Photobiomodulation: phenomenology and its mechanism

There are two kinds of pathways mediating cellular photobiomodulation, the specific one is mediated by the resonant interaction of light with molecules such as cytochrome nitrosyl complexes of mitochondrial electron transfer chain, singlet oxygen, hemoglobin or photosensentor such as endogenous porphyrines, the non-specific one is mediated by the non-resonant interaction of light with membrane proteins. Some of specific pathways mediating photobiomodulation can damage membrane or cell compartments such as mitochondria, lysosomes, endoplasmic reticulum by photodynamic damage if the light intensity is very high so that photodynamic damage will limit the maximum intensity of the light of photobiomodulation although the non-specific pathways mediating photobiomodulation might not damage cells. As the reciprocity law, the rule of Bunsen and Roscoe, was not obeyed for almost all the studied photobiomodulation, and the light energy reaps the greatest benefit where it is most needed, photobiomodulation was thought to be dominantly mediated by the non-specific pathways although the specific pathways can act as a role, which is supported by the dose relationship research in which the photobiomodulation effects were found to be the SIN function of radiation time in many works on the dose relationship when the intensity is kept constant. The non-specific pathways were mainly mediated by membrane receptors and the ultraweak non-resonant interaction of light with membrane receptors can be physically amplified by the coherent state of membrane receptors and then chemically exemplified by signal transduction according to our biological information model of photobiomodulation supported by its successful cellular, animal and clinic applications.

[1]  Nili Grossman,et al.  LIGHT EFFECT ON FIBROBLAST PROLIFERATON , 1993 .

[2]  A. Elander,et al.  Preservation of rat skeletal muscle energy metabolism by illumination. , 2003, Life sciences.

[3]  T. Karu,et al.  Photobiology of low-power laser effects. , 1989, Health physics.

[4]  T. Karu,et al.  Cell attachment to extracellular matrices is modulated by pulsed radiation at 820 nm and chemicals that modify the activity of enzymes in the plasma membrane , 2001, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[5]  L. I. Solov’eva,et al.  Effect of low-intensity laser radiation on cells , 1999, Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[6]  T. Karu,et al.  Cell attachment modulation by radiation from a pulsed light diode (lambda = 820 nm) and various chemicals. , 2001, Lasers in Surgery and Medicine.

[7]  I. Kola,et al.  Response of a primary human fibroblast cell line to H2O2: senescence-like growth arrest or apoptosis? , 1997, Cell growth & differentiation : the molecular biology journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[8]  T. Karu,et al.  Melatonin modulates the action of near infrared radiation on cell adhesion , 2003, Journal of pineal research.

[9]  A. Osipov,et al.  Photochemical reactions of nitrosyl hemoglobin during exposure to low-power laser irradiation. , 1997, Biochemistry. Biokhimiia.

[10]  P. Agostinis,et al.  Cell death and growth arrest in response to photodynamic therapy with membrane-bound photosensitizers. , 2003, Biochemical pharmacology.

[11]  A. Tedesco,et al.  Evaluation of the use of low level laser and photosensitizer drugs in healing , 2004, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[12]  A. Schindl,et al.  [Reciprocity regulation in photobiology. An overview]. , 2001, Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete.

[13]  Hans H. F. I. van Breugel,et al.  Power density and exposure time of He‐Ne laser irradiation are more important than total energy dose in photo‐biomodulation of human fibroblasts in vitro , 1992, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[14]  T. Karu,et al.  Photobiological modulation of cell attachment via cytochrome c oxidase , 2004, Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology.

[15]  F. Al-Watban,et al.  The Effect of He-Ne Laser (632.8 nm) and Solcoseryl™ In vitro , 2001, Lasers in Medical Science.

[16]  M. Marques,et al.  Effect of low‐power laser irradiation on protein synthesis and ultrastructure of human gingival fibroblasts , 2004, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[17]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[18]  A. Spasov,et al.  Membranotropic effect of low-intensity laser radiation of the blood , 1998, Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[19]  Tiina I. Karu,et al.  The science of low-power laser therapy , 1998 .

[20]  R Duan,et al.  Signal transduction pathways involved in low intensity He–Ne laser‐induced respiratory burst in bovine neutrophils: A potential mechanism of low intensity laser biostimulation , 2001, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[21]  T. Karu,et al.  Donors of NO and pulsed radiation at lambda = 820 nm exert effects on cell attachment to extracellular matrices. , 2001, Toxicology Letters.

[22]  Yan Li,et al.  Membrane mechanism of low-intensity laser biostimulation on a cell , 2000, Optics and Optoelectronic Inspection and Control.

[23]  Harry Friedmann,et al.  Low Energy Visible Light Induces Reactive Oxygen Species Generation and Stimulates an Increase of Intracellular Calcium Concentration in Cardiac Cells* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  R P Franke,et al.  Biostimulatory windows in low-intensity laser activation: lasers, scanners, and NASA's light-emitting diode array system. , 2001, Journal of clinical laser medicine & surgery.

[26]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[27]  Vladimir P. Minkovich,et al.  Changes in transmission spectrum of human venous blood under action of low-intensity He-Ne laser , 2000, European Conference on Biomedical Optics.