialate-Based Geopolymer Mortars , 2020 .

[122]  M. Albitar,et al.  Assessing behaviour of fresh and hardened geopolymer concrete mixed with class-F fly ash , 2015 .

[123]  K. Ohenoja,et al.  Suitability of commercial superplasticizers for one-part alkali-activated blast-furnace slag mortar , 2019, Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials.

[124]  Her-Yung Wang,et al.  Properties of the mechanical in controlled low-strength rubber lightweight aggregate concrete (CLSRLC) , 2016 .

[125]  F. Puertas,et al.  Effect of Superplasticizer and Shrinkage-Reducing Admixtures on Alkali-Activated Slag Pastes and Mortars , 2005 .

[126]  Jing Xin,et al.  Fire risk analysis of residential buildings based on scenario clusters and its application in fire risk management , 2013 .

[127]  A. Senouci,et al.  Rubber-Tire Particles as Concrete Aggregate , 1993 .

[128]  Priyan Mendis,et al.  Engineering properties of inorganic polymer concretes (IPCs) , 2007 .

[129]  A. Karrech,et al.  Strength and durability of geopolymer concrete with high volume rubber replacement , 2020 .

[130]  J. Dai,et al.  The effectiveness of different superplasticizers in ambient cured one-part alkali activated pastes , 2019, Cement and Concrete Composites.

[131]  Basem H. AbdelAleem,et al.  The combined effect of crumb rubber and synthetic fibers on impact resistance of self-consolidating concrete , 2018 .

[132]  H. Kamarudin,et al.  Microstructure of different NaOH molarity of fly ash-based green polymeric cement , 2011 .

[133]  A. Rashad,et al.  Behavior of alkali-activated slag pastes blended with waste rubber powder under the effect of freeze/thaw cycles and severe sulfate attack , 2020, Construction and Building Materials.

[134]  Mingzhong Zhang,et al.  Engineering properties of crumb rubber alkali-activated mortar reinforced with recycled steel fibres , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[135]  S. Chandra,et al.  Influence of superplasticizer type and dosage on the slump loss of Portland cement mortars—Part II , 2002 .

[136]  The Fabrication of Geo-polymer Concrete using Rice husk, Crumb Rubber and GGBS , 2020, Journal of Xidian University.

[137]  Tayfun Uygunoğlu,et al.  Investigation of properties of low-strength lightweight concrete for thermal insulation , 2007 .

[138]  M. Saraya Study physico-chemical properties of blended cements containing fixed amount of silica fume, blast furnace slag, basalt and limestone, a comparative study , 2014 .

[139]  E. Ganjian,et al.  Scrap-tyre-rubber replacement for aggregate and filler in concrete , 2009 .

[140]  I. Hajirasouliha,et al.  Composites with recycled rubber aggregates: Properties and opportunities in construction , 2018, Construction and Building Materials.

[141]  B. Rangan,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND PROPERTIES OF LOW-CALCIUM FLY ASH-BASED GEOPOLYMER CONCRETE , 2005 .

[142]  S. Tudjono,et al.  Study the Effect of Adding Nano Fly Ash and Nano Lime to Compressive Strength of Mortar , 2014 .

[143]  Mingzhong Zhang,et al.  Internal curing of alkali-activated fly ash-slag pastes using superabsorbent polymer , 2019, Cement and Concrete Research.

[144]  Gonzalo Barluenga,et al.  Fire performance of recycled rubber-filled high-strength concrete , 2004 .

[145]  Nishant Yadav,et al.  Mechanical properties of rubber aggregates based geopolymer concrete - A review , 2020, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.

[146]  Alaa M. Rashad,et al.  A comprehensive overview about recycling rubber as fine aggregate replacement in traditional cementitious materials , 2016 .

[147]  D. Hardjito Studies of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete , 2005 .

[148]  Fernando Pacheco-Torgal,et al.  Properties and durability of HPC with tyre rubber wastes , 2012 .

[149]  Enrique Sodupe-Ortega,et al.  Evaluation of crumb rubber as aggregate for automated manufacturing of rubberized long hollow blocks and bricks , 2016 .

[150]  A. Karrech,et al.  Development of high strength one-part geopolymer mortar using sodium metasilicate , 2020 .

[151]  S. A. Zareei,et al.  Ambient-cured alkali-activated slag paste incorporating micro-silica as repair material: Effects of alkali activator solution on physical and mechanical properties , 2019 .

[152]  Prabir Sarker,et al.  Flexural strength and elastic modulus of ambient-cured blended low-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete , 2017 .

[153]  N. Banthia,et al.  Use of rubberized concrete as a cushion layer in bulletproof fiber reinforced concrete panels , 2013 .

[154]  F. Aslani Mechanical Properties of Waste Tire Rubber Concrete , 2016 .

[155]  K. Mehta Reducing the Environmental Impact of Concrete , 2001 .

[156]  Hong Hao,et al.  Dynamic compressive behaviour of spiral steel fibre reinforced concrete in split Hopkinson pressure bar tests , 2013 .

