Fondaparinux with UnfracTionated heparin dUring Revascularization in Acute coronary syndromes (FUTURA/OASIS 8): a randomized trial of intravenous unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes initially treated with
暂无分享,去创建一个
Sunil V. Rao | S. Yusuf | D. Xavier | J. Pogue | C. Granger | J. López-Sendón | S. Mehta | P. Steg | S. Jolly | S. Chrolavicius | H. Rupprecht | Shiona M. Laing | S. Rao
[1] G. Montalescot,et al. Catheter-related thrombosis: biological and clinical evidence for risk with currently available anticoagulants. , 2008, Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis.
[2] K. Werdan,et al. In-vitro comparison of fondaparinux, unfractionated heparin, and enoxaparin in preventing cardiac catheter-associated thrombus , 2008, Coronary artery disease.
[3] Jeffrey L. Anderson,et al. 2007 Focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2008, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[4] S. Yusuf,et al. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the OASIS-5 trial. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[5] William Wijns,et al. [Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes]. , 2007, Revista portuguesa de cardiologia : orgao oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia = Portuguese journal of cardiology : an official journal of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology.
[6] Angelo Branzi,et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2007, European heart journal.
[7] P. Serruys,et al. Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials: A Case for Standardized Definitions , 2007, Circulation.
[8] R. Califf,et al. Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the Superior Yield of the New Strategy of Enoxaparin, Revascularization and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibi , 2006, American heart journal.
[9] S. Steinhubl,et al. Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.
[10] Salim Yusuf,et al. Comparison of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.
[11] S. Yusuf,et al. Effects of fondaparinux on mortality and reinfarction in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the OASIS-6 randomized trial. , 2006, JAMA.
[12] Joseph P Ornato,et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[13] Antonio Colombo,et al. Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2005, European heart journal.
[14] E. Ohman,et al. Antithrombotic therapy during percutaneous coronary intervention: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. , 2004, Chest.
[15] S. Steinhubl,et al. Relationship Between Activated Clotting Time and Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Complications: Analysis of 4 Recent Randomized Clinical Trials of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2004, Circulation.
[16] G. Levine,et al. Relationship between heparin anticoagulation and clinical outcomes in coronary stent intervention: observations from the ESPRIT trial. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[17] G. Niccoli,et al. Heparin dose during percutaneous coronary intervention: how low dare we go? , 2002, Heart.
[18] Carl J Pepine,et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[19] H. Benamer,et al. A randomized trial of a fixed high dose vs a weight-adjusted low dose of intravenous heparin during coronary angioplasty. , 1997, European heart journal.
[20] S. Denardo,et al. Efficacy and safety of minimal dose (< or =1,000 units) unfractionated heparin with abciximab in percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.
[21] ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary and recommendations. , 2000, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.