Morphometric modelling of ageing in the human pubic symphysis: sexual dimorphism in an Australian population.

Despite the prominent use of the pubic symphysis for age estimation in forensic anthropology, little has been documented regarding the quantitative morphological and micro-architectural changes of this surface. Specifically, utilising post-mortem computed tomography data from a large, contemporary Australian adult population, this study aimed to evaluate sexual dimorphism in the morphology and bone composition of the symphyseal surface; and temporal characterisation of the pubic symphysis in individuals of advancing age. The sample consisted of multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) scans of the pubic symphysis (slice thickness: 0.5mm, overlap: 0.1mm) of 200 individuals of Caucasian ancestry aged 15-70 years, obtained in 2011. Surface rendering reconstruction of the symphyseal surface was conducted in OsiriX(®) (v.4.1) and quantitative analyses in Rapidform XOS™ and Osteomeasure™. Morphometric variables including inter-pubic distance, surface area, circumference, maximum height and width of the symphyseal surface and micro-architectural assessment of cortical and trabecular bone compositions were quantified using novel automated engineering software capabilities. The major results of this study are correlated with the macroscopic ossification and degeneration pattern of the symphyseal surface, demonstrating significant age-related changes in the morphometric and bone tissue variables between 15 and 70 years. Regardless of sex, the overall dimensions of the symphyseal surface increased with age, coupled with a decrease in bone mass in the trabecular and cortical bone compartments. Significant differences between the ventral, dorsal and medial cortical surfaces were observed, which may be correlated to bone formation activity dependent on muscle activity and ligamentous attachments. Our study demonstrates significant sexual dimorphism at this site, with males exhibiting greater surface dimensions than females. These baseline results provide a detailed insight into the changes in the structure of the pubic symphysis with ageing and sexually dimorphic features associated with the cortical and trabecular bone profiles.

[1]  Peter Dangerfield,et al.  Developmental Juvenile Osteology. By LOUISE SCHEUER and SUE BLACK. (Pp. x+587; fully illustrated; $159 hardback; ISBN 0 12 624000 0.) San Diego: Academic Press. 2000 , 2001 .

[2]  James S. Davidson,et al.  Three-Dimensional Finite Element Models of the Human Pubic Symphysis with Viscohyperelastic Soft Tissues , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  K A Mann,et al.  Elastic and viscoelastic properties of the human pubic symphysis joint: effects of lateral impact joint loading. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  Yuan Luo,et al.  Sex determination from the pubis by discriminant function analysis. , 1995, Forensic science international.

[5]  Jennifer M Vollner,et al.  A revised method of sexing the human innominate using Phenice's nonmetric traits and statistical methods. , 2012, American journal of physical anthropology.

[6]  Ambika Flavel,et al.  Age assessment of child skeletal remains in forensic contexts , 2006 .

[7]  Daniel Franklin,et al.  Concordance of traditional osteometric and volume-rendered MSCT interlandmark cranial measurements , 2013, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[8]  Gregory E. Berg,et al.  Pubic Bone Age Estimation in Adult Women * , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[9]  Summer J Decker,et al.  Virtual Determination of Sex: Metric and Nonmetric Traits of the Adult Pelvis from 3D Computed Tomography Models *,† , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[10]  M Y Işcan,et al.  Metric sex determination from the pelvis in modern Greeks. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[11]  P. Mukhopadhyay.  Determination of Sex from Fragment of Hip Bone In Indian Bengali , 2012 .

[12]  Andrew Wade,et al.  Preliminary Radiological Assessment of Age‐related Change in the Trabecular Structure of the Human Os Pubis * , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[13]  Michael J Thali,et al.  Digital forensic osteology--possibilities in cooperation with the Virtopsy project. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[14]  A. Malgosa,et al.  Ilium growth study: applicability in sex and age diagnosis. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[15]  V Burdin,et al.  Determination of age at death: assessment of an algorithm of age prediction using numerical three-dimensional CT data from pubic bones. , 1999, American journal of physical anthropology.

[16]  B. Epker,et al.  Magnitude and Location of Cortical Bone Loss in Human Rib With Aging , 1965, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  S. Brooks,et al.  Skeletal age determination based on the os pubis: A comparison of the Acsádi-Nemeskéri and Suchey-Brooks methods , 1990 .

[18]  C. Hall,et al.  Developmental juvenile osteology.: By L. Scheuer and S. Black. Pp 587. San Diego: Academic Press, 2000. ISBN: 0-12-624000-0. £159.95. , 2001 .