[157]  M. Kokabi,et al.  Sound barrier properties of sustainable waste rubber/geopolymer concretes , 2015, Iranian Polymer Journal.

[158]  P. Deb,et al.  Sorptivity and acid resistance of ambient-cured geopolymer mortars containing nano-silica , 2016 .

[159]  F. Ameri,et al.  Partial replacement of copper slag with treated crumb rubber aggregates in alkali-activated slag mortar , 2020 .

[160]  M. Abdullah,et al.  Effect Of Crumb Rubber On Compressive Strength Of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete , 2016 .

[161]  Manicka Dhanasekar,et al.  Numerical simulation of axially loaded concrete columns under transverse impact and vulnerability assessment , 2010 .

[162]  L. Musa,et al.  The Effect of Different Crumb Rubber Loading on the Properties of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete , 2019, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.

[163]  Hussin Kamarudin,et al.  Comparison of Geopolymer Fly Ash and Ordinary Portland Cement to the Strength of Concrete , 2013 .

[164]  Ali Akbarnezhad,et al.  Recycling of geopolymer concrete , 2015 .

[165]  P. Chindaprasirt HIGH CALCIUM FLY ASH GEOPOLYMER CONTAINING NATURAL RUBBER LATEX AS ADDITIVE , 2020 .

[166]  Songhee Lee,et al.  Prediction on Compressive and Split Tensile Strengths of GGBFS/FA Based GPC , 2019, Materials.

[167]  Tohru Tsujikawa,et al.  Slow Traveling Wave Solutions to the Hodgkin-Huxley Equations , 1987 .

[168]  S. A,et al.  Mitigation of waste rubber tire and waste wood ash by the production of rubberized low calcium waste wood ash based geopolymer concrete and Influence of waste rubber fibre in setting properties and mechanical behavior. , 2020, Environmental research.

[169]  M. Abdullah,et al.  Durability of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete Infilled with Rubber Crumb in Seawater Exposure , 2018, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.

[170]  A. Elghazouli,et al.  Stress–strain response and practical design expressions for FRP-confined recycled tyre rubber concrete , 2020 .

[171]  Kejin Wang,et al.  Mechanical and Conductive Properties of Smart Cementitious Composites with Conductive Rubber Crumbs , 2020, ES Materials & Manufacturing.

[172]  I. Topcu The properties of rubberized concretes , 1995 .

[173]  Bo Yang,et al.  Circular steel tubes filled with rubberised concrete under combined loading , 2019, Journal of Constructional Steel Research.

[174]  F. Liu,et al.  Mechanical and fatigue performance of rubber concrete , 2013 .

[175]  Prinya Chindaprasirt,et al.  Workability and strength of lignite bottom ash geopolymer mortar. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[176]  Yeonho Park,et al.  Compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete with crumb rubber partially replacing sand , 2016 .

[177]  Y. F. Houst,et al.  Adsorption of superplasticizer admixtures on alkali-activated slag pastes , 2009 .

[178]  R. Rosenberger Behaviour of Reinforced Crumb Rubber Ordinary Portland Cement and Geopolymer Concrete Beams , 2018 .

[179]  A. Atahan,et al.  Testing and comparison of concrete barriers containing shredded waste tire chips , 2008 .

[180]  Min Zhou,et al.  Dynamic behavior of concrete at high strain rates and pressures: I. experimental characterization , 2001 .

[181]  J. Szwabowski,et al.  Influence of superplasticizers on rheological behaviour of fresh cement mortars , 2004 .

[182]  Tayfun Uygunoğlu,et al.  The role of scrap rubber particles on the drying shrinkage and mechanical properties of self-consolidating mortars , 2010 .

[183]  A. Laskar,et al.  Effect of Plasticizer and Superplasticizer on Rheology of Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete , 2013 .

[184]  Yuwadee Zaetang UTILIZATION OF CRUMB RUBBER AS AGGREGATE IN HIGH CALCIUM FLY ASH GEOPOLYMER MORTARS , 2019 .

[185]  Kyung-Taek Koh,et al.  The mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete with alkaline activators , 2013 .

[186]  A. Nazari,et al.  Efficiency of Different Superplasticizers and Retarders on Properties of ‘One-Part’ Fly Ash-Slag Blended Geopolymers with Different Activators , 2019, Materials.

[187]  Ergin Arioglu,et al.  Evaluation of Ratio Between Splitting Tensile Strength and Compressive Strength for Concretes up to 120 MPa and its Application in Strength Criterion , 2006 .

[188]  Stephan Pirskawetz,et al.  Acoustic emission and microstructural changes in fly ash geopolymer concretes exposed to simulated fire , 2016 .

[189]  D. V. Bompa,et al.  Experimental assessment and constitutive modelling of rubberised concrete materials , 2017 .

[190]  B. Lee,et al.  Effects of crumb rubber particles on mechanical properties and sustainability of ultra-high-ductile slag-based composites , 2021 .

[191]  B. Hanumantha Rao,et al.  A mix design procedure for geopolymer concrete with fly ash , 2016 .