New devices versus conventional balloon technology in patients with coronary artery disease.

[1]  D. Faxon,et al.  National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry as a standard for comparison of new devices. When should we use it, and what should we compare? , 1991, Circulation.

[2]  D. Holmes,et al.  Early outcome after placement of a metallic intracoronary stent: initial Mayo Clinic experience. , 1991, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[3]  J. Forrester,et al.  Excimer laser coronary angioplasty of lesions not favorable for balloon angioplasty , 1991 .

[4]  D. Rothbaum,et al.  Excimer laser coronary angioplasty: Angiographic restenosis rate at six month follow-up , 1991 .

[5]  B Meier,et al.  Angiographic follow-up after placement of a self-expanding coronary-artery stent. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Julio C. Palmaz,et al.  Clinical Experience With the Palmaz‐Schatz Coronary Stent: Initial Results of a Multicenter Study , 1991, Circulation.

[7]  R E Vlietstra,et al.  Restenosis after directional coronary atherectomy: differences between primary atheromatous and restenosis lesions and influence of subintimal tissue resection. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Multivessel coronary angioplasty from 1980 to 1989: procedural results and long-term outcome. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  R D Safian,et al.  Coronary atherectomy. Clinical, angiographic, and histological findings and observations regarding potential mechanisms. , 1990, Circulation.

[10]  L Seipel,et al.  Percutaneous coronary excimer laser angioplasty in patients with stable and unstable angina pectoris. Acute results and incidence of restenosis during 6-month follow-up. , 1990, Circulation.

[11]  D. Holmes,et al.  Coronary atherectomy: first 50 patients at the Mayo Clinic. , 1989, Mayo Clinic proceedings.