[19]  D. Styne,et al.  Effect of puberty on body composition , 2009, Current opinion in endocrinology, diabetes, and obesity.

[20]  S. Aharinejad,et al.  Morphometric analysis of vertebrae and intervertebral discs as a basis of disc replacement. , 1990, The American journal of anatomy.

[21]  M. Stringer,et al.  The adult human pubic symphysis: a systematic review , 2010, Journal of anatomy.

[22]  V. Vix,et al.  The adult symphysis pubis: normal and abnormal. , 1971, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[23]  D. Kerr,et al.  Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status , 1999, British Journal of Nutrition.

[24]  A. Malgosa,et al.  Pubis growth study: applicability in sexual and age diagnostic. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[25]  H. Gurbuz,et al.  Symphysis pubis distance in adults: a retrospective computed tomography study , 2008, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[26]  R. M. H. McMinn,et al.  Gray's Anatomy , 1973 .

[27]  A. Malgosa,et al.  Sex and age diagnosis by ischium morphometric analysis. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[28]  C. Davenport.  Height‐weight index of build , 1920 .

[29]  C. Lovejoy,et al.  A revised method of age determination using the os pubis, with a review and tests of accuracy of other current methods of pubic symphyseal aging. , 1985, American journal of physical anthropology.

[30]  W. Kaiser,et al.  MRI of the pelvic ring joints postpartum: Normal and pathological findings , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[31]  R. Rizzoli,et al.  Peak bone mass , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[32]  L. Peltier.  Diagnosis of Bone and Joint Disorders , 1988 .

[33]  A. M. Pollard,et al.  Nasty, Brutish, but Not Necessarily Short: A Reconsideration of the Statistical Methods Used to Calculate Age at Death from Adult Human Skeletal and Dental Age Indicators , 1999, American Antiquity.

[34]  Nicole M. Scott,et al.  Intraobserver error associated with measurements of the hand , 2005, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[35]  S. Garn,et al.  Continuing bone growth throughout life: a general phenomenon. , 1967, American journal of physical anthropology.

[36]  E. Caldini,et al.  Histochemical and ultrastructural study of collagen fibers in mouse pubic symphysis during late pregnancy. , 2004, Micron.

[37]  Hervé Rousseau,et al.  Age at Death Estimation Using Multislice Computed Tomography Reconstructions of the Posterior Pelvis * , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[38]  S. Olson,et al.  Single-leg-stance (flamingo) radiographs to assess pelvic instability: how much motion is normal? , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[39]  Ego Seeman,et al.  Intracortical remodelling and porosity in the distal radius and post-mortem femurs of women: a cross-sectional study , 2010, The Lancet.

[40]  Cristina Cattaneo,et al.  Forensic age estimation based on the trabecular bone changes of the pelvic bone using post-mortem CT. , 2013, Forensic science international.

[41]  Margareta Nordin,et al.  Basic Biomechanics of the Musculoskeletal Systm , 1989 .

[42]  Jaroslav Bruzek,et al.  A method for visual determination of sex, using the human hip bone. , 2002, American journal of physical anthropology.

[43]  T. Todd,et al.  Age changes in the pubic bone. I. The male white pubis , 1920 .

[44]  Ann H Ross,et al.  A Geometric Morphometric Approach to Sex Determination of the Human Adult Os Coxa , 2010, Journal of forensic sciences.

[45]  Thomas J Beck,et al.  Sexual dimorphism of the femoral neck during the adolescent growth spurt: a structural analysis. , 2004, Bone.

[46]  Matthew Meredith,et al.  Evaluation of the Suchey-Brooks method of age estimation in an Australian subpopulation using computed tomography of the pubic symphyseal surface. , 2013, American journal of physical anthropology.

[47]  Richmond W. Smith,et al.  Femoral Expansion in Aging Women: Implications for Osteoporosis and Fractures , 1964, Science.

[48]  H. Ranu,et al.  Therapeutic Exercise: Foundations and Techniques. 2nd Edn , 1992 .

[49]  J. Ralphs,et al.  Where tendons and ligaments meet bone: attachment sites (‘entheses’) in relation to exercise and/or mechanical load , 2006, Journal of anatomy.

[50]  Ward Re,et al.  Measurement precision and reliability in craniofacial anthropometry: implications and suggestions for clinical applications. , 1991 .